What
we interpret as a particle's mass is really the strength of its interaction with the Higgs field.
Things took a more interesting turn when physicists looked at excitations in the scalar field, which are
interpreted as particles.
Not exact matches
In consequence, with such models
as their objective, physicists frequently formulate the content of quantum mechanics in the language of classically conceived
particles and waves, because of certain analogies between the formal structures of classical and quantum mechanics... Accordingly, although a satisfactory uniformly complete interpretation of quantum mechanics based on a single model can not be given, the theory can be satisfactorily
interpreted for each concrete experimental situation to which the theory is applied.2
They
interpreted it
as the debris left behind when
particles of dark matter — the mysterious substance that makes up most of the matter in the universe yet refuses to interact with ordinary matter except through gravity — crashed together and annihilated each other in the centre of the Milky Way.
We usually
interpret them
as an insight into star - forming regions, with the illumination from young stars warming dust
particles and water molecules until they start to glow.
Physicists
interpreted it
as the debris from
particles of mysterious dark matter — thought to make up most of the stuff in the universe — crashing together and annihilating each other.
Nine sections address these fundamental questions and explore related topics, such
as how researchers collect and
interpret particle data, and how
particles decay into other
particles.
The researchers programmed powerful arrays known
as neural networks to serve
as a sort of hivelike digital brain in analyzing and
interpreting the images of the simulated
particle debris left over from the collisions.