Sentences with phrase «interests against insurance companies»

Our firm is prepared to advocate for your interests against insurance companies that may attempt to deny liability or place an unrealistic monetary value on your injury.

Not exact matches

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

The portfolio includes bonds and uses bank and insurance company contracts (wraps) to protect against interest rate volatility.

It's in the insurance company's best interest, your best interest, and the best interest of all policyholders to make sure that any liability claim against a policy is properly defended.

The presence of an MVA helps protect the insurance company against early withdrawals from the annuity, and in turn, the MVA allows the insurance company to generally credit a higher interest rate to the annuity contract.

However, in practice, insurance companies do require that beneficiaries have reasonable insurable interest at the start of the policy as a precaution against wagering, homicide, or other mortal peril.

There is also specific investor interest in long - dated assets that match liabilities for pension funds and insurance companies, and hedge against future inflation risk.

We are dedicated to representing victims against insurance companies that do not have their best interest at heart.

Ian is proud of his «uniquely well - resourced team» leading legal challenges against the vested interests of insurance companies and employers.

When an insurance company fails to protect the interests of its insured, tort victims making a claim against the insured may have the opportunity to recover in excess of the insurer's policy limits.

If your insurance company does take action against you (which again, they are not legally allowed to do), we will quickly act in your best interests to advise you of your rights and actions to take next.

You need solid representation, especially when going up against insurance companies that do not have your interests in mind.

It is very important that you have a legal professional protecting your best interests and rights against insurance companies.

Attorney Jedediah «Jed» A. Main, Esq., is a Former State Prosecutor and a Former Insurance Company Defense Attorney who understands what it takes to be successful against the deep - pocketed insurance companies whose top priority is to protect their own financial iInsurance Company Defense Attorney who understands what it takes to be successful against the deep - pocketed insurance companies whose top priority is to protect their own financial iinsurance companies whose top priority is to protect their own financial interests.

While there is no bar to an injured party proceeding directly against the defendant regardless of insurance coverage, it is usually in the best interest of the injured person for the insurance company to be involved because of the additional financial resources available.

Mrs. Gilliland has an interest in insurance law litigation and has previously handled both ERISA and non-ERISA claims, including bad faith litigation against insurance companies.

On October 28, 2010, First American Title Insurance Company («First American») earned a judgment and damages award in its favor in the amount of $ 434,913.39, plus interest, in Colorado state court against Jeffrey Lavenhar.

Assuming you can prove continued insurability, pay off the overdue premiums plus interest, and cover any outstanding loans against the cash value, some life insurance companies will let you reinstate a policy within a certain time period.

However, in practice, insurance companies do require that beneficiaries have reasonable insurable interest at the start of the policy as a precaution against wagering, homicide, or other mortal peril.

When you do so, the money you borrow is considered a loan against the policy, and the insurance company will charge interest on the loan.

It's in the insurance company's best interest, your best interest, and the best interest of all policyholders to make sure that any liability claim against a policy is properly defended.

Continuing the prior example, assume that Sheila had accumulated a whopping $ 100,000 policy loan against her $ 105,000 cash value, and consequently just received a notification from the life insurance company that her policy is about to lapse due to the size of the loan (unless she makes not only the ongoing premium payments but also 6 % / year loan interest payments, which she is not interested in doing).

One of the virtues of cash value life insurance is that insurance companies are willing to make loans against the policy at relatively favorable interest rates, because the insurance company knows that it can always foreclose on the policy (i.e., force its surrender) as collateral to repay the loan.

The argument against it is that the money returned to you at the end earned no interest and the insurance company held onto your money the whole time and made the spread.

Some insurance companies will even permit you to take out low - interest loans against your policy's cash value.

I know insurance companies would argue against this, but if you've had a policy in place for several years and it lapses because you miss a payment, do you think they have a strong interest in reinstating it, or possibly just calling all of the payments made as profit with no further need to worry about paying a death benefit?

Private life insurance companies also know that if the case goes against them they will have to pay not just the claim amount but a hefty penalty amount and interest.

Rather than having the company pay the dividends in cash to the policyowner and then have the policyowner turn around and write a check to the insurance company to pay policy loans or interest on loans, the policyowner may have the dividends applied directly against the policy loans and / or interest on loans.