Not exact matches
Prior to modifying a
custody order, the court will consider whether the parents agree to the modification and how well the
child is integrated
into the family.
[189] In making an
order for
custody or access, the court will not take
into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of the
child: s. 16 (9).
They include two legal - aid lawyers from Texas who will discuss their role in last year's Texas Supreme Court ruling
ordering the return of
children taken
into custody by state authorities in the raid on the Yearning for Zion Ranch.
Where a spouse exercises a right of access to, or has physical
custody of, a
child for not less than 40 per cent of the time over the course of a year, the amount of the
child support
order must be determined by taking
into account
[228] In making a
custody order under s. 16 (1) of the DA, the court shall not take
into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of a
child (s. 16 (9)-RRB-.
Additionally, in making a
custody order under s. 16 (1), the court shall give effect to the principle that a
child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the
child and, for that purpose, shall take
into consideration the willingness of the person for whom
custody is sought to facilitate such contact (s. 16 (10)-RRB-.
This leaves the door open to forcing a step - parent
into a
child custody case to hold that step - parent in contempt of court for his or her contribution to any violation of
child custody or parenting time
orders applicable to his or her spouse's
children.
In Cortina, the court upheld the trial judge's decision to award sole
custody of teenage
children to the father but varied the costs
order to take
into account the fact that a particular offer had expired three days before trial and thus was not in strict compliance with Rule 18 (14).
The refusal to accede to the Hague Convention or enter
into any bilateral arrangements concerning the return of abducted
children constitutes an extremely strong red flag that a country does not consider the abduction of
children from other countries to be a serious matter, that it does not comply with international norms concerning international
child abduction, and that it is most unlikely to follow a foreign court's
orders concerning either
custody or visitation.
(1.3) A
child shall be taken
into temporary
custody by a law enforcement officer without
order of the court when there are reasonable grounds to believe the
child has run away from the
child's parents, guardian, or legal custodian and the
child's parents, guardian, or legal custodian has made a report to a law enforcement agency that the
child has run away from home.
-- Enabling parenting coordination by agreement or court
order; — Amending the Commercial Arbitration Act to address family arbitrations; — integrating reproductive technologies
into determining a
child's legal parents; — Replacing the terms «
custody» and «access» with «guardianship» and «parenting time»; — Defining «guardianship» through a list of «parental responsibilities» that can be allocated to allow for more customized parenting arrangements; — Extending the legislative property division regime to common - law spouses who have lived together for two years in a marriage - like relationship or who are in marriage - like relationship of some permanence and have
children together; — Excluding certain types of property (e.g. pre-relationship property, gifts, and inheritances) from the pool of family property to be divided 50 - 50; and — Providing that debts are subject to equal division.
If there is no
child custody order in place, then you run
into a bit of a dilemma.
In empathizing with their clients, professionals sometimes unwittingly get drawn
into advocacy roles, supporting what they believe to be their clients» best interests — winning
custody of the
children, keeping the house, securing restraining
orders, avoiding nasty alimony judgments — without stepping back to look at how their interventions, or lack thereof, affect the divorcing client and family.
Wallerstein:
Children who have been forced into court - ordered custody and visitation have grown up very angry and resentful of the parent who forced these decisions... Sadly for all children involved in this study, court - ordered visiting failed in its very important purpose in bringing father and children together in a renewed loving relat
Children who have been forced
into court -
ordered custody and visitation have grown up very angry and resentful of the parent who forced these decisions... Sadly for all
children involved in this study, court - ordered visiting failed in its very important purpose in bringing father and children together in a renewed loving relat
children involved in this study, court -
ordered visiting failed in its very important purpose in bringing father and
children together in a renewed loving relat
children together in a renewed loving relationship.
The court may
order an investigation
into abuse or neglect of a
child in a
custody battle.
Should the court deem it necessary, a temporary
order of
custody may be made, giving the
child to an aunt, uncle, sibling, or other family member during the investigation
into custody.
Many married couples enter
into a Separation Contract, a Separation Agreement and Property Settlement (SAPS), or obtain a Court
Order that details rights and obligations regarding
child support,
child custody, spousal support, and division of property and debt.
In
order to create or maintain stability for
children during divorce, it may be necessary to enter
into a temporary
custody arrangement while the divorce is pending.
In making an
order under this section, the court shall give effect to the principle that a
child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the
child and, for that purpose, shall take
into consideration the willingness of the person for whom
custody is sought to facilitate such contact.
On January 14, a new law went
into effect in Illinois that allows judges to
order a «right of first refusal» for parents who share joint
custody of their
children.
The courts must wait until at least 90 days after a deployment ends before entering final
custody orders in a case or making changes to any
child custody and parenting time
orders that existed when the parent was called
into active duty.
Prior to modifying a
custody order, the court will consider whether the parents agree to the modification and how well the
child is integrated
into the family.
The focus of the mandate of the Special Joint Committee on
Child Custody and Access, as set out in the
order of reference adopted by the Senate and the House of Commons, may, in fact, be too narrow, and does not take
into consideration the variety of family formations in Canada, which include families with parents with disabilities, same sex couples, aboriginal peoples and peoples from different cultures.
In practice, it frequently devolves post-
order and over time
into a time - share arrangement that differs little from traditional sole
custody with visitation (but differs a lot in the amount of the
child support
order.)