Correctness is also usually the applicable standard (at para. 60) for
interpreting a standard form contract (such as the CAPL operating agreement) and the same standard applies «by analogy» (at para 61) to terms such as «working interest» «which have a common meaning to participants in a given industry».
In three decisions, the Ontario Court of Appeal has held that a review of a decision
interpreting a standard form contract involves a question of law, not a question of mixed fact and law: MacDonald v. Chicago Title Insurance Company of Canada, 2015 ONCA 842; Monk v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company (Lindsay), 2015 ONCA 911; Daverne v. John Switzer Fuels, 2015, ONCA 919.