Frequent participation in religious ceremony (e.g., attending church or mosque) and
literal interpretation of scripture was associated with more traditional gender role attitudes.
In the nineteenth century a growing secular rationalism, such new sciences as geology and Darwinism with their implications for
traditional interpretations of the Scriptures with regard to human origins, the rise of biblical criticism, and so forth, all raised fundamental challenges to accustomed ways of conceiving of Christianity and especially biblical authority.
For constructive dialog to happen, Christians must stop conflating differences
in interpretation of Scripture with differences in commitment to Scripture.
In hopes of a deeper understanding of God, we study such subjects as Jesus Christ and Israel, scripture in tradition, the history of practices
of interpretation of scripture and practices of response to God in worship, moral responsibility and institution building.
If there's a priesthood of believers and everyone is supposed to rely on scripture only, and ultimately on his or her
own interpretation of scripture only, then there's a real danger that the passions and pressures of the day, as well as the prevailing popular culture, will find their way into the hearts and minds of those who continue to think of themselves as serious believers.
This way of speaking about the authority of Scripture stands in contrast to how it is often spoken of among Christians, as a phrase invoked to shut down conversation and bolster one
particular interpretation of Scripture.
Would Noll agree that his narrative implies that Protestant commitment to individual
interpretation of Scripture makes a Protestant biblical Christendom impossible to sustain?
Fedex.In my opinion christianity has and is doing a lot of damage to sincere followers of messiah and those who don't know him yet.thanks for your concern.I think that there is too
much interpretation of scripture which is being used to support christianty.personally I don't believe christianty is scriptural.read some of your other comments and you have some good thoughts.
Moreover, we can engage the complex and unruly body of teachings called the Nicene tradition and, after analysis, determine it confused, ill - developed, and in need of correction by a more
thorough interpretation of Scripture.
The «you have heard it said — but I say» format in the Sermon on the Mount is not a simple «Old Testament or Jesus» antithesis but rather a question of what is the
proper interpretation of the Scriptures.
That might be controversial, especially in light of our love in «Protestant» circles for individual men like Martin Luther who held to his
private interpretation of Scripture (but was it that?)
Phrases with «interpretation of scripture»