«This underscores the importance of
interpreting individual studies in the context of the wider literature.
Not exact matches
Given the impossibility of conceiving of the emergence of higher - level physical
individuals, the materialist version of physicalism
interprets this principle to mean that all causal efficacy must be exerted by the level of physical entities
studied by physics.
A 2016
study in Royal Society: Biology Letters confirmed what today's dog owners have told anyone who'll listen: Dogs can
interpret a human's emotional state based on the
individual's facial expression, a rare interspecies feat.
«We need to be much more cautious in
interpreting any single result,» he said, «and the world of science also needs to think about ways to improve the reliability of these
individual studies.»
Ecological
studies such as these need to be
interpreted alongside other
studies investigating the association between calorie intake (including from HFCS), weight and diabetes at an
individual level, so that the full picture of the relationships involved can be established.
The same
individual might be classified differently depending on how she compares with other parents in the
study, and on how she
interprets the wording of her questionnaire.
Despite the inclusion of national attachment, a comprehensive literature review that aimed to underscore the fundamental similarities between the attachment that
individuals form with their parents and their nation, and ample examples of parental imagery employed in nation conceptualisation, the
study failed to
interpret the results in terms of an attachment framework.
This interpretation is based on
studies with typically developing
individuals, showing that they tend to
interpret fear and sadness in others as aversive; thus, when an aggressive act is carried out and an expression of fear or sadness observed, this act is perceived to be aversive and it is inhibited, via classical conditioning (Blair et al., 2001; Ezpeleta et al., 2017b).
While the inertia parameter \ (\ phi \) in the AR (1) model has been
interpreted as a measure of a person's regulatory weakness, the experimental
study by Koval and Kuppens (2011) shows that it may not be appropriate to treat emotional inertia as a fixed trait of an
individual.