Sentences with phrase «into human thinking»

A logical fallacy is not necessarily a Bayesian fallacy [3], so given a particular circumstance, jumping to the conclusion will be more likely than not, and get baked into human thinking as a heuristic [4].

Nonetheless their distrust of universals went a long way toward undercuttingthe analogy which instils confidence into human thought and supplies the presupposition for biblical revelation.

Recent decades have expanded our understanding of the many non-rational factors that enter into human thought.

That if you could really understand why the verb «fill» differs from the verb «pour,» and both of them differ from the verb «load,» you'd penetrate deeply into human thought patterns.

Not exact matches

And in the future, journeys into space or the merging of humans with machines might change what we think of as ideal.

Kurzweil has appeared in Inc. magazine numerous times (he let us scan his brain and told us how to predict the future) and is the leading advocate of a school of thought called the singularity, which says, essentially, that humans will eventually turn into robots and live forever.

«Their basic thought is robotics and A.I. are going to weave their way into more and more skills that used to be human skills,» says Lee Rainie, Pew's director of internet, science, and technology research.

While you shouldn't try and trick your audience into thinking they're talking with a human, your chatbot can add a level of personality to your brand, resulting in a higher level of engagement from your audience.

These three brands have tapped into something deeper in all of us with their spot - on video advertising campaigns that, respectively, inspire our love of nature and adventure, our need for human connection and the desire for creative thought and expression.

Not only does this suggest modern humans might have been stepping tentatively into Europe and getting friendly with Neanderthals long before the wave of migration that led to today's population, it shows Neanderthals were more diverse than we thought.

Falling into the trap of thinking your invincible is «human nature,» Hadnagy says.

Referring to Chinese spokespeople, he added: «They have been clear about their intent to glorify their head of state by inserting his thoughts into the international human rights lexicon.»

But I also think there is a downward spiral that starts with turning any human being into an object.

I think, if you look into it, you will realize that «supernatural» is just a human concept to compartmentalize aspects of the natural world that we do not yet understand.

He is reading St. Augustine in the light of his own phenomenology when he speaks of God entering into the human heart unbidden and awakening its deepest aspirations long before we have had any thought about God.

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

Welcome to bible land, where love, sin, heaven, hell, the past, the future, all fall into this obscure, foggy area that is entirely influenced by human emotion, tradition, guesswork, and wishful thinking.

It is as if Benedict is bringing back into play the long - neglected lessons of St. Augustine to Catholic Social Thought — re-presenting, as it were, The City of God — that is, the City of that caritas which the Divine Persons gratuitously pour into the human heart, that it might cast the burning desire for human unity into the kindling of hundreds of millions of parched hearts.

Do you really think human life was just created by a puddle of goo that all of the sudden turned into a thinking / feeling person.

It's extremely humbling to think about God using us to give birth, adopt or foster other human beings, while also helping form them into adults.

Dalahast, I'm not trying to get into epistemology, but I do think that human perceptions are fallible and memory is one of those perceptions.

«Every human being however has a longing to know both the how and the why and if we begin to think that we can take one without the other we are denying ourselves some extraordinary insights into the Created Order in which we live.»

Not to put common human thought into God or Gods, can you imagine if all the houses of worship were the same?

Would that point to a mode of thinking which does not (for example) take feminist notions and human fatherly failures (or seeming successes) and press them back into the doctrine of God?

As long as it was assumed that the world that originally came into being was much like our present world, with human beings coming into existence abruptly in their present form, it was hard to think of origins in terms of chance and necessity.

No, when I think about God being redeemed, I am referring specifically to how we humans have tried to use Scripture, theology, and tradition to tie God down into a box.

Given a really deep insight into the concept of collectivity, we are bound, I think, to understand the term without any attenuation of meaning, and certainly as no mere metaphor, when we apply it to the sum of all human beings.

Let us think instead about how a moment of human experience comes into being.

For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.

He will not require not merely that the new knowledge be used as the foundation of the proof, but that the very spirit and atmosphere of the new knowledge enter in such a way into thedemonstration of God's existence, that the complexities and confusions of human thought engendered by the new knowledge shall be resolved in harmonious unity in the postulate of God's existence, nature, and relation to created being.

His celebrated saying that existence precedes essence, once it is translated into classical terms, means only that non-being precedes the essences formally constructed by human thought.

Did he mean to suggest that persons are responsible for bringing as much of the rest of nature as possible into conformity with this standard or was he thinking of a natural process apart from human effort?

here is a question for you to ponder; if god is so powerful that he thought the universe into exsistance, why does he need to cause natural events just to deal with a few medelsome humans; why not just blink those he doesn't like out of exsistance?

However, such an approach does not adequately take into account human wisdom: although one may argue that an individual of superior wisdom may engender respect and thus attain reproductive success, says Deane - Drummond, the fact that many of those who were thought to have wisdom were celibate makes this explanation unlikely.

In doing this there is nowhere for these lost lives to incarnate stopping the cycle of karma thus halting the human races push towards enlightenment into the next dimensions of thought thus ending your time line.

Makes me think of the Rat Race movie where that guy is transporting a live human heart for a transplant and it accidentally gets tossed into some weeds and a dog finally ends up chewing on it... That has got to be the funniest comedy movie of all time!

They have fought advances of thought, they have tried to defeat the efforts of men and women to know more about the world, they have denied the validity of scientific truth, they have called into question the freedom and responsibility, as well as the dignity, of human life.

These are the understanding of human beings and of nature that are now built into the whole structure of the dominant economic thinking.

Now, when we see an illusion we know that there is a human - made solution and, while we may applaud the showmanship of the magician, we are never fooled into thinking that only one person has the power to do it.

I think that our preoccupation with the divine side of the Bible has resulted in our neglecting the human side of it and misled us into thinking that we have already grasped (and appropriated in our evangelical traditions) the revelational freight which it delivers.

It's not the idea of a God that is the source of evil but it is us, as humans that pervert a thought, an idea, a philosophy or whatever you want to label it, into an ever oppressive pall over the planet.

They deem the talk of God's judgment irreverent, but think nothing of entrusting judgment into human hands... And so violence thrives, secretly nourished by belief in a God who refuses to wield the sword.

The fact that many of the assumptions fundamental to Whitehead's starting point in human experience were thrown into question by those undertaking this revolution is the main reason, I think, for the subsequent neglect of his philosophy in the English - speaking world.

We say we know the difference between questionable human life and undeniable human life, while it is evident to all but the willfully blind that lives once thought to be undeniably human are now thrown into question.

This is the phenomenology, particularly as practiced by Max Scheler, of which Wojtyla became a student, and which would in time lead him into novel, but orthodox, expositions of sexual ethics (Love and Responsibility), and into even more novel, though no less orthodox, expositions of the human person as the self - possessed locus of action and thought (The Acting Person).

If you look at the complexity of the universe and everything in it, to think it happened by accident from some chemicals mixing together and eventually mutating into humans and other animals is way more difficult to believe in than god.

I won't go into details here, but I will tell you that it has to do with a rejection of inerrancy, a synthesis of diverse theological thought and literature, and considerations of context, history and human nature.

Humans have been peeking into the darkness and inventing what they think is there for thousands of years, this does not prove there really is something there.

But with insight into retrospective aetiology based on the present situation, much could be cleared up in the vivid representation of the inferred state of man which causes difficulties in view of the way we inevitably think today about human origins.

God's receiving the world's achievements into his own everlasting life; God's remembering for ever that which is thus received; God's using for further good the achievements which have taken place in the created order — here are points which need to be emphasized when we begin to think of the worth or value of human existence.