Sentences with phrase «into arguments like»

Don't worry: It's perfectly normal to get into arguments like these with your significant other every once in a while, says John Gottman, a psychologist at the University of Washington and founder of the Gottman Institute.

Don't worry: It's perfectly normal to get into arguments like these with your significant other every once in a while, John Gottman, a psychologist at the University of Washington and founder of the Gottman Institute, told Business Insider.

Not exact matches

The arguments for participating in such off - the - record briefings are fairly obvious, just as they were for technology titans like Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Apple CEO Tim Cook, who got roped into a tech summit with Trump at the Trump Tower last week.

«Even the very first day we got into — not an argument — but he's like, «Well what would you do in this case?»

Conversations about emotional issues like animal cruelty can quickly devolve into heated arguments.

But Mnuchin extends that argument about transparency into something more like a rap sheet: take Beijing's money, he warns, and risk being trapped in a debilitating cycle of debt — something that has led to asset - stripping by Chinese practitioners of what the National Defense Strategy calls «predatory economics.»

A bigger problem is that cynical pols like Romney (and Michelle Bachmann on this issue) end up feeding into this self - defeating narrative because it seems easier than making a real argument about health care or taxes or what have you.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

I love how anti-choice nuts like Chad attempt to bring late - term abortion into the argument as if it were relevant.

justpro86 The possible infinite quality of time is not something that can just be debated into solution as the Kalam argument would like to.

If you subscribe to the above, then I feel like if you're a non-theist, that you are responsible for at least an honest, humble pursuit into theism and their arguments.

Your arguments try to nullify all the good work done by the Ahmadi Prophet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to take the violent jihad out of Islam like a malignant cancer and transform it from a primitive, violent version into a modern and respectable religion.

Critics say Flew went senile and was bamboozled into lending his name to a book ghostwritten by an apologist, uncritically describing recent weak theistic arguments like the «fine tuning» argument.

Its kind of like getting into an argument with someone who believes in Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy... why are you wasting your time here?

Indeed, an argument could be made that at no time since the First Great Awakening have so many churches of disparate denominational, theological and stylistic approaches been so united in terms of their music: one can now walk into old - line Pentecostal churches, small - town evangelical congregations, mall - like suburban megachurches, and many a mainline Protestant sanctuary across the country on any given Sunday morning and hear the same hymns and choruses done in approximately the same musical styles, with similar settings and instrumentation.

[Dennett's] limited and superficial book reads like a caricature of a caricature - for if Richard Dawkins has trivialized Darwin's richness by adhering to the strictest form of adaptationist argument in a maximally reductionist mode, then Dennett, as Dawkins» publicist, manages to convert an already vitiated and improbable account into an even more simplistic and uncompromising doctrine.

Ironically, I am going to have get into the Greek to show this... As such, I almost feel like my whole argument will be self - defeating.

Odds are, there will be some people at your church will get into a social media argument about such a move by a team they probably don't like and would normally never pay attention to.

And also it would not be a weighty argument that Jesus does not, like other religious Jews, look in suspense and anxious longing into the uncertain future, but is convinced that even now the turning point of the times is at hand, and the powers of the imminent Kingdom can already be discerned.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

I'm an atheist, and I don't really care what others believe, as long as no one is trying to force me into their beliefs (and I don't mean things like putting Bible passages in courthouses, those arguments are just petty).

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

Kind of like getting into a serious and heated argument with someone that believes in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny... beyond illogical.

(listen... Get close to an invisible spirit creature no one can prove exists that I claim is the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this...

I've run into that same argument, and like you, I am quite convinced that Jesus had to learn just as we do.

It's like getting into a heated argument with friends over what your fortune cookie is saying about your life.

Second, I'd like to point you to a handful of books and studies that make compelling arguments for incorporating more vegan - centric meals into your life.

I remember watching WWF (before it was WWE) as a kid, Roddy Piper, Hitman Hart etc and you'd get the camera going backstage into a soap opera like drama, arguments between fighters, The Million Dollar Man stole an ambulance after a fight in a staged kidnap scene etc..................................

now everybody just talk Shiit about us and with us fans being the joke in every pub... sport bar even in every argument... on Thursday when we were a goal down against Koln two Chelsea fans who just walked into the bar where I was watching the game were like» look at them, see how pathetic they are.

