Sentences with phrase «interview children at any age»

Not exact matches

Mr Steele found that the fathers» initial interviews, conducted during the pregnancy, were powerful predictors of the children's emotional and mental state at age 11, but not of their condition at younger ages.

Subjects for the interviews were breastfeeding mothers whose infants were evaluated by a pediatric resident at a well - child visit from birth to 1 month of age in the pediatric outpatient center.

As evidence, she pointed to a 2011 study in the United Kingdom which found that three - quarters of the 6,000 young adults ages 18 to 22 years interviewed about their experiences in sports earlier in adolescence reported at least 1 incident of emotional harm playing sports, one third of whom identified their coach as the main source of harm, and to a 2005 study - one which I cited in my 2006 book, Home Team Advantage (Harper Collins), and in articles adapted from that book for MomsTEAM.com - finding that 45 % of children reported verbal misconduct by coaches, including name - calling and insulting them during play.

In this study over 100,000 pregnant Danish women were interviewed at three separate occasions about their consumption of alcohol twice in pregnancy and again at age six month of their child.

A cohort of children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) were interviewed at elementary school age (8 and 10 years) about bullying experiences and then about parasomnias at secondary school age (12 - 13children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) were interviewed at elementary school age (8 and 10 years) about bullying experiences and then about parasomnias at secondary school age (12 - 13Children (ALSPAC) were interviewed at elementary school age (8 and 10 years) about bullying experiences and then about parasomnias at secondary school age (12 - 13 years).

Laura has written numerous articles for the Age of Autism blog, done radio, TV, and documentary interviews, spoken at rallies in CA to oppose tyrannical and unethical vaccine legislation, sponsored speakers and documentaries in her area, given informal talks, and more, all in the hopes of sparing other children and their families from the devastation that vaccines leave in their wake.

And we'll be inspired by a touching interview about one child's amazing love for his lost dogs and how at a young age has helped countless homeless animals.

Urine samples were taken during the last trimester of pregnancy to measure phthalate content, and the children were followed up with interviews and testing at ages 3, 5, and 7.

The American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Health Supervision III, which are meant to serve as «a framework to help clinicians focus on important issues at developmentally appropriate time intervals,» recommends that physicians interview children alone beginning at the age of twelve (or as early as the age of ten if it is comfortable for the child).

«If you're an executive in your mid-50s who made it through the first screenings because you didn't put your first couple of jobs on your resume or excluded the year you graduated, you could walk into that interview and be talking to an HR person who's the age of your child,» said Sally Haver, senior vice president of business development at The Ayers Group / Career Partners International, a recruiting company that specializes in career transitions and outplacement.

▶ The quality of the home environment for child development indexed by aspects of parental care giving, measured by observation and maternal interview in the home at child - age 12 and 24 months using the HOME Inventory.18

These included characteristics on multiple levels of the child's biopsychosocial context: (1) child factors: race / ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian / Pacific Islander / Alaska Native), age, gender, 9 - month Bayley Mental and Motor scores, birth weight (normal, moderately low, or very low), parent - rated child health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2) parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) score.

Most outcome data were collected by telephone interview of mothers at enrollment to the study (at 16 - 20 weeks» gestation), at 7 to 10 days post partum, when enrolled children were 3 months of age, and again when these children were at 30 months of age.

The caregiver interview at age 4 years recorded the child's sex, child's race / ethnicity (white, African American, or other), caregiver's marital status (married, never married, or formerly married), and family income.

The caregiver's overall assessment of the child's health and serious illness in the past year at the interview at age 6 years was used to assess the outcome variables.

