The bill also seeks to prevent abortion providers who, it is argued, have a vested financial
interest in the abortion proceeding, from being the source of that information and advice.
Not exact matches
It's
interesting, then, that Boston - based executive John Flynn's anti-
abortion advertising campaign is able to send ads to women
in abortion clinics, using geo - tags furnished by smartphones.
Asked if she felt
abortion defenders championed her rights and best
interests in Roe v. Wade, she responded, «I firmly believe that the only «champions» of this whole situation are the women who have been lucky enough to not be aborted since Roe v. Wade was handed down.
But if we put that matter aside, and if our main
interest lies
in protecting the lives of our people, why do the mavens on national security show no concern for the 1.2 million innocent human lives taken each year
in abortion?
«The «right to
abortion,» with its theme of sexual liberation,» as Hadley Arkes puts it, «has become the central peg on which the
interests of the Democratic party have been arranged,» just as, «since the days of Ronald Reagan, the Republican party has become... the pro-life party
in our politics.»
Most people
in both of these camps — particularly those of faith — are
interested in eliminating
abortions, as well as the reasons a woman may feel compelled to have one.
Suffice it to say that I believe the morality of a given
abortion decision is subject to the competing
interests present
in that particular situation (e.g. life of the mother, incest, ra - pe, severe defects, severe economic hardship to already existing siblings, etc, v.
abortion as birth control, pure personal convenience, etc).
Santorum, et al., may be
interested in other issues besides
abortion and marriage equality, but for progressive, pro-equality Americans, he's just another evil anti-gay jihadist from the Religions «Right.»
Responding to my assertion that twenty - something evangelicals are more
interested in championing adoption and taking
in single moms than protesting at
abortion clinics, pastor and blogger Daniel Darlingwrote:
The great issues of our time are moral: the uses of power; wealth and poverty; human rights; the moral quality and character of society; loss of the sense of the common good
in tandem with the pampering of private
interests; domestic violence; outrageous legal and medical costs
in a system of maldistributed services; unprecedented developments
in biotechnologies which portend good but risk evil; the violation of public trust by high elected officials and their appointees; the growing militarization of many societies; continued racism; the persistence of hunger and malnutrition; a still exploding population
in societies hard put to increase jobs and resources;
abortion; euthanasia; care for the environment; the claims of future generations.
My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique of the book, but rather to comment on two of its more
interesting aspects, namely: (1) its argument that the Federalists,
in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the principle of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state» principles to the issues of
abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.
Cloning, anti-aging technology, human / mechanical intertwining, basic discoveries of science pushing god further into a gap, resource scarcity, will all make for some very
interesting conversations about population control, pregnancy and
abortion in the coming centuries.
Some physicians, however, refuse to perform
abortions and / or provide contraceptives precisely because
in their view, having examined the empirical evidence, such as the recent Royal College of Psychiatrists statement on women's mental health and
abortion, these practices contradict the best
interests of their patients.
Interesting numbers coming out of a CNN poll, saying thirty - eight percent of Americans believe
abortion should be illegal
in most circumstances, but legal
in a few.
If an individual doctor believes it is
in the best
interest of the patient's health to perform a particular method of
abortion, then this judgment must be defended.
There were hardly any questions about issues that most Christians would consider to have a peculiarly moral character, such as
abortion, but intense
interest in topics such as the expansion of NATO.
When she began studying the differences between pro-choice and pro-life advocates
in the
abortion dispute, Kristin Luker noticed something
interesting.
Those who are involved
in small groups often claim that these groups have influenced how they think on political and economic issues — for example, raising their
interest in questions of peace and social justice or,
in the case of conservative religious groups, generating ire about
abortion and gay rights.
It's
interesting PJ because
in some countries where
abortions are allowed — women are aborting girl babies because they have a preference for boys.
In her Yahoo! Parenting article «I Terminated My Baby with Down Syndrome,» Sophie Horan is not shy about painting her abortion as choice made with her baby's interests in min
In her Yahoo! Parenting article «I Terminated My Baby with Down Syndrome,» Sophie Horan is not shy about painting her
abortion as choice made with her baby's
interests in min
in mind.
One of the
interesting aspects which seems to me especially important
in the debate about
abortion is the pre-natal learning of the child
in the womb as a subject of ongoing research.
