Corporate threats of
international trade law violations be damned.
Not exact matches
And this is the problem: the measures he proposes would and could only be enforced at the cost of massive
violations of human rights, and by dismantling the fragile but promising structures of technological know - how,
international law,
trade, and communication by which we are building up a still - feeble sense of what it means to be a single humanity on a single globe, under God and responsible for a common world.
For the past decade,
trade unions representing thousands of workers, student unions, faith groups and local councils have mobilised to end UK complicity with Israel's repeated
violations of
international law in its policies against Palestinians.
To call out workers on «essential services» for a national strike without any major
trade dispute with their direct employers will be tantamount to blatant
violation of our extant labour
laws and
international labour standards.
The immediate threat in the United States is that dirty energy lobbyists will effectively use hypothetical arguments of WTO or NAFTA illegality to chill congressional action and provide cover for U.S. legislators who are indebted to Big Oil, Big Coal and the LNG lobby for campaign contributions, even though
international trade law is not incorporated into U.S. domestic
law and
violations can not be enforced in U.S. domestic courts.
Campaign Against Arms
Trade v. Secretary of State for
Trade: Junior Counsel for the Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious
violations of
international humanitarian
law.
Campaign Against Arms
Trade v. Secretary of State for
Trade (High Court): Junior Counsel for the Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious
violations of
international humanitarian
law.