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule demonstrates good interrater reliability (κ > 0.85) and validity in this cohort, as demonstrated by the disordered group who sought treatment frequently and had high levels of functional impairment.26 For both the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the reporting period was 12 months prior to the interview (eg, at age 11 years [hereafter, age - 11] interviews assessed depression while the child was age 1Interview Schedule demonstrates good interrater reliability (κ > 0.85) and validity in this cohort, as demonstrated by the disordered group who sought treatment frequently and had high levels of functional impairment.26 For both the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the reporting period was 12 months prior to the interview (eg, at age 11 years [hereafter, age - 11] interviews assessed depression while the child was age 1Interview Schedule for Children and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the reporting period was 12 months prior to the interview (eg, at age 11 years [hereafter, age - 11] interviews assessed depression while the child was age 1Interview Schedule, the reporting period was 12 months prior to the interview (eg, at age 11 years [hereafter, age - 11] interviews assessed depression while the child was age 1interview (eg, at age 11 years [hereafter, age - 11] interviews assessed depression while the child was age 10 years).

Children at Risk in the Child Welfare System: Collaborations to Promote School Readiness: Final Report (PDF - 1188 KB) Catherine E. Cutler Institute for Child and Family Policy & Oldham Innovative Research (2009) Provides an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well - being as well as a case study in Colorado involving interviews with key stakeholders and statewide surveys of caseworkers and foster parents to examine how collaborations between the child welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfareChildren at Risk in the Child Welfare System: Collaborations to Promote School Readiness: Final Report (PDF - 1188 KB) Catherine E. Cutler Institute for Child and Family Policy & Oldham Innovative Research (2009) Provides an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well - being as well as a case study in Colorado involving interviews with key stakeholders and statewide surveys of caseworkers and foster parents to examine how collaborations between the child welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfare syChild Welfare System: Collaborations to Promote School Readiness: Final Report (PDF - 1188 KB) Catherine E. Cutler Institute for Child and Family Policy & Oldham Innovative Research (2009) Provides an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well - being as well as a case study in Colorado involving interviews with key stakeholders and statewide surveys of caseworkers and foster parents to examine how collaborations between the child welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfare syChild and Family Policy & Oldham Innovative Research (2009) Provides an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well - being as well as a case study in Colorado involving interviews with key stakeholders and statewide surveys of caseworkers and foster parents to examine how collaborations between the child welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfare syChild and Adolescent Well - being as well as a case study in Colorado involving interviews with key stakeholders and statewide surveys of caseworkers and foster parents to examine how collaborations between the child welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfare sychild welfare, early intervention / preschool special education and early care and education services meet the developmental needs of children ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfarechildren ages 0 to 5 who are involved in the child welfare sychild welfare system.

The Foundation for Accountability screener identified children with special health care needs.24 The Child Behavior Checklist for children 1.5 to 5 years of age measured parents» perceptions of their child's behavioral problems with regard to emotional reactivity, being anxious or depressed, sleep, attention, and aggression.25 Parents rated their child regarding how true (often, sometimes, or never) each item was at the time of the interChild Behavior Checklist for children 1.5 to 5 years of age measured parents» perceptions of their child's behavioral problems with regard to emotional reactivity, being anxious or depressed, sleep, attention, and aggression.25 Parents rated their child regarding how true (often, sometimes, or never) each item was at the time of the interchild's behavioral problems with regard to emotional reactivity, being anxious or depressed, sleep, attention, and aggression.25 Parents rated their child regarding how true (often, sometimes, or never) each item was at the time of the interchild regarding how true (often, sometimes, or never) each item was at the time of the interview.

Baseline covariates included in regression models were site of enrollment (hospital or office), age of child at interview, and characteristics of the mother (age, education, race / ethnicity, employment), father (employment), family (marital status / father in household, number of siblings, owned home, income), and infant (low birth weight, source of payment for care).

The modifications and descriptive epidemiology of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children in this sample have been described by McGee et al. 24 At ages 18, 21, and 26 years, study members were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.25 Major depressive disorder was diagnosed according to DSM - III - R criteria at ages 18 and 21 years and DSM - IV criteria at age 26 yearAt ages 18, 21, and 26 years, study members were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.25 Major depressive disorder was diagnosed according to DSM - III - R criteria at ages 18 and 21 years and DSM - IV criteria at age 26 yearat ages 18 and 21 years and DSM - IV criteria at age 26 yearat age 26 years.

At ages 11, 13, and 15 years, study members were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.23 Major depressive disorder was diagnosed according to DSM - III criteria.

