Not exact matches
And it is singularly unattractive to argue that confidentiality should be recognised by the law in order to protect the
interests of a
solicitor against whom an adverse finding has been made.
The company sets the standards for qualifying and practising as a
solicitor, and regulates
against these standards to protect the
interests of the public using legal services.
Practitioners may therefore be
interested to know about the experience of those of us who defend
solicitors against claims, which naturally range from the nonsensical or outrageous to those where we are hard pushed to say anything in reply except maybe a challenge to the quantum of
interest.
Both Cumbria and Lakeland had instructed
solicitors Baines Wilson (BW) to advise and negotiate on the service agreements between DEFRA and themselves, and they now brought proceedings
against BW alleging professional negligence which had caused them to lose the difference between their invoiced claims (plus presumably
interest) and the settlements which emerged from the mediation, asserting that they had been reasonable to settle, but that the discounts they had been forced to concede were as a result of BW's negligent advice.
Highlights included acting for Omega Atlantic Limited in its professional negligence claim
against GVA Grimley related to funding advice, and are representing Univer Manufacturing in a claim
against its former
solicitors alleging that the firm's drafting of an exclusive distribution agreement and indefinite IP licence failed to protect the client's
interest causing substantial loss.
Where there is a joint retainer, or where the same
solicitors act for two clients in related matters in which they have a common
interest, neither client can claim legal professional privilege
against the other in relation to documents which come into existence, or communications which pass between them and the
solicitors, within the scope of the joint retainer or matter of common
interest concerned.
However, the claimant did have an arguable case to be tried and recourse
against his
solicitors would not provide a sufficient remedy because the claimant sought an
interest in the matrimonial property rather than a financial award.
Wallace v. Canadian Pacific Railway et al. 2013 SCC 39 Barristers and
Solicitors — Relationship with client — Conflict of
interest or duties — Conduct of action
against client McKercher LLP (McKercher) had been representing CN for 10 years.
However, a simplification of the regulatory obligations would now be directly
against the commercial
interests of Riliance and the Law Society, a body which is supposed to represent the
interests of its
solicitor members.
A group of people consisting of a chairman (normally
solicitor / barrister) and others who exercise a judicial function to determine matters related to specific
interests, e.g. VAT Tribunal - appeals
against the amount of duty levied by Customs and Excise Lands Tribunal - appeals
against the valuation of land