Sentences with phrase «interesting about atheists»
What I find interesting about atheists is that their belef in God is probably greater than anyone else's.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
The thing I find interesting about Atheists is that they seem to be obsessed with people of faith.
Not exact matches
I find it interesting that the apparent atheists who feel the need to make themselves feel better by criticizing the bible and Christianity with snide little comments would even waste their time reading a blog — about belief.
It's interesting how atheists are always crying about having religion shoved in their faces.
What I find interesting about debates like the one this article engendered is that so many atheists will argue «science,» yet they do not look to actual scientist / believers who made significant contributions to science, yet saw no conflict in doing so while also believing in a «Creator.»
Isn't it interesting that both atheists and fundamentalist Christians have a similar view about the God of the Exodus?
what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.
The really interesting thing about you atheists is that you fail to acknowledge that your absolute «certainty» there is no God, is very much a religion unto itself.
the interesting thing about so many atheists is their forceful description of themselves as «free - thinkers».
This article should be of no interest to you or any other Atheists, yet there are plenty of them making negative comments about the church and people who are religious.
As an atheist, I am not interested in forcing anything on anyone, other than being «fundamentalist» about separation of church and state.
yan — there is this interesting fallacy i see repeated regularly on these comment boards about atheist leaders killing millions of people.
I don't talk about it a lot because rather than exploring belief and how I came to believe it, I generally just get bombarded by both atheists and Christians (primarily, though other theists have bashed me too) for being irrational and stupid and other less interesting insulting things.
Atheists are not interested in learning about or discussing God because they have it all figured out — right?
I also find it interesting that atheist talk as much or more about God than most Christians I know.
It was not about your mother, hindu secular, ignorant self centered, no one is interested to know profession of mother of a hindu atheist, ignorant self centered.
If you are really interested about the murder of innocents consider this... atheists have murdered more innocent people in the last 100 years than were killed in all previous centuries.
Interesting discussion — Totally agree about the «punching above their weight» problem with the current spate of «popular» atheists and junk writers, as well as the «Hollywood» treatment of Pullman, but you don't need to wade through Pullman's trilogy to get a useful insight into institutionalism vs genuine spirituality — just pick up the excellent «The Dragon in the Sea» by Dune author Frank Herbert or «The Moon is a Harsh Mistress» by Robert Heinlien — great works from the Golden Age of Science Fiction literature.
Your philosophical readers may be interested in two bits of anecdotal confirmation of items in the article, one about good atheists and one about bad secondary sources.