Each adoptive parent is interviewed at child age 7 — 9 years, completes a series of online questionnaires, and participates in three short phone interviews focused on child diet and activities over the prior 24 - hour period.

Mother's age at birth of first child, level of education, cigarette and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and postpartum depression were obtained during the interview when the child was 5 months of age.

Mothers were interviewed at home 4 times, when their child was 5, 17, 30, and 42 months of age.

Caregivers including foster carers, relative or kinship carers, residential care workers and adoptive parents of children and young people aged 9 months to 17 years will be invited to complete a face - to - face interview at 18 - month intervals during the study.

(Note that although having parents who are unmarried is a «current» predictor of a poor father - child relationship, there is no information collected at the GUS age 10 interview on the current quality of the partner relationship.

Partners were interviewed at home at sweep 2 (child aged 2), providing the main direct source of information from fathers (Bradshaw et al., 2008).

There is a significant association between mother's age and father - child relationship quality, in that children with younger mothers (under 40 years at the child aged 10 interview and therefore under 29 at the time of the child's birth) are more likely to have a poor father - child relationship (Figure 4 - A).

This paper is based on data from natural mothers interviewed at the time of the first sweep of GUS undertaken in 2005/2006 when their baby was aged 10 months old and subsequently re-interviewed annually on three further occasions, until their children were almost four years old.

Unfortunately, GUS has not collected information on children's relationships with non-resident fathers at the age 10 interview, although this is planned for the next round of data collection when children are in their first year of secondary school.

All other indicators of wellbeing were gathered from children themselves at the age 10 interview using an audio computer - assisted self - completion questionnaire.

Adolescents were assessed at intake, 3 -, 6 -, 9 -, and 12 - month follow - ups using the Kiddie - Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Age Children — Present and Lifetime Version (K - SADS - PL), Camberwell Family Interview and Coding System, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).

Caregivers in the intervention and control groups participated in interviews at baseline following the child's birth and at follow - up when the child was 1 to 3 years of age and then annually when the child was 7 to 9 years of age.

Screen time and snacking behaviour varied according to child's age at the sweep 5 interview.

A total of 622 children were assessed longitudinally at ages 3 and 5 with a semi-structured diagnostic interview and questionnaires filled out by parents and teachers.

Relations between symptoms of ADHD reported in the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment interview (PAPA), and EF as measured by the BRIEF - P (parent form), were investigated in a large, nonreferred sample of preschool children (37 — 47 months, n = 1134) recruited from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

The Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents for Parents of Preschool and Young Children (DICA - PPYC [38]-RRB- is a computerized semi-structured diagnostic interview for assessing the most common psychological disorders at ages 3 — 7 through algorithms, following the DSM - IV - TR criteInterview for Children and Adolescents for Parents of Preschool and Young Children (DICA - PPYC [38]-RRB- is a computerized semi-structured diagnostic interview for assessing the most common psychological disorders at ages 3 — 7 through algorithms, following the DSM - IV - TR criteinterview for assessing the most common psychological disorders at ages 3 — 7 through algorithms, following the DSM - IV - TR criteria [39].

The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS [45]-RRB- is a global measure of functional impairment filled out by the interviewer after the information has been obtained by parents in the diagnostic interview at ages 3 and 5.

This paper reports on the longitudinal links between first - time mothers (N = 48) Adult Attachment Interviews (AAIs), provided during pregnancy, and their first - born children's AAIs, provided at age 16 years.

Abstract: This paper reports on the longitudinal links between first - time mothers (N = 48) Adult Attachment Interviews (AAIs), provided during pregnancy, and their first - born children's AAIs, provided at age 16 years.

The longitudinal London Parent — Child Project (Fonagy et al., 1991) found that mothers with higher RF (who were interviewed during their first pregnancy) were more likely to have a child with a secure attachment model at the age of 1 Child Project (Fonagy et al., 1991) found that mothers with higher RF (who were interviewed during their first pregnancy) were more likely to have a child with a secure attachment model at the age of 1 child with a secure attachment model at the age of 1 year.