So how could they be coaxed
into accepting the evidence that refuted these dearly held beliefs?
Not exact matches
Even if you
accept Zuckerberg's proposition that Facebook is making the world «more open and connected» — rather than recognize the
evidence it's dividing us
into ever more insulated and polarized digital tribes — you still have to weigh that against the damage it has caused.
I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is
evidence for some is not
accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little
evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much
evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit
into their world view so whatever
evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»
Eventually all of the circumstantial pieces of
evidence (each of which could possibly have a natural cause) cross
into the world of statistical impossibility when taken together... unless intelligent design is
accepted as a solution.
There is no
evidence that the offer was
accepted, but the email containing the offer is one of tens of thousands of documents that have been turned over to special counsel Robert Mueller's team as part of the ongoing investigation
into what, if any, collusion with Russia took place during last year's presidential election.
By taking that elemental assurance at its face value, he was able to
accept a primary rule of modern philosophy — that the
evidence for an external world can be found only within occasions of experience — without being drawn
into solipsism.
Using his experience as a detective, Wallace showed the «Chain of Custody» of the
evidence which was recorded in the New Testament Gospels and how they went from the actual life of Jesus to the «courtroom» or the Council of Laodicea in 363 AD where the four Gospel accounts were officially
accepted into the New Testament canon.
I say this without sounding to mean (and I'm tryping this in a light manner so don't take it this way) but I could
accept spider - man
into my heart too and believe he is out there with the same amount of
evidence that people who follow god do.
This precision in fitting the explanation to the
evidence should be carried over
into philosophy: «The only explanation we should
accept as satisfactory is one which fits tightly to its object with no space between them, no crevice in which any other explanation might equally well be lodged; one which fits the object only and to which alone the object lends itself» (CM 11).
I dare not jump
into your copy and pasted list there from a less reliable source as I don't have the time, but I caution you, don't believe all the lack of
evidence you hear, it's there and it's well
accepted.
The emails do not appear to provide
evidence of illegal activity, but legal experts say Trump Jr. could run
into trouble if investigators find he aided a criminal action, such as hacking
into Democratic computer networks, or violated campaign - finance laws by
accepting gifts from foreign entities.
This study was designed to use readily available agents in an
accepted large - animal model of human heart attack with the goal of obtaining
evidence that this treatment is ready to be moved
into human clinical trials.»
In Terence Davies» screen adaptation of Rattigan's The Deep Blue Sea, Davies plunges us
into Hester's memories, nudging us to
accept her interpretation of events while providing the necessary
evidence to doubt her perspective.
However, there is no universally
accepted explanation of how the universe got
into such a special state... Present cosmological
evidence points to an inflationary beginning and an accelerated de Sitter end... This implies an initial holographic entropy of about 1010, which is extremely small by comparison with today's visible entropy.
These supporting arguments and
evidence take Andy Lacis» expressions — for the most part — from mere assertion or claim
into the realm of supported and generally
accepted knowledge, about which anyone might express the utmost degree of confidence, conventionally.
The hypothesis is «
accepted» OVER TIME
into the consensus paradigm when SUFFICIENT
evidence and SUFFICIENT testing have convinced all significant stakeholders that it is the only credible, non falsified solution to the question available AT THAT TIME.
I would be happy to
accept expert
evidence (opinion)
into the mix but shun the notion of an expert prior.
This is the way that science works (without the interference of politicians): some ideas are supported by empirical
evidence and are gradually
accepted by the scientific community, while others that lack empirical support are discarded
into the dustbin.
However, the General Court
accepted Gifi's argument that the Board failed to examine all the
evidence it had produced, and the Board's judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take
into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»
By
accepting the certificate of analysis
into evidence without first allowing defense voir dire / cross examination questioning of the machine operator
accepts that attestation clause as reliable without allowing the defendant not only to challenge not only whether the witness is reliable, credible and with sufficient recall, but also to challenge whether the witness properly and according to DFS procedure operated this claimed sophisticated piece of machinery that thusly requires a commensurate level of sophistication in understanding the machinery and using it.
Air Canada's «notice» complaint is difficult to reconcile with the fact that the agreed statement was
accepted into evidence and all parties were «given the opportunity» to assert its relevance.
In a 52 - page opinion, he found five distinct evidentiary issues one side must cross to prove whether electronic data should be admitted
into evidence at trial or
accepted as an exhibit (see «Grimm's Issues of ESI»).
[775] In summary, it would be open to a jury to reject the
evidence of the County Road witnesses who testified for the defence and to
accept the
evidence of the witnesses who testified for the Crown that the appellant and Lynne did not travel on the County Road north of the tractor trail, but must have turned down the tractor trail
into Lawson's Bush where Lynne met her death.
In a second ruling yesterday, the court unanimously
accepted the Crown's appeal of a decision by Justice Williams to sever the 26 counts of first degree murder
into six and twenty as well as errors of law in three rulings on
evidence and errors in the jury charge.
[28] Frequently courts take
into account factual considerations, such as the ability of a witness to see or hear what occurred, in determining whether
evidence is reliable and should be
accepted.
[203] I
accept her
evidence that she was maneuvered
into having no meaningful legal advice.
May said the National Energy Board [NEB] «refused to
accept» the findings of the Royal Society report «because it came too late in the process to be fair to Kinder Morgan, which didn't want it entered
into as
evidence.»
Unfortunately, judges couldn't
accept the photos as
evidence and these tenants were often backed
into subpar stipulations.
If the adjudicator agrees with you, the document will not be
accepted into evidence.
Unanimously
accepted the idea of an
Evidence Code, the provisions of which would be brought
into force all at the same time, but with a delay between enactment and coming
into force.
Whether a reluctant judge is being moved to make an unpopular decision or a witness being coaxed
into remembering what really happened or
accepting the implausibility of their
evidence, there is nothing to touch it.
Based on the
evidence given by Mr. Richer and that of his passenger Mr. Moran, the GPS
evidence, and the expert accident reconstruction
evidence that she
accepted, the trial judge found that: i) Mr. Richer was operating the bus at a rate of speed in excess of the posted speed limit ii) critically, Mr. Richer did not decelerate on his approach to the intersection; iii) the pre-impact speed of the bus exceeded 65.6 kilometres per hour after it entered the intersection; and iv) Mr. Richer was momentarily inattentive to the road ahead when he glanced left and then right,
into the side mirrors of the City bus.
199 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Wheeler — due process; failure to appear at hearing; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; deposits; proper business practices; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; broker improperly conducted business under name other than that on his licensed as
evidenced by signs indicating a different name; broker fails to provide agency disclosure form to buyer prior to entering
into agency relationship; broker failed to deliver duplicate original of instrument to client; broker commingled funds by depositing deposit check
into operating account; untrustworthiness demonstrated by failure to return deposit when offer not
accepted; failure to comply with DOS investigation; broker's license revoked