Not exact matches
There are three rules
of contract construction that govern the
interpretation of disputed
contract language.
By way
of background, the test for contractual
interpretation is what a reasonable person, having all background knowledge which would have been available to the parties, would understand the
language in a
contract to mean.
The Court confirmed that where the
language of the policy is ambiguous, general rules
of contract interpretation apply.
The Court found that the
interpretation of insurance
contracts involves a unique blend
of the general principles
of interpretation applicable to all
contracts and the unique principles applicable in the insurance setting.22 While courts have found that the «
language of the policy» is the most important factor in determining whether coverage is granted or excluded, courts have found that where there is genuine ambiguity or doubt, the duty to defend ought to be resolved in favour
of the insured.23 Similarly other insurance law principles should be considered, such as the principle that coverage provisions should be construed broadly and exclusion clauses should be construed narrowly.24 It was this last principle that the Court looked to in making a decision in this case.
The Court accepted that the parties did not intend to
contract out
of the minimum standards
of the ESA and held that the plaintiff's challenges to the
contract «represent [ed] either strained
interpretations or [were] easily and reasonably cured using the curative
language contained in the employment agreement itself».
It could be that someone at the broadcasting authority is being more crabbed in their
interpretation of how the licensing
contract language applies to the modern circumstances than is really reasonable.
The
language used in this Consulting Agreement will be deemed to be the
language chosen by the Consultant and Client to express their mutual intent, and no rule
of law or
contract interpretation that provides that in the case
of ambiguity or uncertainty a provision should be construed against the draftsperson will be applied against either the Consultant or Client.
This website does not provide detailed information or
interpretation of specific insurance
contracts, policies and / or policy
language, and is not designed to be a substitute for such information in terms
of claims handling and / or settlement.
«Options for the buyers moving forward (cancellation or renegotiation
of the
contract; reimbursement or withholding
of escrow) are subject to legal
interpretation of the
contracts and the
language contained therein.»