Sentences with phrase «interpret modeling results»

The objective of the workshop was to enable participants to understand and interpret modelling results (e.g. in the literature), not to become modellers themselves.

It's in the interpretation, rgb interpreted the model results in his own peculiar way, and then proceeded to say why he was wrong in that interpretation.

Not exact matches

«The original work with my model focused on reproducing, modeling, and interpreting results from existing experiments,» he said.

So being able to create and refine a computational fluid dynamics model — and interpret the results — has become very important to NASCAR teams.

At the Vienna University of Technology, theoretical models and large - scale computer simulations have been developed, in order to analyse and interpret the results.

Advanced theory and modeling methods are used to model and interpret the results.

This relatively new and still emerging way of seeing depends on taking MRI measurements with conventional millimeter - scale resolution, and developing theoretical models to interpret the resulting data in terms of changes occurring at the scale of microns.

This result has implications for interpreting disease phenotypes in animal models and humans.

Since the proposed model may be used in further studies and the results of the study could be interpreted by people who are not familiar with the peculiarity of nicotine / cotinine pharmacokinetics in mice, we attempted to estimate the level of nicotine (and e-liquid vapor) exposure used in the discussed study.

Through modeling, high school students identify variables in a situation, select an algebraic, geometric, statistical, or other mathematical way of solving the problem, perform operations on the variables, and interpret the results.

It may have achieved good results in the past through overfitting the model, which would interpret some of the noise of the past as a signal to return to the earlier analogy.

The results from the shuffled and the transformed data sets were interpreted as undermining the major gene theory for elbow dysplasia, although the mixed inheritance models provided a clearly better fit to the data than did the polygenic models for both HD and ED.

We discuss climate models a lot, and from the comments here and in other forums it's clear that there remains a great deal of confusion about what climate models do and how their results should be interpreted.

I think that is a little harsh, and we should not underestimate the importance of consistency in forecasting the general trends, nor the context it brings to how we interpret and present our present model results.

Throw in a collection of model results that are hard to interpret, and it is quite reasonable to understand why people (on both sides) are confused.

That's pretty much what the cp.net folks did, only instead of interpreting their results as casting doubt on the models» predictive capabilites, they interpreted their results as cause for greater alarm about global warming.

They haven't reached the point of development when we are sure that they are doing everything right for the right reasons, and so my instinct is to be very cautious in interpreting ocean model results that rely on shifts in the location of deep water production etc..

However, this does not mean prima facie that climate models are not useful; this is more about how we should design climate model experiments and interpret the results.

This is a very important topic indeed, and I hope that this discussion will not only lead to better mutual understanding but also indeed to a better insight in the way in which model results should be interpreted.

Steve, I agree that we need to do a better job of challenging the models with data and interpreting the results.

While it's one thing, he says, to employ ecological models to generate hypothesis for further testing, it's another matter entirely to present the results of these modeling exercises as predictions that policy makers and the public then interpret as forecasts.

As a result, the Cess climate sensitivity parameter should not be interpreted at its face value for estimates of model equilibrium climate sensitivity.

«If users believe the [GCM] models were never designed to meet this [spatial trend variation] standard, then our results will not be surprising, and could be interpreted merely as confirmation that this is not something that should be expected of climate models.

This should not be interpreted as a problem with the model and the analysis but rather a result of poor replication in the tree series.

But understanding models and their working is essential to interpreting results and their limitations.

We interpret the resulting reconstructions in the context of results from climate model simulations forced by estimated past changes in natural (solar and volcanic) radiative forcing.

Given my results, and the model through which I have interpreted them, it is completely valid to expect an «increased risk» of a double 6, even though I have not yet seen a trend.

To help interpret the results, Spencer uses a simple model.

Interpreting the results of modeling has been problematic.

This Measure Guideline describes how to model and interpret results of models for above grade walls.

If a model is approximate and has difficulties (like GCM's), or the results are difficult to interpret, that is reflected in the narratives and figures contained in the Validation document.

Age, sex, and ancestral proportion scores were entered in all of the models as covariates and were retained in the models regardless of their significance given the relevance of these potential confounding variables in interpreting the study results.

The grounded theory approach involves systematic review of qualitative data to allow novel ideas and theories to emerge from the observations rather than imposing existing theory or conceptual models to arrive at, or interpret, results.

Behaviour change is widely acknowledged to be difficult to achieve by those working in health promotion, and models of behaviour change developed to describe and support changes in health related lifestyles (smoking cessation, exercise participation) may be helpful in interpreting the results of this trial.38, 39 In particular, positive change followed by relapse is not uncommon.

Our multi-level modelling used maximum likelihood estimation, allowing for results to be interpreted as if there were no missing data, under the assumption that data were missing at random (Allison 2002; Raudenbush and Bryk 2002; Schafer and Graham 2002).

The resulting scores of the tri-dimensional model can be interpreted as psychomotor agitation, psychic anxiety, and depression in individual patient data or clinical investigations.

The here presented results can thus be interpreted in terms of the rumination arousal model [136].