Sentences with phrase «interpretation is in error»

(23) What must be said is that some biblical interpretation is in error.

Not exact matches

In the case of apparent contradictions and errors, we are assured that the true interpretation of these passages, this higher understanding, will eliminate these.

Is the Catholic traditional interpretation of the Bible one of those which can be known on the basis of our present study of the Bible to be in serious error?

Same principle, except in my case you can verify the lack of errors, in yours it's an interpretation.

The point, rather, is that Steven Weinberg and people like him are committing a grave error in historical interpretation when they posit a causal relationship between secularization and the advance of modern science.

Craig Gross, your interpretation (equating being overweight with being sexually immoral in terms of sinfulness) is seriously, seriously in error.

The error arises from a wrong interpretation of the obvious fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense of the value of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given in that selfhood.

But, he said, «the latter history of this culture is not so much a debate between these two schools of thought as a rebellion of romanticism, materialism and psychoanalytic psychology against the errors of rationalism, whether idealistic or naturalistic, in its interpretation of human nature.

Let us examine then two of the most powerful statements of it, those of Bishop Anders Nygren and of Reinhold Niebuhr, for I believe them to be in error and that error underlies much of the distortion in the Christian interpretation of man's predicament into which we are being led.

Otherwise, the descendants of the Reformers would find themselves in exactly the error of which Karl Barth so relentlessly accused the Church of Rome — not permitting the Bible to remain free, sovereign over all ecclesiastical interpretations of it, so that the church may be always and only a hearer, not the master, of the word of God.

He tries, in this collection of Writings, to separate what belongs to Revelation from what is the product of error or human interpretation.

Further, most are absolutely certain that their particular interpretations are correct, and that the many hundreds of faith groups which teach opposing beliefs are in error.»

In his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not facIn his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not facin a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not fact.

Most of what we experience in conscious perception is a product of interpretation and referential judgment, so that the possibility of error is introduced.

As such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just as Whitehead maintains.

This would not mean that Scripture is in error, only that our interpretation of it was faulty.

smh What really cracks me up is that you have set yourself up as the arbiter of what is or is not necessary for salvation according to your interpretation, and those doctrines with which you disagree 1) are in error, and 2) not from God.

In case you don't believe what has been shown to you here, go talk to a rabbi — they should be able to show you the error of your Isaiah translation and interpretation.

Clearly this isn't even a divisive issue as the majority of replies realize the error she's made in her far flung interpretations.

Because we are imperfect and fallible and constantly making errors in judgment and perception, there is no universal single authoritative use or interpretation of the Bible.

It is provided «as is» and as such, the accuracy of same is not warranted in any way... Neither Triad Retail Media UK Limited nor its publisher make any representations as to the accuracy or efficacy of the information provided nor do they assume any responsibility for errors, omissions or contrary interpretation of the subject matter herein.»

Lehane said that the data was «improperly obtained,» and AirDNA backed his criticism of the report, noting in a statement that Stringer's office did not seek assistance in interpreting the data, «leading to several crucial errors in his interpretation of the numbers.»

Among the areas determined to be flawed and in need of more research are: accuracy and error rates of forensic analyses, sources of potential bias and human error in interpretation by forensic experts, fingerprints, firearms examination, tool marks, bite marks, impressions (tires, footwear), bloodstain - pattern analysis, handwriting, hair, coatings (for example, paint), chemicals (including drugs), materials (including fibers), fluids, serology, and fire and explosive analysis.

Lead author of the research Dr Kelly Redeker from the Department of Biology at the University of York said «As microbial activity and its influence on its local environment has never been taken into account when looking at ice - core gas samples it could provide a moderate source of error in climate history interpretations.

Errors in the interpretation of the signals that the tissue sends to the immune cells are the basis of defective wound healing and play a still poorly defined role in the establishment of autoimmune responses and in the most common pregnancy complications, such as recurrent abortion, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction.

The above information is from my interpretations from posts on Martin Berkhan's Blog, www.leangains.com, as well as much trial and error to fill in the blanks that he intentionally left out.

More crucially, he makes the error of assuming that the perspectives of Poppy and Leigh himself are interchangeable — an interpretation that, in my view, ignores a considerable portion of the film's irony and pathos.