It is destructive of the
interests of women who are so very often, and
in so many respects, truly
abortion's «secondary victims.»
Doctors are of one mind
in their recommendations if the woman feels wonderful, experiences sexual
interest to her partner, she does not have any contraindications (threat of spontaneous
abortion, multiple pregnancy), she can surely have sex during all the pregnancy.
Suppose the robber said «I convinced them it would be
in their best
interest to «give» me their money, but I didn't pressure them to get an
abortion».
MSI has developed this new online resource for anyone
interested in, or working towards, legal or practical reforms to ensure every woman's right to access safe
abortion services wherever she lives
in the world.»
The group, along with CitizenLink and its coalition of state - based family policy councils, questioned Trump's stances on issues such as
abortion and same - sex marriage (which tended
in the past to be liberal) as well his gambling and casino
interests.
According to Diaz Sr., a Bronx Democrat who is staunchly opposed to
abortion rights, Schneiderman's entire office is «suspect of gross conflict - of -
interest» due to the deep involvement of NARAL
in the AG's 2010 campaign and the long - standing connection to the organization both of the AG himself and his father, Irwin.
The amendment's aim is to break the stranglehold on
abortion counselling of certain groups which Dorries and Field say have a financial conflict of
interest in advising women seeking terminations, and open up counselling to independent counsellers.
Nonetheless the principle of the amendment - «that women considering an
abortion should have access to advice from someone who had no financial
interest in the outcome of her decision» - appears to be supported by 92 % of all MPs.
The court also will be asked to decide whether the Fifth Circuit erred
in concluding that this standard permits Texas to enforce,
in nearly all circumstances, laws that would cause a significant reduction
in the availability of
abortion services while failing to advance the state's
interest in promoting health — or other valid
interest.
At issue is whether a court errs by refusing to consider whether and to what extent laws that restrict
abortion for the stated purpose of promoting health actually serve the government's
interest in promoting health.
I also thought that jknapp brought up an
interesting point that the political thinking
in the book somewhat mirrors the current elections and the brouhahas caused by thoughts on
abortion.
You just have to choose the one that you find the most
interesting to disclose
in your persuasive essay on
abortion.
For breeders, this dog could be the one who is not very
interested in breeding or has a hard time going to term
in her pregnancy, either due to
abortion or delivering prematurely.
In this
interesting exchange he also says climate change is like «
abortion politics.»
the censervtives wake up, McCain is for global warming and only God knows what will his position about
abortion in future for the sake of his own
interest in the election.
«As first noted here late last night,
in today's edition of The Recorder of San Francisco, attorney Cyrus Sanai has an
interesting essay entitled «Taking the Kozinski Challenge» that begins, «The fiercest battle within the federal appellate courts these days is not over
abortion or gay marriage, but the arcane question of whether an attorney may cite the unpublished case law of an appellate court as the binding law of the circuit.»»
Specifically, any advertiser
interested in posting an ad on a heated topic like gun control or
abortion will need to be verified.
The Forum is intended for physicians, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, certified nurse midwives, social scientists, researchers, and other health professionals
interested in advancing evidence - based practices
in family planning,
abortion, and preventive reproductive health services.
«The state of Texas is not
interested in proliferating the
abortion business.
The court can only grant the minor's petition if the judge determines that, by clear and convincing evidence, the minor is sufficiently mature to decide whether to have an
abortion, or that, by a preponderance of the evidence, giving parental notice would not be
in the minor's best
interest.
Under the federal constitution, a minor has the right to a two - tiered hearing
in which they are entitled to show that they are mature enough to give informed consent to the
abortion, and if they are not sufficiently mature, that waiver is
in their best
interest.
If the judge does not find that the minor is sufficiently mature to make the decision to have an
abortion, the judge must then determine whether the parental notification requirement is or is not
in the minor's best
interest.
The Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates is the advocacy and political arm of Planned Parenthood health centers
in Florida and represents the
interests of 22 health centers statewide, 15 of which provide
abortion care.
