(3) If many stories may be
interpreted as myth, how are we to protect the historical basis of Christian belief?
Not exact matches
Having created the
myth of the black's extraordinary sexual prowess, the white male
interprets such a case
as an affront to his ego, his virility and his property.
Such absolutisms included a heroic
myth about U.S. history
interpreted as the rise of «the successful male white Protestant, whose features were turned into ideals for the entire human race.»
Now I agree to stay within these bounds of meaning
as long
as we are simply trying to understand Bultmann, or to
interpret him; but the moment we get beyond these tasks to the larger constructive task of a postliberal theology, I want to take issue with this way of dealing with
myth.
This is a very important point, and it largely depends on how we
interpret the word «resurrection»
as to what we would expect to find if the
myth were to include an appropriate description of it.
His book The Word
as Truth
Myth:
Interpreting Modern Theology is to be published this year (1997) by Westminster John Knox.
For the theologian will never be able to
interpret the pagan
myths in the same way
as the pagan historian of religion does.
The Easter event,
as interpreted by the
myth of resurrection, has inaugurated the long awaited reconstitution of all things.
Because Jung wrote about
myth and considered all religions worthy of study and respect, many have wrongly assumed that he
interpreted religion
as myth in the sense that it is deluded belief, something childish and meant only for the unthinking masses.
As far as the creation myth goes, I actually interpret it as the birth of teachin
As far
as the creation myth goes, I actually interpret it as the birth of teachin
as the creation
myth goes, I actually
interpret it
as the birth of teachin
as the birth of teaching.
In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the
myths interpreted literally), his evidence is not
as convincing or
as extensive
as the evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.
The Cinderella
myth,
as Perrault
interpreted it, is at best anachronistic — we learn that beauty is a virtue but that grace is a gift... whatever that means.