Sentences with phrase «interests child custody determination»

In the state of Nevada, the following factors (in no particular order) are evaluated as part of a best - interests child custody determination:

Not exact matches

In Massachusetts, child custody determinations are based on the best interests of the child.

To make this determination, the Court exercises certain deliberations to award custody, generally based upon those factors considered to be in the best interest and welfare of the child (ren).

Legal precedent and conflicting philosophies regarding joint custody notwithstanding, the ultimate determination still rests upon the best interests of the child.

Answers to frequently asked questions about how child custody determinations are made, such as the importance of the child's best interests; the meaning of «primary caretaker;» and more.

Basics of what a court considers when grandparents seek visitation or custody of a child, a determination that is primarily based on the child's needs and best interests.

Nebraska: The court makes a custody determination based on the best interests of the child, which include the relationship of the child to each parent; (b) the desires and wishes of the child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the child; credible evidence of any abuse in the household.

Virginia courts, first and foremost, consider the best interest of the child in making a child custody determination.

Both pieces of legislation dictate that the determination of custody and access of the children following a separation or divorce will be based upon the best interests of the child in the circumstances.

In such circumstances comity is violated because the issuing state might still believe its courts have an interest in protecting its residents in such child custody determinations.

Therefore, in any judicial determination regarding the custody of children, including where they reside, the best interests of the child should be the standard and primary consideration.

If the court finds it is not in the best interests of the child to relocate as defined herein, but the parent with whom the child resides the majority of the time elects to relocate, the court shall make a custody determination and shall consider all relevant factors including the following where applicable:

Child custody can be determined by stipulation of the parties, which is preferable, or by a court determination using the best interest of the child stanChild custody can be determined by stipulation of the parties, which is preferable, or by a court determination using the best interest of the child stanchild standard.

There isn't really a significant difference in the determination of custody and parenting time between California and Nevada in that both states focus on a standard of what's in the best interest of minor children.

Section 24 of the Children's Law Reform Act states that any determination with regards to custody and access will be based on the best interests of the child.

In making a custody determination, Illinois courts look at evidence that shows what is in the best interest of the child.

Almost all family law courts base custody determinations on the best interests of the children.

Therefore, when making a custody determination for your children, it is important to take their age, interests (extracurricular activities), education, religion and current lifestyle into consideration.

Like all states, Alabama courts make custody and visitation determinations based on the best interests of the child.

However, if the determination is that the interests of the child would be better served by placing all legal authority with one parent, the condition is known as full custody.

In Idaho, «the court may award either joint physical custody or joint legal custody or shared custody based on the court's determination of the best interests of the child or children.»

Even in states without breastfeeding laws, a judge can consider breastfeeding when making a custody determination since custody is to be awarded according to the best interests of the child.

If mediation is not successful, the court may then appoint a custody evaluator as well as an individual to represent the child's interests - a guardian ad litem, child representative or attorney - in order to assist the court in making a custody determination.

Virginia custody determinations are based on what the court determines is in the child's best interest.

In making such determinations, the family courts of Hawaii do not award custody based on the parent's gender or wealth but on the best interests of the child.

Like all states, an Arizona court bases child custody determinations on what is in the best interests of the child, but a judge will consider certain factors in making a determination.

Like most states, the standard for child custody determination in California is the overall best interest of the child such that it assures the «health, safety, and welfare» of the child and «frequent and continuing contact» with both parents.

All states use a «best interests of the child» standard when making custody determinations.

Like most states, the standard for child custody determinations in California is the overall best interest of the child with an emphasis on ensuring the health, safety, and welfare of the child and frequent and continuing contact with both parents absent child abuse, domestic violence, or where the contact would not be in the best interest of the child.

In an initial custody determination, the trial court has «the widest discretion to choose a parenting plan that is in the best interest of the child.»

adoption service (s)(in intercountry adoption) The six major services provided by adoption service providers: (1) Identifying a child for adoption and arranging an adoption; (2) Securing the necessary consent to termination of parental rights and to adoption; (3) Performing a background study on a child or a home study on a prospective adoptive parent (s), and reporting on such a study; (4) Making nonjudicial determinations of the best interests of a child and the appropriateness of an adoptive placement for the child; (5) Monitoring a case after a child has been placed with prospective adoptive parent (s) until final adoption; or (6) When necessary because of a disruption before final adoption, assuming custody and providing (including facilitating the provision of) child care or any other social service pending an alternative placement.

Even if the custodial parent is otherwise «fit,» such bad faith conduct may be relevant to a determination of what permanent custody arrangement is in the minor children's best interest.

In making both temporary and permanent custody determinations, Nevada courts are primarily concerned with what is in the best interest of the child.

Custody disagreements are settled by a judge's determination of what is in «the best interests of the child.»

Judges must promote the best interests of the child in making all custody determinations.

All states use the «best interests of the child» standard in making custody and visitation determinations.

The court always considers the child's best interests when making child custody determinations.

Again, the court will make a custody determination based on the «best interest of the child» standard, giving consideration to the factors listed in the above section (O.R.C. 3109 (F)-RRB-.

According to the California Family Code, the standard for child custody determinations in California is the overall best interest of the child with an emphasis on assuring the «health, safety, and welfare» of the child and «frequent and continuing contact» with both parents.

While most states use the «best interests of the child» standard in making custody determinations, Wisconsin...

Ohio uses the best interests of the child standard to make custody determinations and one of the factors examined within this standard is the continuity and stability of the child's home life.

Oklahoma, like all states, uses the «best interests of the child» standard in making custody and visitation determinations.

When courts make a determination regarding child custody and parenting time, the court must take into consideration the best interests the child.

Once the initial custody determination has been made if either parent wants to change the custody arrangement they have to show the court, first and foremost, that there has been a substantial change in circumstances which effect the best interests of the child.

The best interest of the child is the major focus in determination of child custody.

The purpose of these interviews is to help the psychologist make an analysis and issue a report that is meant to help the judge decide what custody determination would be in the best interests of a child.

When a Florida family law judge makes a custody determination, the judge's main concern is establishing a parenting plan that is in the best interests of a child.

In Massachusetts, child custody determinations are based on the best interests of the child.

«[The court's] findings concerning parental competition and alienation, Verda's willingness to make needed changes, her ability to make difficult decisions for the children's long - term welfare, her capacity to model behavior needed for the children to become healthy adults, and her availability to provide weekday stability all support the court's determination that awarding primary physical custody to Verda was in the children's best interests.»

California, like other states, considers the best interests of the child when making custody determinations.