LONDON, 30 May, 2017 — In forthright language seldom heard in
international climate policy negotiations, a renowned German economist says it is time for the world to accept the truth about the real cost of fossil fuel, and to reject the lie that coal, oil and gas cost society nothing.
Not exact matches
When Boston - based Oxfam America began addressing
climate issues, «they had no one with
climate change or
policy experience, and found me,» recalls Coleman, who was eager to move into
international negotiations.
By implementing the quartet of
policies by 2015, nations could buy «precious time while
international climate negotiations continue,» says economist Fatih Birol, the lead author of a report released here yesterday by the International Energy
international climate negotiations continue,» says economist Fatih Birol, the lead author of a report released here yesterday by the
International Energy
International Energy Agency (IEA).
He led numerous studies related to the
international climate change
negotiations and national
climate policies, for example several evaluations of countries» performances in
climate change.
He can lead
climate policy development by using existing authority and can ensure that the U.S. has a strong position going into the next round of
international climate negotiations.
When it was pointed out how radical it was to advocate binding caps on emissions given the history of the
international climate negotiations, Hu responded philosophically, in reference to his own experience in
policy advocacy on various issues over the years:
This paper presents one example of how «the human face of
climate change» has been brought to an
international policy arena — the UNFCCC
climate negotiations — in a relatively short period of time by a coordinated effort of research and operational organizations
The CBAT tool allows visualization of any national response for reducing national ghg emissions commitments based upon the idea of contraction and convergence, one of several equity frameworks under discussion in
international climate negotiations, but is also of value for visualizing the
policy significance of other equity frameworks that are under discussion internationally.
In support of the Paris Agreement, science - based targets from leading companies demonstrate to
policy - makers the scale of emission reductions that are achievable to positively influence
international climate negotiations and domestic
climate policy.
The goal of these assessments is to inform
international policy and
negotiations on
climate - related issues.
CBDR has been the linchpin argument of China's
negotiation position in the
international climate change
policy arena (see previous post).
Now it can sit back, relax and watch the action from a coffee shop outside the United Nations conference, content that its efforts to derail U.S.
climate policy have effectively hamstrung the
international negotiations.
In previous entries, Ethicsandclimate.org examined the failure of the US media to communicate about: (a) the nature of the strong scientific consensus about human - induced
climate change, (b) the magnitude of greenhouse gas emissions reductions necessary to prevent catastrophic
climate change, (c) the practical significance for
policy that follows from understanding
climate change as essentially an ethical problem, (e) the consistent barrier that the United States has been to finding a global solution to
climate change in
international climate negotiations, and (f) the failure of the US media to help educate US citizens about the well - financed, well - organized
climate change disinformation campaign.
The need to turn up the visibility on the ethical and equitable unacceptability of national ghg commitments is not only important to get nations to increase their emissions reductions commitments in
international negotiations, it is also important to change the way
climate change
policies are debated at the national level when
climate change
policies are formed.
His recent work has focused on the development of provincial
climate change strategies, the green economy in Canada and internationally, energy
policy and the engagement of the private sector in
international climate negotiations.
International climate change
negotiations; China's
negotiation position on commitments; Carbon intensity; Emissions cap; Defined
policies and measures; Kyoto Protocol
«It's encouraging to see that China and the United States aren't going to hold HFCs hostage under
international climate negotiations,» said Mark Roberts,
international policy advisor for EIA.
RFF experts Arthur G. Fraas and Nathan Richardson examined the questions associated with implementing a carbon tax versus regulating emissions under the Clean Air Act, looking at issues including scope, cost - effectiveness, ability to generate revenue, and the impact on
international climate negotiations for either
policy approach — finding that «there's no easy answer to whether regulation or a carbon price is the better instrument.»
Just months before Lima hosts over 190 countries to advance
international climate negotiations at COP 20, Katoomba XX — Peru will identify opportunities for
climate policy and finance to align with other public and private investments and commitments to ensure that forests and other ecosystems continue to provide critical support for stable
climate and resilient -LSB-...]
In the paper, we look at this and nine other issues on which either
policy might come out ahead, including their scope, cost - effectiveness, ability to generate revenue, and their impact on
international climate negotiations.
Just months before Lima hosts over 190 countries to advance
international climate negotiations at COP 20, Katoomba XX — Peru will identify opportunities for
climate policy and finance to align with other public and private investments and commitments to ensure that forests and other ecosystems continue to provide critical support for stable
climate and resilient societies.
With another round of
international climate negotiations opening this week in Warsaw, Poland, and a new poll finding Canadians wanting leadership on the issue, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservative government have an opportunity to turn the tides on what has been so far a
policy trend in the wrong direction.
Richard Tol has an interesting new draft paper https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=wps-96-2016.pdf&site=24 that also draw attention to its lack of teeth: «The Paris Agreement discarded legally binding emission targets... the Paris Agreement obliges countries to have a
climate policy — but the word «intended» signifies that
climate policy is aspirational, while the words «nationally determined» specify that these aspirations are set by individual countries rather than through
international negotiations.»
Most importantly if the United States enacts a
climate policy it could begin to act like a real leader in
international negotiations and push other countries to do the same.
«Instead, we risk significant fines for missing EU targets as well as considerable reputational damage in view of the
international climate negotiations in Paris at the end of this year» said Sorley McCaughey, head of
policy and advocacy at Christian Aid.
«A Proposal to Integrate Price Mechanisms into
International Climate Negotiations,» Asia & the Pacific
Policy Studies, vol.
If NDCs are to become the long - term instrument for
international cooperation,
negotiation, and ratcheting up of ambitions to address
climate change, then they need to become more transparent and comparable, both with respect to mitigation goals, and to issues such as adaptation, finance, and the way in which NDCs are aligned with national
policies.
This new approach recognizes that continually deadlocked
international negotiations and failed domestic
policy proposals bring no
climate benefit at all.
We work at every level, from the
international climate negotiations to federal
policy to local ballot measures, to speed
climate solutions and the just transition to a clean energy world.
It's not as if the British or American public were ever really asked about their views before
international climate negotiations began, and thus there's no evidence that public opinion ever led to the failure of
climate policies.
The challenge for the Australian Government will be in providing leadership in its
climate change
policies and
international negotiations to include native forests and national parks as options for Indigenous sustainable development and carbon sequestration in Australia.
The proffered national legislative regime framework should be applied to all
climate change and water
policy and processes, including domestic and
international negotiations relating to carbon, water and environmental markets.