Sentences with phrase «interpreted by standards»

November 12, 2017 - The nano - agents developed by the Singapore research team are capable of tracking down and locking onto diseased tissues in the body such as cancerous cells, sending back near - infrared signals which can be received and interpreted by a standard imaging...

November 9, 2017 - The research team from NTU Singapore tailored highly sensitive SPNs to track down and lock on to diseased tissues in the body such as cancerous cells, sending back near - infrared signals which can be received and interpreted by standard imaging...

REALTOR ® B said nothing about Ms. Q's remark, but after returning to his office filled out the paperwork necessary to file an ethics complaint against REALTOR ® P, charging her with violating Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13.

REALTOR ® A then filed a complaint against REALTOR ® B citing Article 16 of the Code of Ethics as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 16.

REALTOR ® A then filed a complaint with the local Board charging REALTOR ® B with violating Article 16 as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 16.

The Hearing Panel agreed with REALTOR ® A that she was the seller's exclusive representative and had not represented the buyer and concluded that her conduct had not violated Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13.

Somewhat reluctantly, he filed an ethics complaint alleging a violation of Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13.

A: Article 16 of the Code, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13, prohibits this kind of conduct.

The conclusion of the panel was that the consent of the listing broker required by Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13, can not be assumed, but must be expressed; and that REALTOR ® C had violated Article 16 by negotiating directly with REALTOR ® A's client without REALTOR ® A's consent.

The Hearing Panel concluded that REALTOR ® B had adequately respected the agency of REALTOR ® A as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 4.

In sum, Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13, obligates you to make reasonable efforts to find out if sellers have an existing exclusive listing before going forward.

If you had refused to present your offer unless the listing broker agreed to pay increased compensation, you most likely would have violated Article 16 as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 16.

A: The answer to your question lies in Article 3 of the Code as interpreted by Standard of Practice 3 - 1.

By trying to convince the buyers to work with him, the practitioner who owned the property violated Article 16 as interpreted by the Standard of Practice.

Several months after the sale, Seller X filed a complaint against REALTOR ® A alleging a violation of Article 1, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 1 - 7.

To ensure the smooth implementation of these new rules, a case interpretation explaining Article 12, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 12 - 10, was adopted by the committee in November and can be found in the Law and Policy section of REALTOR.org.

Not exact matches

You interpret the scriptures and believe that to be the standard by which everyone else is judged.

Sanneh observes that «people want to interpret Christianity by standards of exegesis and doctrine familiar to them, something that the Christendom model of the church warranted.

Unilateral openness means little in a world where trade is underpinned by the mutual recognition of standards which are constantly and collectively updated, interpreted and litigated.

The use of an «affirmative consent» standard, which requires passivity or the absence of the word «no» to be interpreted as a lack of consent to sexual activity, has been questioned by conservatives and libertarians both in New York and nationally.

«While the «gold standard» screening tool is the M - CHAT questionnaire, it must be read and completed by parents and then interpreted by a health care provider,» said lead author Carole A. Samango - Sprouse, EdD, and Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.

The C.S. Mott Children's Hospital Pediatric Radiology Department offers for children, from newborns to teens, standard CT studies as well as state - of - the - art high resolution and 3D CT angiography (to see inside the blood vessels), all supervised and interpreted by board - certified pediatric experts.

The board tries to clarify these standards by explaining, for instance, that «commitment» is interpreted as meaning that «accomplished mathematics teachers value and acknowledge the individuality and worth of each student, believe that all students can learn,» and so on.

Smarter Balanced interpreted the English Language Arts standards by distilling them into four major claims to measure and score.

Federal courts have played a key role in the development of special education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law means by a «free appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summer 2017).

State standards are interpreted differently by classroom teachers and can be a deterrent from taking the time to do «something else» like integrating technology.

Easy - to - interpret reports help educators identify trends in individual student's performance, isolate specific skills by Common Core National Standard that are mastered or need further development, and offer group - level data that help clarify when class - wide or school - wide intervention and support are needed.

In the system that we advocate, this process of identifying, interpreting, and scaffolding these learning standards takes three days and results in a Pre-K-12 set of end - of - year and within - year learning targets, aligned to agreed - upon standards, vertically articulated between grade levels, and understood by all teachers within the system.

McQueen says educators often interpret what the standards mean in concrete terms by seeing the kinds of questions that get posed to students in the standardized tests.

Our blog presents posts by C - SAIL researchers, Center partners, and guest colleagues to examine the impact of college - and career - readiness (CCR) standards on teaching and learning; interpret state and national policies affecting CCR standards implementation; and present resources for education practitioners, policymakers, and researchers.

In 2005, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) made all educational loans, public and private, nondischargeable absent a showing of undue hardship (an impossible standard to meet as interpreted by courts across the country).

