It can not come from an obscurantist who behaves as though nothing had happened and is content to repeat the shibboleths of a short - circuited dogmatism, or to take over the exegesis of Luther naïvely and uncritically, to say nothing of the allegorical
interpretations of the Rabbis.
Not exact matches
In Jewish tradition, we frequently speak in terms
of «Written Torah» (the text
of the Hebrew Scriptures as they have come down to us) and «Oral Torah» (the ensuing centuries
of conversations and
interpretations of our sages and
rabbis, which are also considered to be holy.)
In the
rabbis»
interpretations, «uncleanness» could denote an act
of adultery (cf. Matt.
He offered
interpretations of the Law
of Moses as other
rabbis did, as well as some criticisms
of it on which they would not have ventured.
After all, there was considerable latitude
of interpretation among accredited
rabbis — more latitude at that period than in the reformed Judaism which emerged after the debacle
of AD.
Indeed it seems strange at first sight that the prophet should also have been a
rabbi, that
interpretation of the Law and eschatologica1 preaching should belong together.
From this time come the disputes over
interpretation of the Law, in which they appealed to the authority
of Jesus and represented him as the
rabbi which he had never been.
Essentially, the church was formed by Rome thanks to the salesmanship and editorial skills
of Paul, who by his writings and
interpretations of the various fables and stories surrounding the Jewish
rabbi known as Jesus, was able to «de-Jew» those earliest Christian beliefs, thereby making them into something more palatable to the masses, and ultimately to the Roman Emperor Constantine, whose mother converted to the new religion before her death.
In case you don't believe what has been shown to you here, go talk to a
rabbi — they should be able to show you the error
of your Isaiah translation and
interpretation.