Watch debates between Andrew Wilson, Brian McLaren and Steve Chalke on how we should
interpret scripture today, and read articles (at the bottom of the page) by...
Watch debates between Andrew Wilson, Brian McLaren and Steve Chalke on how we should
interpret scripture today, and read articles (at the bottom of the page) by all three for Premier Christianity.
Not exact matches
Today many christian sects have become cultish by taking liberties how to
interpret outdated and misunderstood
scriptures.
When it comes to
scripture though we have a written record that yes must be read and therefore
interpreted but has been done so throughout the history of the Church and corrected by the same through the oversight and guidance of God himself and it endures even till
today.
I'm not sure what exactly you're saying regarding the waffle, but, yes, all of
scripture is in fact «cultural» — it is placed first and foremost within the cultural context of the readers (the original, intended recipients) and any proper understanding of it and interpretation of it in our culture
today must first understand how it would have been received and
interpreted by those it was written to.
The issue from the outset has not been the need for new and better tools, but the solution of the fundamental anomaly of the field: the failure of the old paradigm so to
interpret Scripture as to enable personal and social transformation
today.
We dwell on this point because a real prophetic pulpit
today waits upon the release of the minister from a shackling hyper - caution about
interpreting the
Scriptures as the word of the Lord to our situation.
We have extremely lively debates and sometimes arguments, and we work with an alertness to the ways in which those
scriptures have been
interpreted in our communities over the centuries and
today.
MacArthur and other cessationists believe that the Gifts of the Spirit, specifically tongues and healing, do not operate
today (an assumption that I disagree with), so they
interpret all
scripture with that filter, that initial bias.
He believed the «power gifts» were no longer in operation, so he
interpreted scripture one way, while I believed the gifts are in operation
today, so I
interpret things differently.