There are serious issues with
the internal validity of these studies as well.
The problem here is a lack of control prevents us from being able to test
the internal validity of the study.
No significant interaction of intervention condition (control vs full) with the attrition variable was found for effects on related fifth - grade measures, reinforcing
the internal validity of the study with respect to all comparisons of the full intervention and control groups.
A limitation of this clinical trial was the rate of attrition through 12 months after discharge, which presents a threat to
the internal validity of the study.
The crux of the study ratings is an assessment of
the internal validity of the study, that is, the study's potential for establishing that the observed outcomes were caused by the program, rather than other factors.
Efficacy trials concentrate on maintaining
the internal validity of the study to demonstrate treatment effects and emphasis is often placed on reducing conditions that might prevent treatment effects from emerging by eliminating more complex subjects (e.g., excluding those exhibiting comorbidity), eliminating more complex families that might not be able to complete or carry out treatment, or including children exhibiting high symptom levels but not meeting diagnostic criteria for the disorder under study.
Not exact matches
We matched ResQu items to domains identified by these authors as critical to
study quality,
internal and external
validity, and standard
of reporting.
[17] This is a big problem for
internal validity because we are left with the result that parents who refused participation in the Abecedarian program were less willing or able to commit to a long - term early childhood intervention for their children than the overall population
of families who were recruited into the
study.
A
study of the impact
of a social program that has high
internal validity is designed and analyzed such that there is confidence that the groups being compared differ only in their experience
of the treatment program.
With that background, I'll take you quickly through my ratings
of the
internal and external
validity of the
studies that have been most frequently cited in the debate on the Obama administration's proposal for Preschool for All and related efforts.
Thus, the
studies get a grade
of B for
internal validity.
In contrast, the only two
studies in the list with both high
internal and external
validity (Head Start Impact and Tennessee) find null or negative impacts, and all
of the
studies that point to very small, null, or negative effects have high external
validity.
The two groups are just.not comparable, how any
studies get published on this topic is beyond me, the
internal validity of such an analysis just isn't there.
Investigators have used it as the criterion for diagnosis
of behavior disturbance against which to gauge the
validity of both screening instruments27 and psychological interview measures.28 The published Spanish version
of the CBCL used in this
study has been found to have good
internal consistency and concurrent
validity in Spanish - speaking populations.29 The CBCL was chosen as the standard
of comparison to avoid basing the calculation
of PSC
validity on a small subset
of the data as done in previous
studies using structured interviews as the standard24,30 - 32 and because the CBCL has been widely used as the criterion standard in previous PSC research in both middle - class30, 33 - 35 and low - income minority populations.8
The purpose
of this paper is to review the evidence base for three widely - used home visiting programs that have met the federal criteria for evidence - based to highlight the limits to both the
internal and external
validity of the evidence and to provide a case
study as a point
of comparison using data from a large, statewide implementation effort.
The purpose
of this
study was to evaluate the following: 1) the construct
validity of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (Steger et al., 2006), Greek Version using different explorative and confirmative factorial analysis approaches like Bifactor EFA, ICM - CFA, Bifactor CFA and ESEM; 2) the measurement invariance
of MLQ across gender; 3) the
internal consistency reliability
of the MLQ; and 4) the convergent and discriminant
validity of the MLQ with measures
of well - being and mental distress.
More specifically, the objectives
of this
study are the following: 1) To validate the construct
validity of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (Steger et al., 2006), Greek Version using both exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis techniques like Bifactor EFA, Bifactor CFA and ESEM; 2) to examine measurement invariance
of MLQ across gender; 3) to
study the
internal consistency reliability
of the MLQ; and 4) to evaluate the convergent and discriminant
validity of the MLQ with the constructs
of well - being, hope, anxiety, depression, stress, hope and resilience.
Previous
studies have found TCSQ to have high reliability and
validity as a measure
of coping style in China.49 50 In this
study, Cronbach's α for the total scale was 0.845, and the
internal consistency coefficients
of the subscales were α = 0.823 (positive coping) and α = 0.863 (negative coping).
