Sentences with phrase «interesting argument you presented»

Very interesting argument you presented, and it's got me thinking.

Not exact matches

In a recent interview with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg TV, Cuban presented an interesting argument against people pursuing so - hot - right - now computer science degrees or attending learn - to - code bootcamps.

Unless the argument is that interest rates and inflation are likely to remain low for the indefinite future, it's absurd to argue that present levels of inflation and interest rates are relevant to setting the valuations of stocks.

Still not sure I agree with this totally, but it presents an interesting argument against Calvinistic election.

The aim of Catholic Voices is to assist interested parties in articulating well - founded arguments supporting traditional Catholic teaching and to train participants in presenting the Church's case on contentious issues in the media.

Infidelity — same as above, but a bit more interesting, given the arguments presented.

Fundamental to this task is the search for an objective ground for value claims — a well - reasoned argument for external standards which resists the ever - present tendency to reduce ethics to the subjective whims and passions of personal self - interest.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

According to an argument made by Jacob S Sherkow, published in The CRISPR Journal, he traces some of the key developments in the CRISPR patent estate to the present day but is most interesting for its predictions about how the technology's IP landscape will change in the future.

While I do happen to agree with much of the politics Levinson espouses regarding the current political climate, as well as share in some of his fears regarding technology and corporate interests, I do think that the way Levinson presents his arguments doesn't quite work as an effective film overall.

The links provided do not necessarily reflect my personal opinion and should be seen as general interest: oftentimes I do not agree with arguments presented, but nevertheless think it is worthwhile to read them.

Dear Steve, Your question presents an interesting argument.

The «moral hazard» argument against CDR goes something like this: CDR could be a «Trojan horse» that fossil fuel interests will use to delay rapid decarbonization of the economy, as these fossil interests could use the prospect of cost - effective, proven, scaleable CDR technologies as an excuse for continuing to burn fossil fuels today (on the grounds that at some point in the future we'll have the CDR techniques to remove these present - day emissions).

It means review by other scientists, whose interest is in truth, facts, and knowledge, and they gain stature in their own reputation by pointing out weaknesses in the arguments and data presented in the original work.

Dear Don, your post was really informative and this is very interesting and most sensitive issue in the present world.climate ethics are most important for everyone.because these are an important role in climate changes.i agree with your argument, i think scientific measures must have been taken by the government in order to successful implementation of the climate ethics.

The wealth of data and provocative arguments presented here make «Smart Solutions to Climate Change» a valuable resource for policy - makers, NGOs, academics, students, and everybody who is interested in learning more about the economic realities that face us as we confront this challenge.»

For reasonable, rational people with minimal vested interests in the topic - presenting the arguments and the facts as you do on this site is a good strategy.

The second problem with their argument is that while carbon tax revenues could, in theory, be used to pay for present and future adaptation costs, few on the right are at all interested in so using that revenue, including Neeley and Murray.

I would be interested in reading the detail of the arguments presented but I don't have access to E&E.

Judith — I am interested in your statement in favour of «a more traditional review that presents arguments for and against, discusses the uncertainties, and speculates on the known and unknown unknowns».

129 In the third place, as regards the argument that the disclosure of documents relating to the ACTA could only have reinforced the public interest with regard to international relations and avoid controversy arising from the leaked publication of certain proposals, it should be noted that, while it is true that the purpose of Regulation No 1049/2001 is to ensure maximum transparency by giving the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents of the European Union (recital 4 of the regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions to the right of access to protect certain public or private interests, and in the present case, the public interest as regards international relations.

Going further in the analysis, the Court validates the argument of perceived conflicts of interests in each of the present cases precisely because both times, the data subjects concerned are decision makers who hold two positions or two interests that can be perceived as conflicting.

[In] so far as the applicant's argument seeks, in essence, to invoke, in the present case, an overriding public interest in disclosure, it should be noted that the exceptions to the right to access under Article 4 (1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 are mandatory exceptions, unlike other exceptions to the right to access, and do not make any reference to the consideration of such an interest.

Mr. Butler then presented a very interesting and well - thought out legally framed argument which cited case law and relevant legislation.

The discretion of the court will be exercised with a view to the best interests of the children, as presented and contorted by counsels» able argument.

Both sides present compelling arguments, which in any event, are far more interesting in the long run than the way I learned torts back in law school.

In his opinion presented last Thursday, Advocate General Cruz Villalon suggests the Court should say no — based on somewhat conventional, yet interesting arguments which use the rules of interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in a very selective way.

For present purposes, the point of interest is that the judge took the opportunity to confirm (in the face of contrary argument from Richmond) that where a respondent is ordered to disclose assets, it must disclose details of bank accounts.

But whenever it seems likely that the child's views and interests may not be properly presented to the court, and in particular where there are legal arguments which the adult parties are not putting forward, then the child should be separately represented.»

The court is going to be focused on the best interests of the children, so whatever argument is presented to the judge must be made in that light.

On the one hand, a permissive stance toward new arguments by tribunals on appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is presented with the strongest arguments in favour of both sides... This remains true even if those arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasons.

About Blog LAPG will present well taken objections to the reform package, based on the impact of the reforms on the interests of clients, sound economic argument and the public interest.

Although there were some interesting legal arguments presented that I've omitted for the sake of brevity, the decision should be an interesting one, especially if they expound or decide on any of the positions taken by the parties.

The fact that Zuckerburg is presenting his argument as «well we are giving it away for free» is insulting in its own right, but to blame Apple for doing what is in corporate interest is downright absurd.

About Blog LAPG will present well taken objections to the reform package, based on the impact of the reforms on the interests of clients, sound economic argument and the public interest.