Sentences with phrase «interventionist god»

In contrast, the desert seems to breed fatalism, a belief in an interventionist god with its own capricious plans.

The interventionist God inevitably retreats before the advance of science.

The interventionist God is one such concept.

The problem is that the theology of a personal, interventionist God is widely and strongly taught.

In short, if yr unconvinced and remain emotionally empty about the reality of it, then maybe, give up the idea of an interventionist God and start elsewhere.

For many people today, the supernatural, interventionist God is dead.

Leuba called this an «interventionist God» and explained that he offered this definition because that is the God worshiped in every branch of the Christian religion.»

The 8 percent who did not almost certainly have a less interventionist God in mind.

If there is no interventionist God, in any directions, than its all focused on what we Do know, not what we struggle to make fit into the Real World — namely an Interventionist God who does so with a great deal of whimsy.

For many people, the supernatural, interventionist God is dead.

The answers can run the spectrum — from a personal interventionist God to a mysterious spirit, a creative force, or to the source of all that is.

Not exact matches

I'm not a deist and that model does fit and I think interventionist is poor theology and goes against the «Every event is a gift from God» model set by Augustine and echoed in the Reformation.

The second element in this older way of seeing God is an interventionist way of thinking about the relationship between God and the world.

Or to ask things of a God who doesn't go «zap», who isn't a specific interventionist?

Christianity wants persons to believe in a supernatural, interventionist, all - knowing judging God but through my experiences I have come to the same conclusion to which the embattled, controversial United Church of Canada minister Greta Vosper has come — God is not interventionist and supernatural:

I must repeat: the conviction that God does not work as a specific interventionist requires us to conclude that God does not respond in this way.

If our common sense can not conceive of God as an interventionist zapper then we certainly can not conceive of God as somehow zapping in and becoming a particular human being.

If God is in the processes, if God is the context, if God is not a specific interventionist.

It fits better with our common sense to adopt a view not unlike that found in parts of the Old Testament: sin will have its harmful consequences for the person doing as well as for the person done to, not as a result of a special interventionist act of God but as a natural result of the sin itself.

Surely, though, our tradition offers a much better image than that of God sitting in judgment on our earthly lives and then imposing a final destination as a separate interventionist act.

It also stands behind the understanding of an «interventionist» God who may upset the normal order by contravening what would otherwise naturally happen.

Christians often use your rationalisation as a convenient fall - back position when evidence that God is an all - powerful interventionist is painfully lacking.

From Bultmann categories in theology, which polemic needed only to be enlarged to include biblical - kerygmatic as well as objective - interventionist theological language about God to become very radical indeed.

Instead of preserving suspense through nihilism (in which God is either nonexistent or malign) or through Manichaenism (in which dark and light are equally matched and equally likely to prevail), the novelist gives us a God too powerful and too aloof to bother with anything so interventionist as the Incarnation.