However, it tends to blur the relationship between property and republican freedom, and between property and democracy, focusing instead on absence of domination and arbitrary
interference by other individuals and groups, including the State.
Not exact matches
This is characterized
by competition for the marketplace which is open to anyone who can produce the goods and services, unhindered
by government subsidy, monopoly, or
other interference with competition.1 For a system actually to function as free enterprise capitalism there must be opportunity for
individuals in the general populace to obtain education and also to obtain access to capital and resources for new ventures.
While I agree, I'm not sure that explains why they side with one party and not the
other (since the GOP seems very much for
interference of the
individual by government, as well seems OK with various corporate - level safety nets)
We therefore have a collective duty to respect these rights of
individuals, especially so, when such
individuals occupy very important or strategic institutions of state which the framers of our constitution in their wisdom, found it prudent to guarantee their independence
by among
others insulating them from the
interference or control of the Executive or any
other body.
In effect, it might be reasonable to state that such roles and responsibilities to protect can not be blocked
by the invocation of sovereignty — as claimed
by Jammeh and many
other dictators in the not - so - distant past — therefore, «sovereignty no longer exclusively protects States [
individuals] from foreign
interference; it is a charge of implicit responsibility for the States to be accountable on behalf of the welfare of their people».
C.A., June 2, 2011)(34413) Mar. 7, 2013 The reasonableness of
interference must be determined
by balancing the competing interests, as in all
other cases of private nuisance, and that balance is appropriately struck
by whether, in all of the circumstances, the
individual claimant shouldered a greater share of the burden of construction than would be reasonable to expect
individuals to bear without compensation.
For the rule of law to exist, citizens (and
others) must have a right of access to an independent lawyer who is able to defend their freedoms without fear or
interference, and to ensure that their
individual rights are protected against abuses and excesses of power
by the state and
by those acting in its name.
For in truth, «No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded,
by the Common Law, than the right of every
individual to the possession and control of his own «person,» free from all restraint or
interference of
others [including government], unless
by clear and unquestionable authority of law.