Moreover, some states have built on the federal guarantee by taking steps such as ensuring that patients can receive insurance coverage for a full year's supply of contraceptives at one time (rather than for either one or three months at a time, as is typical).10 This development is especially important for
abortion patients who are not
interested in LARCs but may need time to find another type of provider for ongoing contraceptive care — if, for example, they do not live near the
abortion clinic.
While not all patients are
interested in receiving contraceptives at the time of an abortion, many are: In a 2010 Guttmacher Institute survey of abortion clinic patients, two - thirds expressed a desire to leave their appointment with a contraceptive method and slightly more than half indicated a preference for receiving contraceptive information and services during their abortion care rather than in other health care settings
in receiving contraceptives at the time of an
abortion, many are:
In a 2010 Guttmacher Institute survey of abortion clinic patients, two - thirds expressed a desire to leave their appointment with a contraceptive method and slightly more than half indicated a preference for receiving contraceptive information and services during their abortion care rather than in other health care settings
In a 2010 Guttmacher Institute survey of
abortion clinic patients, two - thirds expressed a desire to leave their appointment with a contraceptive method and slightly more than half indicated a preference for receiving contraceptive information and services during their
abortion care rather than
in other health care settings
in other health care settings.1
The proportion of U.S. contraceptive users relying on LARCs jumped from 2.4 %
in 2002 to 14.3 % in 2014, the highest level ever recorded in the United States.9 There is also some evidence that LARCs are highly desired by many abortion patients and that patient interest increases when LARCs are available for immediate postabortion initiation.1, 11,12 Notably, all contraceptive methods, including LARCs, are appropriate for immediate uptake following a surgical abortion.13 In addition, recently updated medical guidelines support providing implants and injectable contraception at the time of a medication abortion, along with previously available methods like the pill, patch and ring; the IUD is now the only method that providers can not offer on the day medication abortion is started.14 This broader array of options is particularly significant given that medication abortion represents an increasing proportion of all abortions nationall
in 2002 to 14.3 %
in 2014, the highest level ever recorded in the United States.9 There is also some evidence that LARCs are highly desired by many abortion patients and that patient interest increases when LARCs are available for immediate postabortion initiation.1, 11,12 Notably, all contraceptive methods, including LARCs, are appropriate for immediate uptake following a surgical abortion.13 In addition, recently updated medical guidelines support providing implants and injectable contraception at the time of a medication abortion, along with previously available methods like the pill, patch and ring; the IUD is now the only method that providers can not offer on the day medication abortion is started.14 This broader array of options is particularly significant given that medication abortion represents an increasing proportion of all abortions nationall
in 2014, the highest level ever recorded
in the United States.9 There is also some evidence that LARCs are highly desired by many abortion patients and that patient interest increases when LARCs are available for immediate postabortion initiation.1, 11,12 Notably, all contraceptive methods, including LARCs, are appropriate for immediate uptake following a surgical abortion.13 In addition, recently updated medical guidelines support providing implants and injectable contraception at the time of a medication abortion, along with previously available methods like the pill, patch and ring; the IUD is now the only method that providers can not offer on the day medication abortion is started.14 This broader array of options is particularly significant given that medication abortion represents an increasing proportion of all abortions nationall
in the United States.9 There is also some evidence that LARCs are highly desired by many
abortion patients and that patient
interest increases when LARCs are available for immediate postabortion initiation.1, 11,12 Notably, all contraceptive methods, including LARCs, are appropriate for immediate uptake following a surgical
abortion.13
In addition, recently updated medical guidelines support providing implants and injectable contraception at the time of a medication abortion, along with previously available methods like the pill, patch and ring; the IUD is now the only method that providers can not offer on the day medication abortion is started.14 This broader array of options is particularly significant given that medication abortion represents an increasing proportion of all abortions nationall
In addition, recently updated medical guidelines support providing implants and injectable contraception at the time of a medication
abortion, along with previously available methods like the pill, patch and ring; the IUD is now the only method that providers can not offer on the day medication
abortion is started.14 This broader array of options is particularly significant given that medication
abortion represents an increasing proportion of all
abortions nationally.
Among the most commonly heard are that even though public funds may not directly be used to perform
abortions, they nonetheless «free up» private funds that may then be used; that family planning agencies that also provide
abortions must have a vested
interest in «funneling» women to their
abortion service; and that taxpayers should not be required to pay for things they consider to be immoral.