Sentences with phrase «interested in doing right»

This book is a resource for any company owner, large or small, interested in doing right by their employees and customers, but unsure where to start or what «corporate social responsibility» even means.

In my current job specifically, I come across a lot of people who are interested in doing the right thing (with recycling for example), but either don't know what that is, or maybe have been doing the wrong thing thinking it's right.

Building that type of knowledge is not easy, but most manufacturers offer a wealth of educational materials and options to help ensure that retailers who are interested in doing it right have everything they need.

Such results might influence the thinking of an objective observer primarily interested in doing right by the nation's poor children.

You'd thing the Catholic Church would put all considerations of lawsuits aside if it was truly interested in doing the right thing.

Not exact matches

(Indeed, ESPNW is doing some of the most interesting and important work in sports journalism right now: look no further than its recent profile of Christy Mack, an adult film star who was brutally assaulted by her boyfriend, a mixed martial arts fighter.)

This is something that I believe makes all the difference of whether you can stick to a daily routine or not... Finding others who also have an interest in a great and productive routine really is probably 80 - 90 percent of what you can do to set yourself on the right track.»

«They have a vested interest in making sure that it's done right, that it's good, that there are no mistakes made and pointing out any problems.»

(Yes, there are some questions about fake likes, but since I'm interested in comparative data, we don't have to worry about those right now.)

Companies that do this wind up becoming a revolving door, whether it's because prospective employees see the role as a temporary landing pad and are less interested in learning, or because you decide later on that they aren't the right fit.

That doesn't always mean writing a large check, but it does require thinking through what the ideal outcome should be, the type of work involved and identifying the right audience for the artists who have a vested interest in making the project happen.

There is a core misunderstanding about how that system works, which is that — let's say if you are a shop and you are selling muffins, right, you might want to target people in a specific town who might be interested in baking or some demographic, but we don't send that information to you, we just show the message to the right people and that's a really important, I think, common misunderstanding of how the system works.

«I do not believe that public opinion in the Philippines or the national interest of the Philippines would support the relinquishing of Philippine rights, territory or sovereignty, and I can't imagine that is President Duterte's intention,» Daniel Russel, the US's chief diplomat for East Asia, said.

The problem here is not the opportunity for enrichment; the problem is that the responsibility to put someone else's interests first, to do what's right for them is in jeopardy.

The Court of Appeal rejected the arguments, saying Mars Canada had an obvious interest in defending its trademark rights, and it did sustain actual damages given that its sales were cannibalized by the grey market products.

Is there a place for people who are interested in entrepreneurship but don't have the right personality?

Whether you're interested in building homes or prefer contracting the services needed to get the job done, this guide will help you determine what type of construction or contracting business is right for you.

If you are interested in beating the market — but understand that doing so will always be very difficult — then you have come to the right place.

I don't have time to do a whole Defending Cramer piece right now and I'm not interested in having this post turned into a warzone for...

To the contrary, the annals of corporate law are replete with instances in which managers faced with a conflict of interest did the right thing.

One of the governance principles is that «Shareholders should be entitled to voting rights in proportion to their economic interest...» In other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO herein proportion to their economic interest...» In other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO hereIn other words, the Group does not favour multi-voting share structures that characterize over 80 companies on the TSX and that have been popular in Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO herein Canadian IPOs over the last few years (see comments on Aritzia's IPO here).

«Right out of the gate there's a lot of people that are interested in doing it.

Note that this guide doesn't tell you exactly how to find the right publishers or make the request to feature your content; if you're interested in more information, be sure to check out our comprehensive guide to link building.

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

It does not seem that the corporation / union should have the right to lobby, speak for, etc. for / against candidates or issues that I do not think are in my best interest.

Scott Stoltzman Data Scientist • Stoltzman Consulting Founder • Flannelytics Since I began working in a coworking space, I often encounter people who do high - level, interesting stuff that doesn't make sense to my feeble, right - side...

In his opening remarks (4:50), Sen. Bill Nelson, D - Florida, tells Wilbur Ross, «It tells me you are committed to doing the job the right way, by placing the public's interest ahead of your own.»

