Not exact matches
Over time, we gathered thousands of pages of
internal Exxon documents that fleshed out the picture hinted at by Henry Shaw's participation in the 1979
climate conference: that Exxon was so interested in
climate science that it had launched its own ambitious
research into the critical global warming questions of the day.
Although statements in this pamphlet are partially true in that Exxon «carefully studied» the
science behind
climate change, it contradicts its own
internal findings with early
climate change
research and emphasizes unknowns in the «honest debate.»
In the course of an
internal review and audit begun in March of 2007, the University determined that some of the
research funds accepted on behalf of the Friends of
Science «had been used to support a partisan viewpoint on
climate change», and unspent grant money was returned on September 10, 2007, according to a Calgary Foundation statement.
In the course of an
internal review and audit begun in March of 2007, the University determined that some of the
research funds accepted on behalf of the Friends of
Science «had been used to support a partisan viewpoint on
climate change» and had returned unspent grant money on September 10, 2007, according to a Calgary Foundation statement.
Yet after a decade of
internal discussions and
research on global warming, Exxon spent more than 20 years discrediting
climate change
science.
As noted in
internal audits, the film was funded through a «
climate change»
research fund controlled by Barry Cooper, a political
science professor at the University of Calgary.
As noted in a University of Calgary
internal audit, this project was funded through a «
climate change»
research fund controlled by political
science professor Barry Cooper and fed by donations from various oil companies and foundations.