As a comment on the actual returns... this reminds me of some comments I saw to the effect that there is no sense in buying
international equity because international markets are highly correlated.
My return on Canadian equities should be higher than my return on US and
International equities because the dividends are not subject to withholding taxes.
Not exact matches
Equity market volatility has increased from the very low levels of last year, partly
because of concerns about the direction of
international trade policy in the United States.
One of the reasons Finland has consistently stayed at the top of
international rankings in education is
because it focuses on
equity; poorer schools receive more funding than those in more affluent neighborhoods, according to Finnish Lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland author Pasi Sahlberg, a visiting professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Balanced funds are great
because they don't require investors to figure out a host of complicated considerations, such as how much of your portfolio should be weighted in small cap versus
international equity funds.
International equities are the least tax - efficient (
because they are not eligible for the dividend tax credit and they have a higher yield than US
equities), so they should be the first candidate.
The whole purpose of having most of the assets invested in
equity, domestic plus
international, is to catch the growth of
equity at the early stage of the portfolio
because over the long - term,
equities have been proven to provide higher returns than fixed - income securities.
Because he has a reliable pension, he can afford to take more risk with his other investments by putting 70 % in Canadian, U.S. and
international equities, and the rest in bonds.
Because dividends from U.S. and
international equities are fully taxable, you generally want to tax - shelter foreign stocks with high yields.
The vantage point that we have
because we manage
international equities and global
equities is we can go anywhere in the world.
Although I can't give a specific allocation recommendation
because I don't know your personal circumstances, you should ideally have some in US
Equities, US Fixed Income,
International Equities, Commodities, of varying sizes to have adequate diversification «as defined by theory.»
As a result the
international community is not likely to respond with sufficient urgency and ambition unless greater awareness of the policy implications of the need to live within a carbon budget at levels required of nations
because of
equity and fairness considerations.
48 - 52) If there is any doubt that economic self - interest is not compatible with the idea of «
equity» it also is an unacceptable basis for establishing national climate change policies
because economic self - interest is also inconsistent with well established
international legal principles including:
As a report from the Global CCS institute points out, financing this new infrastructure will be difficult to accomplish using debt
because of uncertainty as to CO2 revenues — the report suggests that the World Bank and
international lending institutions could finance CCS projects, and «the role of national governments can be as guarantors,
equity partners or financial supporters.»
Yet, for the purposes of showing the utter inadequacy of existing US federal government and US state commitments, the C&C framework is very useful
because other
equity frameworks which have received some attention and respect in
international discussions of what
equity requires of nations would require even steeper reductions for the US and US state governments.
In fact, several observers of the negotiations have advised the
international community to abandon any direct discussion of «
equity»
because it is too contentious.
Because of these issues, the
International Private
Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines specifically state that all private equity and venture capital firms should use valuation multiples to value their portfolio companies, no
Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines specifically state that all private
equity and venture capital firms should use valuation multiples to value their portfolio companies, no
equity and venture capital firms should use valuation multiples to value their portfolio companies, not DCF.
Obtained
international arbitration award for venture capital firm for an additional 1,124,791 shares in Swedish public company
because it was shortchanged when its debt was converted to
equity in connection with the merger of a Dutch company into that Swedish company.