Both state and federal courts have addressed the fourth amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure, but only the Supreme Court can
interpret constitutionality of such checkpoints.
Not exact matches
Judging the
constitutionality of laws by the Court's «appraisal of the wisdom of legislation,» as he accused the Court of doing in this case, «is an attribute of the power to make laws, not of the power to
interpret them.»
It affected the
constitutionality of fourteen articles of the Catalan Statute and «
interpreted» twenty - seven others.
While voucher opponents emphasized that the high court's refusal to review the case was not a ruling on the
constitutionality of vouchers for students in religious schools, some supporters said they were free to
interpret the court's action as a «green light» to push for Milwaukee - style plans elsewhere.
Has the U.S. Supreme Court ever taken a case
interpreting the Blaine Amendments or addressing their
constitutionality?
When Roosevelt attempted to pack the courts, the ABA sent some of its best lawyers to Washington to help those fighting FDR's plan
interpret questions of
constitutionality.
In this regard, I note the elimination of the presumption of
constitutionality, the metaphor of the living tree, and as Justice David Stratas identified last year in his keynote address, the court's repeated use of the purposive approach to
interpret and expand in different cases, substantive Charter rights that had already been the subject of a purposive analysis.
Underpinning all is the Constitution of the UAE which provides in Article 99 (inter alia) that the Federal Supreme Court of the UAE has jurisdiction to decide the
constitutionality of other laws, if so requested by a court in the UAE, to
interpret the constitution if so requested by any federal authority or the government of any Emirate and to decide, according to Federal law, on conflicts of jurisdiction between federal courts and local courts and between the courts of different Emirates.
Federal Law No. 10 of 1973 established the Federal Supreme Court and Articles 58 and 59 provided for issues of
constitutionality and interpretation of treaties to be referred to it by other courts for decision, with a reasoned decision of that court, where (as
interpreted) there is a serious issue of such a nature to be determined and the Court has made a reasoned determination in respect of it.
The court's decision to take on the legally dubious King v. Burwell case, she writes, positions the court on «the front lines of a partisan war,» and puts «not only the Affordable Care Act, but the court itself» in peril.Greenhouse contrasts this case with the previous challenge the court took up to Obamacare, pointing out that this time what's in question isn't the
constitutionality of the law, but its statutory interpretation — what did Congress intend and did the government
interpret and implement the statute correctly.