Additionally in my case,
interpreting scripture through the lens of Christ is the key as previously mentioned by Jeremy.
Not exact matches
It's refreshing to read
through Bessey's spiritual and theological narrative peppered with thoughtful and insightful reflections on
interpreting Paul's biblical stance on women, and a beautiful litany of women in
scripture and world history whom God has equipped and used to further God's purposes in the world.
As I said last week, this general guide for
interpreting and applying the Bible makes sense to me.It's not about discounting the historical / grammatical method in favor of forcing a Jesus message into every last page, but simply looking at
Scripture through the lens of the gospel of Jesus Christ just as Christians should look at everything
through the lens of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
At this level the question has to be answered primarily in terms of revelation, as it comes to us
through Scripture and tradition,
interpreted with the guidance of the ecclesiastical magisterium.
When it comes to
scripture though we have a written record that yes must be read and therefore
interpreted but has been done so throughout the history of the Church and corrected by the same
through the oversight and guidance of God himself and it endures even till today.
It is proper to call him doctor of doctors, the agility of the spirit without which there would be no doctor who could give good instruction;
through the treasury of his writings they have enriched all they have gained; and
through his commentaries they have acquired the ability to
interpret; from him I have learned the habit of meditation of the divine word; his meditation became for me the guide towards
scripture; and he has elevated me towards the understanding of the books of the spirit.
Christian spirituality is based on the teaching of Jesus, as known
through the
Scriptures, and
interpreted by the Christian tradition, generally
through the authority of the churches.
Because God is communicating to mankind
through the
Scriptures in the Bible in a style that reeks with an obvious understood implication that the hearer / reader, mankind, has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject His call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts (some folk briefly refer to it as man's inherent - free - will capacity), I let the concept of mankind having this inherent ability be the precedence; and I
interpret difficult passages that can possibly be
interpreted to appear contradictory to that precedence (of mankind having inherent - free - will) in light of mankind having inherent - free - will capacity.
If the Augustinian lens
through which sin is
interpreted is that sin is too much love for self and not enough love for God or neighbor, then perhaps we need a more subtle analysis of the young men in the X chromosome study If
scripture is light — that we love because God first loved us (1 John 4:19)-- then all of us, these young men included, need first to experience love before the capacity to love either self or neighbor can develop.
My discomfort is not because Boyd's thesis is new, but because I think it ultimately violates one of his preliminary points, that all of
Scripture must be read and
interpreted through Jesus Christ, and especially
through Jesus Christ on the cross.
Multiple meanings
interpreted through forms of magic, folklore, empirical theories and conclusions, religious
scriptures and more can be found among cultures from all over the world.