Following clinical evaluation, participants who had no exclusionary medical or psychiatric conditions were diagnosed with CFS if they met criteria of the 1994
international case definition [23] as quantified by the CDC Symptom Inventory and ancillary criteria of the MFI and SF - 36 [26, 31].
For classification as CFS, those with a score ≥ well - population medians on the general fatigue or reduced activity scales of the MFI were considered to meet fatigue criteria of the 1994
international case definition.
Not exact matches
The study, published in Calcified Tissue
International, found that the
International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS)
definition identified the most
cases of the condition (8.3 per cent of the cohort) and was linked with significantly higher numbers of falls in the last year and prevalent fractures.
Our study and the negative reports from the UK and the Netherlands evaluated patients for exclusionary conditions and defined CFS according to criteria of the 1994
International CFS Research
Case Definition [23] or the earlier Oxford case definition [
Case Definition [23] or the earlier Oxford case defini
Definition [23] or the earlier Oxford
case definition [
case definitiondefinition [24].
The 1994
International CFS
case definition and the Canadian Consensus Criteria are different and do not necessarily identify similar groups of ill persons.
Based on the detailed interview, those meeting criteria of the 1994
International CFS Research
Case Definition [23] were classified as CFS - like and other respondents classified as either unwell (not CFS - like) or well.
The Lombardi et al. study specifies that samples were selected from patients fulfilling the 1994
international CFS
case definition [23] and the 2003 Canadian Consensus Criteria for CFS / ME [25].
The physician's evaluation and routine clinical laboratory tests served to identify medical conditions considered exclusionary for CFS, specified in the 1994
case definition [23] as further clarified by the
International CFS Study Group in 2003 [31].
There can hardly be a more poignant example of the need for
international co-operation than the drive against money laundering (which goes hand in hand with that against
international corruption), nor a more clear example that, whether for good or ill, we live in a globalised world, where traditional
definitions of jurisdiction and boundaries may be obstacles to
case prosecution.
After failing in the first instance, he appealed to the Conseil d'État, arguing that the decision of the authorities erroneously relied on the
definition of «armed conflict» as defined in IHL and as construed by, for example, the
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the Tadić
case.
In the former
case, it would be incumbent on courts to identify any germane
international human rights documents, apply that meaning to the relevant Charter provision, and then either accept that
definition or seek to rebut it by meeting an unknown standard.
Arbitration, Article 35, ASML, Brexit, Brussel I Verordening, Brussels I Regulation, C - 283 / 05,
Case 125/79,
Case C - 559 / 14,
Case C - 619 / 10, CJEU, Conflict of laws, Court of Justice,
definition, Denilauler, ECJ, EEX Verordening, Enforcement, exclusion, Exequatur, Freezing injunction, freezing order, Judgment, Jurisdiction Regulation, Mareva injunction, Mareva order, Meroni, ordre public, Ordre Public
International, Private international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verord
International, Private
international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verord
international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verordening 44/2001
Arbitration, Article 35, ASML, Brussel I Verordening, Brussels I Regulation, C - 283 / 05,
Case 125/79,
Case C - 559 / 14,
Case C - 619 / 10, CJEU, Conflict of laws, Court of Justice,
definition, Denilauler, ECJ, EEX Verordening, Enforcement, exclusion, Exequatur, Freezing injunction, freezing order, http://www.uniset.ca/other/cs4/19801AER213.html, https://milieudefensie.nl/publicaties/bezwaren-uitspraken/shell-rechtszaak-memorie-van-grieven-van-shell-in-hoger-beroep, Judgment, Jurisdiction Regulation, Mareva Compania Naviera SA v
International Bulkcarriers SA, Mareva injunction, Mareva order, Meroni, ordre public, Ordre Public International, Private international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verord
International Bulkcarriers SA, Mareva injunction, Mareva order, Meroni, ordre public, Ordre Public
International, Private international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verord
International, Private
international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verord
international law, Public policy, Regulation 1215/2012, Regulation 44/2001, Rights of the defence, Trade Agency, Verordening 44/2001