Erik's position is extreme, but his point of view provides
an interesting point of tension for viewers.
Not exact matches
Those who approach matters from a dualistic
point of view often miss this commonality
of long - term
interest, seeing primarily the
tensions.
90 %
of these are brought about through a binary choice presented on screen, and with Book
of Shadows allowing you to save at any
point by simply hitting the triangle button to bring up the menu screen, the choices themselves serve only as a stop gap, an
interesting «what happens if I choose this» scenario that builds no
tension and has no real consequence because it is so easily reversible.
The
tension in the choice
of words in the dialog on this topic, No Dogmatism, clearly shows that many
of the writers are more
interested in communicating their
point of view and not friendly to contrary ideas or are seeking a real dialog with you.
Re your post # 157, maybe you have something to say about «tipping
points», being that cloud droplet nucleation, growth, and evaporation are nice manifestations
of behavior around a «tipping
point», or struggle
of competing «
interests» (surface
tension, vapor pressure, e.g.) tipping towards a particular outcome (growth, evaporation, or niiice and steady now)...
A broader thought: There is a
tension between the public
interest and the
interests of electricity companies (at all
points along the chain
of supply).
Tension There will always be some points of tension where states may seek to ignore or manipulate PIL to pursue perceived strategic / political int
Tension There will always be some
points of tension where states may seek to ignore or manipulate PIL to pursue perceived strategic / political int
tension where states may seek to ignore or manipulate PIL to pursue perceived strategic / political
interests.