The expected answer: dogs compete against each other to see who comes closest to the standard, as interpreted by the judge in the ring.

It is important that we remember that a breed standard is drawn up, and interpreted, by a particular group of human beings.

Indeed in some cases the breed standard is being interpreted so badly by the dog showing community, that the kennel club has allocated that breed to be «at risk» from conformational defects.

Thus, a product described by these terms is not held up to any standard higher than would be required for any other pet food on the market, and should not be interpreted as meaning the product is necessarily of higher quality or greater nutritional value.

For example, under the FDQA, as interpreted by the OMB guidelines, agency information disseminated to the public, such as the National Assessment, is subject to the following new quality standards:

The standards for copyright infringement are not set by academics but by legal statutes as interpreted by courts.

Although not explicitly saying so, one could infer from this paper that CEN / CENELEC, although preferring to stick to the system currently in place, would be more inclined to accept some kind of obligation to report regularly to the European Parliament than the continuous threat of technical standards being interpreted by a court of law.

29 That said, where a court of a Member State is called upon to review whether fundamental rights are complied with by a national provision or measure which, in a situation where action of the Member States is not entirely determined by European Union law, implements the latter for the purposes of Article 51 (1) of the Charter, national authorities and courts remain free to apply national standards of protection of fundamental rights, provided that the level of protection provided for by the Charter, as interpreted by the Court, and the primacy, unity and effectiveness of European Union law are not thereby compromised (see, in relation to the latter aspect, Case C - 399 / 11 Melloni [2013] ECR I - 0000, paragraph 60).

Both provisions foresee that the relevant instrument is not to be interpreted as to adversely affect fundamental rights standards already granted in other ways by the respective Member States.

Subsequently, many courts have interpreted Wyeth as affirmatively holding both that the burden in such a case is on the defendant to prove the FDA would have rejected the warning advocated by the plaintiff, and that the standard by which this must be shown is an «exacting» one beyond the normal preponderance - of - the - evidence standard.

Correctness is also usually the applicable standard (at para. 60) for interpreting a standard form contract (such as the CAPL operating agreement) and the same standard applies «by analogy» (at para 61) to terms such as «working interest» «which have a common meaning to participants in a given industry».

In the initial judicial review hearing Justice Rooke concluded the applicable standard to review the Board's decision was correctness on the basis that the Board's determination that it could increase assessed property value was a true question of jurisdiction — one of the established exceptions to the presumption of deference owed by a reviewing court to a statutory tribunal interpreting its home legislation (see Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centres Limited v Edmonton (City), 2013 ABQB 526 (CanLII) at paras 18 - 31).

2) apart from the fact that CJEU stated that even before EU exercising its power, the MS must still act - when they have the power to do so - in a matter which does not jeopardise or prejudice the EU, so that the mere «potential» competence does have an effect, limitating the MS action, the parallel is that a negative rule is still a rule, so that the existence of the rule makes the matter «regulated»: - as for the JHA, I must say that whilst I agree with you on the merits, I can see the issue raised by the CJEU, since it is quite the same raised by some national Constitutional Courts, i.e. that ECHR standards may be in conflict with national standards and formally speaking the ECHR is a treaty and therefore has a lower rank that national Constititions, and the decision of the ECHR on the interpretation of such standards within the context of the Convention does not bind the national Constitutional Court in interpreting the national Constitution standards: e.g..

In argument, however, the Crown conceded that the confusion created by this clumsy wording should be resolved by interpreting s. 487.012 (3)(a) as requiring that a reasonable belief standard be met notwithstanding the use of the word «suspected» towards the end of the provision.»

Comment: Many commenters argued that the proposed standard was unworkable as applied to «uses» by a covered entity's employees, because the proposal appeared not to allow providers to create general policy as to the types of records that particular employees may have access to but instead required that each decision be made «individually,» which providers interpret as «case - by - case.»

It is true that immediately thereafter the ECJ makes reference to Melloni, by clarifying that «in that respect, the national authorities and courts remain free to apply national standards of protection of fundamental rights, provided that the level of protection provided for by the Charter, as interpreted by the Court, and the primacy, unity and effectiveness of EU law are not thereby compromised».

Why would Justice Khullar hedge somewhat on the standard of review applicable to a decision by a Tenancy Dispute Officer, particularly in light of the precedent in Hetland and the presumption (at para 17) most recently articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Edmonton (City) v Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centres Ltd, 2016 SCC 47 (CanLII)(at paras 22 — 24) that the standard of review will be reasonableness where a statutory decision - maker applies and interprets its home statute?

The term «replacement cost» is not defined under the definitions of standard commercial property and homeowners insurance policies.1 Words not defined within the policy are interpreted by their ordinary, plain and usual meaning.

Determined correct specifications by interpreting data, alignment, functional operation and company standards