Sentences with phrase «interpretation does»

This Interpretation does not contemplate that the broker must devote all or even a majority of his time to his real estate business or derive any particular percentage of his income from such business.

This Interpretation does not, however, preclude a Board from reasonably limiting the number of REALTOR ® or REALTOR - ASSOCIATE ® Members of the same firm or firms having common ownership who may hold elective or appointive positions.

This subsection contains a general statement of how the Tribunal is to operate but as a matter of statutory interpretation does not override the specific provisions of s 76 which, for the reasons already explained, the Tribunal regards as mandatory (see South Australian Commissioner for Prices and Consumer Affairs v Charles Moore (Aust) Limited (and others) 1997 138 CLR 449 (per Gibbs J at 462).

While these (PARs, CARs, STARs, etc.) can be useful for people to think through and practice articulating their key accomplishments, the literal interpretation doesn't necessarily translate well to powerful resume content.

This interpretation does not make sense on many levels.

Judge Reeves» interpretation does not limit prohibited statements to a pending trial or hearing, and includes letters or statements made by lawyers concerning legislative or executive branch bodies as well as judicial officers or public legal officers, which were made after the final ruling.

Despite this, I am going to take us to the dissent written by Mr. Justice Cromwell, who has an administrative law background and explains in this case what statutory interpretation does.

But what the broadest reasonable interpretation does is try to test for ambiguity in the patent language so it can be amended.

Such an interpretation does not take into account that the aid is in fact an advantage which is enjoyed by an undertaking throughout time and until it is removed with recovery, and that — from this perspective — the moment in which the contract was granted does not have particular relevance.

But this figure shows that such an interpretation does not hold.

But even that interpretation doesn't make sense.

Unless and until someone can actually show my interpretation does not make sense, there is no basis for these criticisms leveled against Andrew Lacis.

Unfortunately, that interpretation does not hold up.

But this interpretation doesn't fully capture the experiences of young people, according to a new article by Gretchen Brion - Meisels and Bernice Raveche Garnett.

«Showing that one aspect of the Libet experiment can be open to interpretation does not mean that all arguments against conscious free will need to be ejected.»

To the lawyers reading this article I say the following: if this interpretation does not sit well with your legal conscience, then consider that the Supreme Court has departed from its previous ruling in the previous Abu Ramadan case, as it is entitled so to do.

Furthermore, those who now belong with us in acceptance of this gospel and these corollaries, ought to have reasonable freedom to interpret the how of the historical credenda in a fashion meaningful to them, provided always that their interpretation does not negate the faith by which the Christian fellowship lives.

Bill — Telling us what you believe based on a modern - day born again Christian interpretation does not make you right.

However, this interpretation does not allow for any further subjective experiences or subjective change.

Finally, the static interpretation does not eliminate becoming; it merely relegates it into the subjective, «phenomenal» realm.

Where official interpretation does not hold sway, unofficial interpretation takes on the character of poetry.

As I wrote, Christian interpretation does have a legitimate bearing on translation.

The liberal interpretation does not favour the use of preferential measures («positive discrimination») in situations of social inequality.

Hi Jeremy, Great article however your interpretation doesn't match up with Lukes account in chapter 22 where Jesus actually requested «Remove this cup from me» - KJV.

It is connected with God's whole use of law, of guilt, and of grace, but Brunner's interpretation does not arrive at the determinative nature of the image of God in man.

@hippypoet» people you mentioned are those who interpret only» @Chad «So interpretation doesn't seek to understand what the author was trying to say?

So if our interpretation doesn't lead us to a cessation interpretation.

Apart from the initial conviction that knowledge is consummated in communion the dialectic of interpretation does not climax in transcendence but only reversal, in an infinite series of reversals: the antithesis simply becomes a new thesis, which is displaced by a new antithesis, ad infinitum.

For on this interpretation it does matter which of the disjuncts is true: p logically implies «God exists.»

«Interpretation does not mean or require departure from the tradition,» he writes, «Though justified discontinuity is not illegitimate, but rather that the Scripture is capable of unanticipated relevancy through reinterpretation» (CC 61).

Now, this is one possible interpretation — though notice, even this interpretation doesn't fully support Calvinism, for it still grants humans the freedom to come up with their own plans!

Of course, an existentialist interpretation does not ignore this other relation, but, as Bultmann's essay shows, the importance of the world in that interpretation is limited to providing the stage for human life.

Just because you don't agree with their interpretation doesn't mean they are wrong and you are right.

Please discuss some passages from the bible that contradict his arguments, and then I can consider whether your interpretation does.

The interpretation does describe the situation of the later church, and indeed of all generations of church history; but it describes also the situation that confronted Jesus himself.

It has to be emphasized that Bonhoeffer's non-religious interpretation does not cast aside the importance of prayer, sacraments etc..

To read Scripture without a commitment to a historical - grammatical approach to interpretation does not guarantee that everyone will connect the dots (doctrinally) as they should.

In an article on Tillich's theological method, Jacob Taubes states that Tillich eschatologizes ontology and ontologizes eschatology.13 I submit, to the contrary, that this interpretation does not apply at all to Tillich's ontology as it is fully elaborated in his Systematic Theology.

'' Statutory interpretation does not get much simpler,» the appeals court said in siding with plaintiff John Taylor, a drone hobbyist from Washington, DC.

The vast majority of Christian interpretations don't have revocation.

A plurality of interpretations does not negate the possibility of there being an interpretation that is objectively better than others, no more than many people claiming they're the Queen of England prevents only one person being, in actually, the Queen.

Although my interpretations do not reflect the literal first century meanings at every point, they do represent what I believe Jesus would mean (in the context of his concern for persons) were he speaking in our day.

Language is not a barrier, since Anastasia International offers live interpretation done by professional interpreters.

Angular visions of rain, clay creations both miniscule and massive, lounging skeletons among everyday objects suspended in various states... Once inside and truly immersed, others ubiquitous visual interpretations did little to sway the impact of that first hand encounter.

Although I understand you disagree with his views, the existence of contrary interpretations does not negate Christopher Booker's right to offer his own.

In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted the trial judge «made many errors» stating the original interpretation did not take into consideration that a two - step process involving consultation by both the province and the federal government is unnecessary, as the treaty right is protected.

These interpretations do not seem to accord with the intention of the drafters of the Convention which, as shown in the explicit terms of article V (1)(d), was to ensure that the parties» agreement should prevail over the provisions — mandatory or not — of the law of the seat.

How many lawyer / management / librarian / technology meetings have you been to where the terms in question mean different things to different people and often the different interpretations don't come to light until well into an increasingly confusing discussion?

Here, the Commission, with the benefit of its expertise, chose the interpretation it did.

A good poem may inspire creative interpretations, but these interpretations do not buttress its overall quality.