That is if you're more
interested in political debate than a bun fight, of course.
Not exact matches
Their
interest in local and national politics is intense: They picket regularly for pro-life causes, enroll their children
in debate clubs that argue for conservative
political ideas, and rally for Bush
in the 2000 election.
2 There is an ancient
debate regarding whether all human action (and, therefore, all
political action) is solely
in pursuit of self -
interest.
Childless and independent, with far more
interest in the latest
political and theological
debates than trends
in cloth diapering, I, like so many others, dismissed «mommy blogging» as trivial, jejune.
Paladino also praised a man he just recently was quoted as calling a «degenerate idiot» — former Gov. George Pataki — saying his fellow Republican «put his own
political best
interests aside for the public good» by insisting
in 2002 that the minor party gubernatorial candidates be included
in debates along with his Democratic opponent, then - state Comptroller H. Carl McCall.
The raging public
debate, largely ill - informed, is not premised on what is
in Ghana's national
interest, but what will give the largest boost to the
political fortunes of the NDC & NPP
in the run up to November's Presidential and Parliamentary elections.
Turning next to UKIP, there are clearly still
interesting debates to be played out
in a party that is only just reaching
political maturity.
In short, the continued possibility of independence may frame political debate within in the UK in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
In short, the continued possibility of independence may frame
political debate within
in the UK in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in the UK
in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's interests understood as distinct from, and potentially in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in negative and corrosive terms, with Scotland's
interests understood as distinct from, and potentially
in tension with, those of the rest of the U
in tension with, those of the rest of the UK.
It is a disease spread apparently upon contact with British
political debate: the sense that the BBC is engaged
in a conspiracy against their
interests.
Interest in this year's European Parliamentary elections has been growing steadily: citizens» groups and
political organisations started organising election panels and public
debates by January — several...
Interpretations of the National
Interest have been at the forefront of the
debate in an entirely new way for the British, pitching referendum against parliamentary voting, domestic and against foreign policy issues, numerical majorities against
political and economic arguments, elites against elites.
The referendum has produced the greatest
political storm
in British politics for many decades, and the notion of the National
Interest lies at the heart of the
debate.
The kerfuffle caused by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs» acknowledgment that there are enough seats
in play to flip control of the House this fall has eclipsed another
interesting political debate: Could Republicans win the Senate majority too?
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) says the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) can not boycott this year's
debate slated for September, saying the
debate is for the good of the
political parties and so it will not be
in their best
interest to boycott it.
«There aren't any of the
political heavy weights that you find
in this battle on the pro side, at least that I know of so far,» said Blair Horner of the New York Public
Interest Research Group, which is remaining neutral
in the con - con
debate
Numerous articles weigh
in on the
political and academic
debates about funding universal pre-K, but the more
interesting and basic question at hand is what we're asking of pre-K.
Certainly, other parties at
interest have pursued the protected calm and rational patois provided by the judicial process
in place of subjecting themselves to the bare - knuckle pummeling of
political debate.
Another northern Louisiana representative captured the
political situation during
debate in the House Education Committee, «We have a governor who is very
interested....
Political expediency and self -
interest are well to the fore as parliament starts to
debate the plan, which is closer to the original Gonski model than present arrangements and would inject an extra A$ 18.6 billion
in federal funding across the government, Catholic and independent school sectors over a decade.
During the
debate in the U.S. Senate over the confirmation of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, much of the focus centered on partisan
political differences and intense opposition from special
interest groups.
In 2013, keeping
interest rates low was a hot
political debate.
It happens
in political debates over conflicting
interests.
«This is not a technical book on climate change, as others have said, however if you want your opinion on the AGW
debate to be an informed one or are
interested in the
political forces even now shaping the future global climate, this is essential reading.»
A must - read for anyone
interested in the
political as well as scientific
debate.
Doing too little may expose Australia to ongoing changes elsewhere, yet this strategic repositioning to the rest of the world gains only marginal
interest in the public and
political debate.
A few points that have caught my
interest so far: • dealing with complex problems using complex tools, ideas • the idea of reconciliation
in scientific
debates is to try different approaches
in an experimental meeting for attempting nonviolent communication
in impassioned
debates where there is disagreement • reconciliation is not about consensus, but rather creating an arena where we can have honest disagreement • violence
in this
debate derives from the potential impacts of climate change and the policy options, and differing
political and cultural notions of risk and responsibility.
Doing this is a
political action, not a scientific one, and shows that the writer is
interested in scoring
debating points, not examining the science.
My
interest is
in debates about the environment, and the
political ideas which underpin those
debates.
What is at issue is not an
interest in the public's understanding of the science, but their attachment to sides
in the
political «
debate».
Issuing statements of «consensus» or «authority» is antithetical to good science, and especially so
in circumstances where the originating organizations have been established with
political intent, have acted to restrict public
debate or have a financial conflict of
interest.
He said that while evangelical churches typically don't have endowments, he has been watching the divestment campaign with
interest and expects church leaders across the country to grow more vocal as global warming resurfaces
in political debate.
There is some real
interest in this approach, mainly from academics, and there is also what I would characterize as «strategic
interest,» principally from those who recognize that once the focus is on carbon taxes rather than other instruments,
political debates will inevitably result
in less ambitious targets or,
in fact, no policy at all.
A three - year preparatory process culminates
in one week of sessions,
debates and cultural activities, where all stakeholders with an
interest in water issues come together to push for strong
political commitment for a greater priority to be given to appropriate water management strategies.
For instance, if the the US not only has economic
interests in the climate change policies
in political debate but also obligations and duties to poor vulnerable nations to not cause them great harm from US ghg emissions, the United States may not justify failure to act to reduce its ghg emissions on the basis of economic cost to the US.
Like the tobacco lobbyists who spent years denying the links between smoking and cancer, global warming denialists don't have to win the
debate — they simply have to confuse the public indefinitely to successfully undermine any
political action which might hit the
interests of their backers
in the fossil fuel industries
Climate sensitivity is an
interesting discussion, but completely irrelevant
in terms of the current
political debate, because even the lowest remotely plausible climate sensitivity would fully justify the most aggressive mitigation now under discussion.
However, it seems to me that the public
interest aspect of John Quiggin's article
in the public press (AFR) is that he disentangles the
political debate from the scientific basis for a practical economic policy problem.
The first
debate included representatives from both government and business, and demonstrated a clear
political interest in investment protection treaties and its design.
[73] This is all the more true
in an age when the public is exposed to an astounding quantity and variety of commentaries on issues of public
interest, ranging from
political debate in the House of Commons, to newspaper editorials, to comedians» satire, to a high school student's blog.
The context is a libel case where the judge talks about the «astounding quantity and variety of commentaries on issues of public
interest, ranging from
political debate in the House of Commons,... Continue reading SCC comments on blogging
My main
interest in this venture, as I explained early on, was to guage every - day Realtor
interest in their own communal politics /
political structures; the vote result was entirely incidental (I figured on a 50/50 split, no matter the raw voter numbers), but it did give rise to some very spirited
debate, which I heartily enjoyed, as did others, you included, I must assume.