Not exact matches
And, while
interested observers may be equally as divided in their
opinion of the settlement, most should
concur that it amounts to a step (or nudge) in the right direction.
And even more
interesting, Steph Tai at
Concurring Opinions ponders how the Carhart Court's willingness to defer to Congressional findings to resolve scientific uncertainty might apply in other cases such as those involving global warming, where scientific and legal findings are intermingled.
Although the majority based their conclusion on his right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, the partially
concurring and dissenting
opinions and the judgment as a whole provide an
interesting insight into the way freedom of conscience challenges are to be approached in a secular society where religion holds less sway than individual ethical positions on certain issues.
Legal Issues Related to the Elections If you're more
interested in election law than how the candidates would apply the law, check out these two posts: Discussion of how the outcome of voter registration lawsuits, now ongoing, may change the outcome of the election, from The Indiana Law Blog, and an analysis of laws addressing campaign activity within the vicinity of voting booths, from Timothy Zwick at
Concurring Opinions.
Some
interesting responses from Daniel Solove at
Concurring Opinions, Scott Greenfield at Simple Justice, David Giacalone at f / k / a, Carolyn Elefant at My Shingle.
As Justice Stevens stated in his
concurring opinion in Glucksberg, «[t] he State has an
interest in preserving and fostering the benefits that every human being may provide to the community — a community that thrives on the exchange of ideas, expressions of affection, shared memories, and humorous incidents, as well as on the material contributions that its members create and support.
The
Concurring Opinions intern will help us on projects ranging from law school rankings, to the next edition of the law professor blogger census, to upgrading the technical aspects of the site, to collecting legal stories of
interest to our readers in an informative and
interesting way.
Presumably coincidentally, here in the U.S., Solangel Maldonado at
Concurring Opinions considers whether current divorce laws unduly steer couples toward ending marriages rather than working through difficulties: «Given society's
interest in marriage and all of the negative consequences of divorce, should law incentivize couples to repair the marriage after infidelity?
While countless others have already made many
interesting points about this attorney misconduct (see, e.g.,
Concurring Opinions here and here, OrinKerr.com, and Scoplaw), I want to raise it now in connection with the fact that the faculty at GW law are convinced their students are completely untrustworthy cheaters.
In a post on
Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca asks an
interesting question about what importance, if any, should attach to the fact that a constitutional provision invoked in a case has never been applied by the courts, or has not been applied in a very long time.
Capias Capias Mittimus CAPTA (Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act) Caption Case Management Cause of Action CEJ (Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction) Central Authority Certification Certified Divorce Financial Analyst Cestui Que Trust Charge to Jury Child Abduction Child Abuse and Neglect Child Representative Child Support Enforcement Child Support Guidelines Child Support Payment Children's Rights Circuit Court Citation Civil Code Civil Contempt Civil Law Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Union Clear and Convincing Evidence Classifications of Law Clerk of the Court COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Codicil Cohabitation COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) Collaborative Divorce Collaborative Law Commencement of Action Common Law Common Law Marriage Community Property Competency Complainant Complaint for Divorce
Concurring Opinion Condonation Confidential Privilege Conflict of
Interest Conjugal Rights Consanguinity Consent Order Conservator Consolidation Constitution Contemnor Contempt of Court Contested Divorce Contingency Fee Continuance Contract Co-Respondent Corroborative Witness Cost Analysis Counsel Counseling Count Counterclaim Court Court Costs Court of Equity Court Order Court Reporter Court Services Officer Covenant Marriage Coverture CRC (Children's Rights Council) Criminal Contempt Cross-Examination Cruel and Abusive Treatment CSRA (Child Support Recovery Act) Custodial Parent Custody Custody Affidavit Custody Evaluation Custody Preference
Two judges entered a
concurring opinion, stating that they believed a broker could plausibly claim a protectible
interest in its renters list and so those allegations should proceed to trial.