Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 (35026) The historical approach that contractual
interpretation of a written contract is always a question of law should be abandoned.
Not exact matches
Contractual
interpretation involves issues
of mixed fact and law as it is an exercise in which the principles
of contractual
interpretation are applied to the words
of the
written contract, considered in light
of the factual matrix
of the
contract.
Applying a contextual approach,
writes Rose, «the court approved the motions judge's comments that «[t] here was no intent to
contract out
of the ESA in fact; to the contrary, the intent to apply the ESA is manifest» and held that «the motion judge's
interpretation of the
contract is entitled to deference.
Under those circumstances, the
interpretation of written documents had to be considered questions
of law because only the judge could be assured to be literate and therefore capable
of reading the
contract (Hall, at p. 126; and Lewison, at pp. 173 - 74).
I agree that the best way to avoid such disputes is in a
written employment
contract itself, but the
interpretation of «fair» is still subject to statutory minimums, and there are many employment situations that are far from «clear.»
Contractual
interpretation involves issues
of mixed fact and law as it is an exercise in which the principles
of contractual
interpretation are applied to the words
of the
written contract, considered in light
of the factual matrix.
Good employer practice should include obtaining legal advice regarding the
interpretation of any
written employment
contract before a lay - off or termination is considered.
Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Promises that Will Be Enforced Chapter 3: Third - Party Beneficiary
Contracts Chapter 4: Making an Enforceable
Contract Chapter 5: The Requirement
of Writing Chapter 6: Remedies for Breach
of Contract Chapter 7: Performance, Non-Performance and Excuses Chapter 8:
Interpretation and Risk Allocation Chapter 9: The Control
of Contract Power Chapter 10: Illegal
Contracts
It relied on another recent decision
of the Supreme Court in Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, where Wagner J. (as he then was)
wrote that
interpretation of a standard form
contract can, in certain situations, be a question
of law subject to correctness review standard (the stricter and less deferential review standard).
These latest two stories deal with a couple
of clients who had money «stolen from them» (my
interpretation of events because both complainants had to pay two selling commissions each) by their registrants / brokerages because the courts were forced to enforce the
written terms
of those
contracts.