12) To better secure each News Company's rights under this guarantee and Indemnity, each guarantor agrees to charge the interest they have either solely or jointly or as tenants in common in any real estate and personal assets, and each guarantor acknowledges a News Company's right pursuant to the security hereby given lodge a caveat on any real estate in which they have such as interest and each guarantor agrees to execute a mortgage in favour of any News Company upon request by a News Company and do or cause to be done all such things as are necessary to give effect to the security hereby given.

These are helpful.You are right that market failures have hit elder popluation in heavy way in past decade or so, and on top of that the fed locks interest at artificial rate low, so if we did save like our wise elder and financial advisors told us to do, we now get about nothing at all in interest return on those life savings.

If done right, refinancing can potentially save you thousands in interest payments.

If a Series B investor wants to invest in the company 2 million for a 20 % interest, then, the Series A investor, if he wants to maintain a 20 % interest in the company, has to use the right of first offer to invest an additional 400k (if he doesn't invest, it would be diluted to 16 %, so he has to pay for the 4 %, which is 400k in our case) to maintain the 20 % interest.

With this much apparent interest in the sector, I'd be hard - pressed to believe that he wouldn't want to have the flexibility to do a deal if the right one came along; Wendy's new cash hoard puts him in exactly that position, albeit indirectly.

Human rights does not lend itself to treatment within a trade agreement, however, and the Chinese have made it abundantly clear that they are not interested in putting their human rights record under scrutiny in a trade context.

however it wasn; t perfect, there was quite a lot of filler in this 12 episode season which I could have done without, characters which were really interesting and important in the last seasons are just not as much right now and can be quite annoying, breaking the flow of the emotionally heavy scenes in that very episode.

I'm more interested in asking «did we even get the message right?»

What's interesting about the people who use God to pretend it's not them fixing themselves is that they do not see that it would be Jesus who took them right up to the brink in the first place.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

It is in the best interest of this country to do so, the Government realizes that, and since they can make laws to make it easier for people to do so, without infringing on your right to live your life the way you want, it makes sense for them to make that law.

I don't think the catholic bishops (or christian conservatives) have any interest in violating anyone's right to healthcare options that are legally allowed by the government.

If you want to think about God, you'll have to get an interest in theology... and what you're doing right here is the level zero of theology.

And if things don't move in that direction - well, you might find he has nice friends, or he might turn out to be right for one of your friends, or you might just have a pleasant evening, or he might introduce you to some new ideas, books, music or interests.

Second, just as Maher maybe doesn't have the right to be heard or isn't really interested in engaging with us, so also, we Christians who criticize atheists often don't have the right to be heard either or are only interested in judging and condemning.

You defenders of religion keep some interesting company: Osama Bin LLaden, Iraninan Mullahs, Saudi Wahabists (who will cut your head off in public if you preach anything but Islam), Joe Smith who preached that black people did not have souls (the church changed it mind after the civil rights act and are now bigotted against gay people), the Taliban, the pope and his child rapists, ignorant & stupid evangelicals who think that revelations is a roadmap to the future.

We have to find ways to do the right things, because it is in our long term interest to do so.

Or again, note that God is normally pictured as the supreme practitioner of the morality which humans must follow — but that, in an interesting twist, Abraham (in Gen. 18:25), Job and others can step forward and remind God to do what is right.

These two books are not comparable in age, sophistication, focus, or intention, but they do share that «standard brand» environmentalism I alluded to above, that human interests must be restrained before nature's rights.

The message of this book is that democratic life should be conceived not as an enterprise of autonomous men, no matter how clever they may be in organizing to pursue their interests, but as a way of realizing the Will of Heaven — that is, of doing the truth and serving the right in which man's proper being and destiny consist, This is another manner of signifying the «public philosophy» earlier mentioned.

The other interesting facts in this article were the Unitarian sound of his upbringing, a religion in its own right that is not compatible with Christianity and Obama's statements about the Bible that reveal he really does not know much about Christianity.

We could have an interesting conversation about race, memory, and HONOR in America (as opposed to mere or simple dignity), roping ole Tocqueville back into it, or not; either way, it does seem right to conclude that the racial valences to this news item might actually yield in important ways to the manifold pressures of MANLINESS, especially Manliness Today — local cop vs. jetsetting prof, and all that...

Readers interested in a theoretical critique of animal rights as antiliberal would do well to consult Luc Ferry's 1992 work Le nouvel ordre ecologique (The New Ecological Order, scheduled to be published in translation by the University of Chicago Press in 1995).