The argument being then that we shouldn't be in this mess in January and players should have been brought into these positions in the summer and I don't mean the like for like replacements that came in Sanchez was the best bit of business we have done in an age

It's foolish to get into arguments over idiotic issues like the Pledge of Allegiance, the clothes I wear, the food I eat.

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

We opted not to have either of our boys circ'd and even had my mother (a nurse) try to guilt us into it with the «look like Daddy» argument, lol.

Instead, I recommend that you say things like, «What can I do differently so we won't get into an argument as soon as I walk in the door tonight?»

We all seem to like black and white arguments, or putting people into good and bad camps.

Living life like it's taken from a page out of A Streetcar Named Desire, and getting into loads of arguments, frequently fighting, or yelling in rage is not healthy for mom or baby.

The second observation is to recall how the advocacy of an overt smaller state argument by many in the Coalition would, quite apart from polarising British politics like nothing since» 83, risk seeing the Left falling once again into a framing trap that pushes the centre of gravity in political discourse even further to the right.

Seems like pricing advocates should start weaving some sort of Oil Savings argument into their pitch.

Corbyn successfully attracted people into the Labour party for his election, and there were more people who didn't vote at all than Conservative voters in 2015, so at a glance this seems like a powerful argument.

The logic of this argument is that the left should just crawl away and die, or (same difference) schmooze its way into the New Labour hierarchy, as Galloway would clearly like to do.

And so I would think that asking questions instead of making arguments might be a good way to do that, to sort of lea [d] people to a conclusion without them feeling like you inserted it into their or [are] trying to insert into their brain.

The desert Southwest; it is a lot of area and it sounds like a huge amount of area, but actually there is a map in the article that shows five or six — if you divide it up just for argument sake — into five or six massive installations, they would fit very nicely in few different parts of the desert Southwest, where of course the solar radiation is highest all year long.

Part of my argument admittedly focuses on highly personal values, such as my concern that collective online creations like Wikipedia have made the Web less expressive by absorbing the efforts of hordes of volunteer authors into an overly regularized scheme.

«I don't like the argument that we think the niches are taken,» he said, citing the success that many invasive species on Earth have had when pushing into previously occupied niches.

An argument can be made that wheat germ is processed, which means it's beneficial components could have oxidized into harmful compounds (like rancid fats), and also that when its processed, many beneficial components, like fiber, have been thrown away.

Although Levy does a great job integrating the special effects into the story in an unobtrusive and even seamless way, he remains unable to lend a film a discernible personality beyond what exists in the script, and at best «Real Steel» feels like a convincing argument that he's eminently capable of handling generic mainstream blockbusters.

Maybe we have really bland lives that never veer into the dramatic, but I can say when an argument gets heated in my house it is bigger than life at times, and I have never had any arguments worthy of theatrics like Dean has in that particular moment.

So for me, the argument scene between Stephen Strange and Christine Palmer, that fight scene in the apartment — even to this day, every time I watch the movie, it feels like, «How did I get this scene from this gritty little indie film into this Marvel movie?»

We'd be foolish not to give some sort of shout out to other terrific scenes throughout the year, like the hilarious funeral sequence in Li» l Quinquin, which had us doubled over from laughter; both the border crossing and night vision sequences in Sicario; the ending of Carol, which should get an emotional response out of even the coldest souls; the opening long take in Buzzard, a painfully funny experience much like Entertainment; the bonkers final act of Jauja; a scorching scene from The Fool where the town mayor lays into her corrupt staff; everything that happens at Mamie Claire's house in Mistress America; the intense argument between Gerard Depardieu and Jacqueline Bissett in Welcome to New York; the tightrope sequence in The Walk, and much, much more.

Then we come to a deleted scenes reel (9:47), which starts with flashy alternate opening titles and proceeds to include an extended Stephen and Lana argument, a teenaged Stephen breaking into his father's house, adult Stephen opening up to what sounds like a therapist but ends up being a kinky lover, getting whipped by another lady we can assume is a prostitute, and boxing in some kind of dreamlike bit.