The 56 % meeting or exceeding standard for CA's grade 11 E / LA result was an outlier with blinking red lights that defies meaningful interpretation other than a grossly discrepant cut score (to the low side) or some other test development flaw (such as an inadequate item bank for a computer - adaptive test) or an error in the test administration or scoring process, or some weird effect due to the increased number of grade 11 students with scores since EAP moved from voluntary to mandatory in 2015 [which usually would involve a decrease in scores, a reasonable interpretation for the decrease in Math EAP scores this year, rather than an increase in scores].

The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report — and any errors — are the authors» alone.

Take for example a book on American politics, not because that kind of book is fun to read, but because such a book always has two characteristics: a strong point of view that practically begs for counter arguments, and debatable errors either in actual facts or in the interpretation of them.

Taking the absolute worst - case possible interpretation of your example above (which would be if BookBub's «ranking effect» impacted all promoted books in the same direction, and was therefore additive), we would have 167 sales x 300 books = 50,000 sales worth of error.

The association of Photorealism to Trompe L'oeil is a wrongly attributed comparison, an error in observation or interpretation made by many critics of the 1970s and 1980s.

If there is no reason to assume that the errors would be in the same direction, then I would not fault them for their interpretation.

So, while my over interpretation has lead to a clear error in relationshipt to the dominant source of Greenland precipitation by placing it to far north, it does not effect the conclusion that Greenland ice cores are a regional, not a hemispheric or global proxy.

This is invariably necessary b / c multivariate regression outputs (typically reported in tables of regression coefficients and associated precision measures such as t - statistics, standard errors, and stupefying «p - values») invariably defy meaningful interpretation by even stats - sophisticated readers.

Numerous «interpretation errors» have included within them the «greenhouse theory» making «use» of Energy in actuality existent as secondary photons, but (incorrectly) being given «treatment» as «representative of heat».

It is possible to recast an OLS - regression, normal - error - distribution based study in Bayesian terms, but there is generally little point in doing so since the regression model and error distributions uniquely define the form of the prior distribution appropriate for a Bayesian interpretation.

Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political issues — is just not credible.

I showed an elementary error in which two interpretations of the same quantities was evident in one of the various examples used.

Supplying an alternative theory only makes sense when the underlying components of the original theory have no errors but only the interpretation of those components is in question.

In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted the trial judge «made many errors» stating the original interpretation did not take into consideration that a two - step process involving consultation by both the province and the federal government is unnecessary, as the treaty right is protected.

[17] The Teachers» Federation asserts that the judgment is the product of (i) fundamental errors of law regarding interpretation and application of the duty of fair representation, and (ii) a multiplicity of factual errors involving findings not based on the evidence and contrary to the evidence, which are palpable in nature and overriding in effect.

[17] The Teachers» Federation asserts that the judgment is the product of (i) fundamental errors of law regarding interpretation and application of the duty of fair representation, and (ii) a multiplicity of factual errors involving findings not based on the evidence and contrary to the evidence, which are palpable in nature and overriding in effect... [more]

Analogizing a judge's role in claim construction with a similar role in interpreting contracts or deeds, the Court observed that these subsidiary findings are subject to review for clear error, even when the ultimate interpretation of the documents receives de novo review.

The Chief Justice: «The defence of officially induced error of law is intended to protect a diligent person who first questions a government authority about the interpretation of legislation so as to be sure to comply with it and then is prosecuted by the same government for acting in accordance with the interpretation the authority gave him or her.

District courts get some deference in their claim construction holdings — that is, factual conclusions underpinning a claim interpretation under the law are reviewed for clear error, not de novo, thanks to Teva Pharma.

River logic can be used to build a case against an opponent, to ferret out the logical errors in new statutes, or to automate the interpretation of a particularly complex statute.

Because these three errors fell squarely within the list of extricable errors of law referred to in Sattva Captial Corp v. Creston Moly Corp., no deference was owed to the motion judge's interpretation of the contractual documents.

It analyses the most common themes in clinical care, specifically errors with fetal heart rate monitoring and cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation, a theme which has long been highlighted as an area for improvement.

Dean is a Winnipeg - based lawyer and partner with Fillmore Riley LLP who practises primarily in the areas of general civil and commercial litigation and insurance law, covering such areas as general insurance defence matters, commercial liability insurance, professional errors and omissions, subrogation and policy interpretation.