Your comment is very helpful because it suggests that
an internet publication policy should describe the hallmarks of an organization's identity or brand, something that few do.
Not exact matches
Consider Science's
policy, for example (emphasis added): «Distribution on the
Internet may be considered prior
publication and may compromise the originality of the paper as a submission to Science, although we do allow posting of research papers on not - for - profit preprint servers such as arixv.org.»
Dust - up Over ARSI: Stephen A. Henderson was so angry about the article on his program that appeared in the Feb. 21 issue of Education
Policy Analysis Archives, he called up the editor of the electronic journal and asked for it to be pulled from the
publication's
Internet site.
Well David is a great law teacher and a wonderful university administrator but his
publications show depth in securities and in the
policy issues surrounding the
Internet, but nothing on the constitution, except for a post-referendum piece on the economics of separation.
It is clearly a
policy decision rather than a linguistic one to decide that a text on an
internet site is published each time someone looks at it, though «
publication» in defamation law means communicate to anyone, even a single person, beyond the target of the defamation.