Shannon Hall quotes Michael Hall as saying that the main problem with Hugh Everett's many -
worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics comes from confusion over what constitutes a measurement (21 January, p 28).
Their results rule out a large class
of interpretations of quantum mechanics and suggest that if there is any objective description of the world, the famous wave function is part of it: Schrödinger's cat actually is both dead and alive.
Here was what Bell had been groping for, on and off since his student days: some quantitative means of distinguishing Bohr's
interpretation of quantum mechanics from other coherent, self - consistent possibilities.
According to the
orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics (although «orthodox» seems an odd description for such a radical world view), subatomic entities such as electrons or photons are either waves or particles — depending on how the physicist chooses to observe them.
Niedra broke with many other scientists in a letter following an interview, writing that while Mills's theory butts up against
popular interpretations of quantum mechanics, «in fact, however, quantum mechanics may permit such [hydrino electron] levels.»
I think this illustrates that
the interpretation of quantum mechanics has by no means been settled.
[2] P. MITTELSTAEDT,
The interpretation of quantum mechanics and the measurement process, Cambridge UP., 1998, p. 47 - 57, 62 - 64.
In our May 2011 Cutting Edge column and our November 2005 editorial we applied this insight to low - level, or subatomic, physics, using De Broglie's
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
The many interacting worlds idea echoes an earlier many - worlds
interpretation of quantum mechanics, thought up by theorist Hugh Everett in the 1950s, in which the universe splits into pairs of parallel universes every time a wave function collapses.
Everett's idea is now known as the «many worlds»
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
People don't want to change the Schrödinger equation, leading them to what's called the «many worlds»
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph's theorem, known as PBR, uses a sophisticated mathematical argument to show that
any interpretation of quantum mechanics that doesn't treat the wave function as a real object invariably leads to results that contradict quantum theory itself.
In
some interpretations of quantum mechanics, the universe only comes into being when we observe it, and the act of observing it actually determines what happens next by forcing reality into one of many possible outcomes.
The standard rules of quantum mechanics work extremely well, but, given that there are still open questions regarding
the interpretation of quantum mechanics, scientists are not sure whether the current rules are the final story.
In 1927, the French physicist Louis de Broglie, who first proposed that particles could behave like waves, developed
an interpretation of quantum mechanics called pilot wave theory, where waves and particles are both equally real.
Quantum physics is notorious for implying the existence of multiple realities, as articulated in the «many worlds»
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
«That is, it seems worth considering yet
another interpretation of quantum mechanics.»
That attitude has been called the «shut up and calculate»
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
It does not depend on exotic theories such as the multiverse or the «many worlds»
interpretation of quantum mechanics, in which the universe constantly bifurcates.
In his profile of Hugh Everett and his many - worlds
interpretation of quantum mechanics, «The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett,» Peter Byrne states that Bryce S. DeWitt «swung around 180 degrees [on Everett's theory] and became its most devoted champion,» thus implying that previously DeWitt had a negative opinion of the theory.
And as it happens, one
interpretation of quantum mechanics that used to be somewhat obscure has suddenly become popular because it's better adapted for explaining quantum computation, at least to human brains.
Brian Greene explains the «many worlds»
interpretation of quantum mechanics (5 February, p 30) by stating «if quantum mechanics predicts...
This echoes
an interpretation of quantum mechanics based on the work of David Bohm, long considered a maverick, but whose work is now seen as a serious alternative to the standard «Copenhagen Interpretation» of quantum mechanics.
«To me it seems obvious that if ER = EPR is true it is a very big deal, and it must affect the foundations and
interpretation of quantum mechanics.»
Two weeks ago, I blogged about David Bohm's
interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Einstein's theories of relativity and the Copenhagen
interpretation of quantum mechanics are the most widely known examples in which commonsense views about space, matter, energy, and motion are rejected.
An illustration showing Schrödinger's cat experiment, which Schrödinger came up with in 1935 to discredit what he felt were apparent contradictions in
the interpretation of quantum mechanics.