This article presents three
studies examining the
internal and external
validity of GOALS and the stability
of life goals over a period
of two years.
The results
of the three
studies confirm that the life goal questionnaire GOALS possesses high
internal und external
validity.
Internal validity refers to whether the effects observed in a
study are due to the manipulation
of the independent variable and not some other factor.
Consequently, the aim
of the present
study was to 1) examine the psychometric properties
of the online administered parental rating
of the SDQ in terms
of its
internal consistency, factor structure, and concurrent
validity with another instrument measuring similar constructs, and 2) provide parental norms for the SDQ from a nationwide representative Swedish sample
of 10 — 13 year old children.
Knight et al. [65]
studied internal consistency and cross-cultural
validity of the Child Hostility Scale [66].
Limitations include possible selection bias as no information is provided on the Parents Anonymous ® members who refused to participate in the
study, the lack
of a control group, and threats to
internal validity
to
internal validity and design limitations
of this community
study.
At the same time, there is disagreement in the field about the strength
of the evidence on the effectiveness
of parent support programs for child outcomes, primarily because
of the scarcity
of studies with strong
internal validity, i.e. reduced bias
of different kinds.
An analysis
of the mall
study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations,
internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the
validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall
study within scholarly and legal arenas.
In
study 3, we tested the
internal consistency reliability, split - half reliability and criterion - related
validity of the three subscales.
Apart from generating findings on the
internal consistency
of the scales
of positive youth development, life satisfaction, and problem behaviour, the present
study further demonstrated the
validity of these constructs via confirmatory factor analyses.
Validity studies conducted with independent groups
of adolescents indicated high
internal consistency (αs =.77 and.88) and test - retest reliability over 1 - and 2 - week intervals (r =.82 and.85, respectively)(Blascovich & Tomaka, 1991).
Several
studies have addressed the
validity of the parent - reported SDQ in school - aged samples, predominantly confirming the intended 5 - factor structure.5, 6 A 3 - factor configuration
of externalizing (conduct problems and hyperactivity), internalizing (emotional and peer problems), and prosocial factors has also been proposed and suggested for use in epidemiologic
studies and in low - risk populations.7, 8 The
internal reliability
of SDQ subscales has been predominantly examined by using Cronbach's α, a measure
of the interrelatedness
of items; however, α estimates are a lower bound for reliability and is often underestimated.9 A meta - analytic review reported weighted mean α coefficients extracted from 26
studies that showed generally modest reliabilities for parent reports (0.53 < α < 0.76).10 McDonald's ω, which estimates the proportion
of a scale measuring a construct, typically yields higher reliability estimates but has rarely been used to assess reliability
of the SDQ.
A literature review
of 747
studies concluded that the HADS demonstrated good concurrent
validity,
internal reliability and discriminant
validity (Bjelland et al. 2002).
The CSI has shown satisfactory
internal consistency (alpha =.69 -.94)[44,45] and good test - retest reliability (r =.67 -.83) in young adults [44] and concurrent
validity with other measures
of coping [46](this
study, alphaengagement =.89, alphadisengagement =.86).
Therefore, the current
study aims to test the
internal structure and
validity of the FEEL - KJ in a large sample
of Dutch - speaking Belgian children and adolescents (N = 1102, 8 — 18 years old).
Externalizing and internalizing problems were measured via parent report on the Externalizing and Internalizing subscales
of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition — Parent Rating Scales (BASC - 2; Reynolds and Kamphaus 2004), used previously to
study emotional and behavioral problems in youth with ASD (Volker et al. 2010), and found to have high
internal consistency (α = 0.81 — 0.94), test re-test reliability (r =.88 — .91), and moderate to high concurrent
validity (r =.53 to.83; Reynolds and Kamphaus 2004).
Study 1 provided initial evidence
of reliability and
validity for the QPCCE by exploring factorial structure,
internal consistency and test - retest reliability.