«A Proposal to Integrate Price Mechanisms
into International Climate Negotiations,» Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol.
Richard was an organizer and signatory of the 2007 Bali Climate Declaration by Scientists, an effort by climate scientists to inject quantitative scientific substance
into international climate negotiations.
Not exact matches
When Boston - based Oxfam America began addressing
climate issues, «they had no one with
climate change or policy experience, and found me,» recalls Coleman, who was eager to move
into international negotiations.
He can lead
climate policy development by using existing authority and can ensure that the U.S. has a strong position going
into the next round of
international climate negotiations.
Events like LACCF are important venues not just for inspiring greater
climate action but at which to express views that can make their way
into international negotiations.
Bottom Line: CDR can play an important and beneficial role in
international climate negotiations, and it would be great to see negotiators start to incorporate CDR
into the dialogues in Lima and beyond.
Still, it was a key component of his acceptance piece, and whether or not the US throws itself
into international climate change
negotiations with renewed vigour, or contemplates a domestic carbon price, his success is certainly good news for the clean energy industry.
Hansen, noted for his outspokenness on the topic of
climate change and his willingness to venture
into an advocacy role that many other
climate scientists try to avoid, has previously voiced his concern about the 2 - degree warming benchmark, saying in 2011 at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) that, «the target that has been talked about in
international negotiations for 2 degrees of warming is actually a prescription for long - term disaster.»
Scientists can predict regional
climate - change risks much more reliably than they could 20 years ago, for instance, and those predictions are being incorporated
into the
international scientific assessments that inform United Nations
climate - change
negotiations.
The United States is not only responsible for the current crisis because, as President Obama noted, it is the second highest emitter of ghg in the world behind China, it has historically emitted much more ghgs
into the atmosphere than any other country including China, it is currently near the top of all nations in per capita ghg emissions, and the US has been responsible more than any other developed nation for the failure of the
international community to adopt meaningful ghg emissions reduction targets from the beginning of
international climate negotiations in 1990 until the Obama administration.
The US was once again reluctant to join this effort for a new
climate treaty [check out this video], but finally it gave
into the
international pressure during the last hours of
negotiations.
Incorporating such considerations
into international negotiations on
climate change is not fanciful or unrealistic.
For this reason C&C holds the best chance of being accepted by the
international community compared to other equity frameworks provided other issues that raise legitimate equity concerns including historical emissions levels are taken
into account in some way in
climate negotiations.
Sébastien Duyck, Senior Attorney, Center for
International Environmental Law (CIEL), said: Unabated by the political posturing of the US government, the
climate negotiations continued to progress in Bonn towards the development of practical guidelines to assist governments in translating the Paris Agreement
into concrete action.
In announcing the State Department's decision to reject the permit application for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, President Obama focused on how this decision fits
into the broader context of
international negotiations on
climate change.