The court had to decide the correct
interpretation of a statutory provision, 18 U.S.C. sec. 1028A (a)(1), which states that:
And in this case ATB argued for correctness on the basis that the Commissioner's decision engages in
the interpretation of statutory provisions which are outside of her specialization, and also that the interpretation of the scope of the disclosure exemption is a true question of jurisdiction.
[96] With respect to administrative decisions, such as the one at issue in Canadian Human Rights Commission, which involve
an interpretation of a statutory provision, a standard close to correctness will be appropriate.
Where there is more than one permissible
interpretation of a statutory provision, it is for the statutory decision - maker to choose the interpretation that would best further its policy objectives.
Also in 2011, the SCC held that a decision may imply a particular
interpretation of a statutory provision, even if the decision - maker has not expressed an opinion on that provision's meaning (Alberta Teachers» Association, 2011 SCC 61).
Not exact matches
Scalia believed his job in education cases was to read and apply the text
of the law, and not allow his personal views on education to come in through the backdoor via free - ranging
interpretations of vague
statutory and constitutional
provisions.
Often in response to requests from individuals or entities, agencies will respond to requests for
interpretation of particular regulatory or
statutory provisions, sometimes in response to particular factual situations, and generally by letter.
Although the Court
of Appeal shared the sympathies which Mr Justice McCombe had previously expressed for police officers «who have to confront day in and day out the realities
of life rather than the black letter law which this court has to apply» (see Bonner v DPP [2004] EWHC 2415 (Admin), [2004] All ER (D) 74 (Oct)-RRB-, it recognised, as indeed it must, that if the law were to be changed, it was to be achieved by Parliament using the legislative process rather than by the courts according the
statutory provision a «liberal» (or illiberal)
interpretation.
«Faced with a difficult point
of statutory interpretation and conflicting judicial authority, the Tribunal adopted a dictionary meaning
of «expenses» and articulated what it considered to be a beneficial policy outcome rather than engage in an interpretative process taking account
of the text, context and purpose
of the
provisions in issue.»
«The petitioners seek relief on the basis that the production
provisions of s. 26
of the LPA, when considered in light
of common law
statutory interpretation principles and in light
of provisions of the Charter, do not apply to them,» said Butler, in the ruling.
If asked why results were different from what you'd hoped for or predicted, give an honest explanation: «My
interpretation of XX (point
of law, precedent,
statutory provision, contract term etc.) was incorrect» or «I believed that we had a reasonable chance
of success, because
of XX reason, and so I recommended XX course
of action.
Seyfarth Synopsis: On April 11, 2018, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed into law HB 2238, which amended the state's administrative procedure laws to remove «Chevron Deference,» so that for disputes involving state administrative law, courts will not be required to defer to an agency's
interpretation of an ambiguous
statutory provision.
... In a proceeding brought by or against the regulated party, the court shall decide all questions
of law, including the
interpretation of a constitutional or
statutory provision or a rule adopted by an agency, without deference to any previous determination that may have been made on the question by the agency.
Even if section 2802 could be stretched that far, it would be «trumped» anyway by the specific
provisions of Government Code section 996.4 under the «specific over general» cannon
of statutory interpretation.
The varying
interpretations given by the courts and human rights tribunals to the
statutory provisions has led to a very complicated set
of cases and principles on employment and discrimination.
The Court was tasked with interpreting various
statutory and regulatory
provisions, each
of which had been the subject
of conflicting
interpretations in the lower courts.
[26] The obligation
of the administrative delegate is to apply the Dreidger template so as to determine whether the
statutory provision is open to two or more reasonable
interpretations (Dunsmuir's range
of reasonable outcomes).
The established principle
of law is that where a
statutory provision has received an
interpretation or endorsement and the same
provision is repeated in a subsequent legislation, the legislature is deemed to have adopted the decision
of the Court.
The House
of Lords decided that clear statements made in Parliament concerning the purpose
of legislation in course
of enactment may be used by the court as a guide to the
interpretation of ambiguous
statutory provisions.
As a matter
of statutory interpretation, it is presumed that the
provisions of legislation are meant to work together as part
of a functional whole.
This required the arbitrator to make factual findings concerning the relationship between the claimants and the insured, in accordance with the arbitrator's
interpretation of the relevant insurance policy and
statutory provisions.
Finally, the Board did not have expertise in
statutory interpretation but rather in «complex matters
of valuation
of property», a point underscored by form
of the
statutory appeal clause: «While the Board may have familiarity with the application
of the assessment
provisions of the Act, the legislature has recognized that the Board's specialized expertise does not necessarily extend to general questions
of law and jurisdiction» (at para. 87).
Statutory interpretation can be tough in any circumstance, but the Clean Air Act is a particularly daunting beast, with hundreds
of partially overlapping and somewhat intertwined
provisions and no simple organizing principles or themes.
The primary justifications provided by commenters for restricting the scope
of covered individually identifiable health information under the regulation were that such an approach would reduce the complexity, burden, cost, and enforcement problems that would result from a rule that treats electronic and non-electronic records differently; would appropriately limit the rule's focus to the security risks that are inherent in electronic transmission or maintenance
of individually identifiable health information; and would conform these
provisions of the rule more closely with their
interpretation of the HIPAA
statutory language.
But by relying on the constitutional - avoidance canon
of statutory interpretation, the Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that detained aliens have a
statutory right to periodic bond hearings under the
provisions at issue.
When examining
statutory interpretation principles, the phrase, «related proceedings,» could not be interpreted to broaden the scope
of the unlicensed
provision of legal services.
While I still think I'm right as a conceptual matter that impossibility preemption generally turns on conduct rather than liability, the fact that it'd render the immunity
provision a nullity is a problem since the question is ultimately one
of statutory interpretation.
The case was decided on the basis
of principles
of statutory interpretation applicable where two legislative
provisions conflict with one another.
The relevant objects
of the Act are set out in s. 3 and are quoted above in that section
of these reasons dealing with
statutory interpretation under the heading «Substantive
provisions of the Act».
This subsection contains a general statement
of how the Tribunal is to operate but as a matter
of statutory interpretation does not override the specific
provisions of s 76 which, for the reasons already explained, the Tribunal regards as mandatory (see South Australian Commissioner for Prices and Consumer Affairs v Charles Moore (Aust) Limited (and others) 1997 138 CLR 449 (per Gibbs J at 462).