«I was struck by enormous similarities with the investigation
into the leaked emails from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in November 2009 — the so called Climategate scandal.»
Not exact matches
The
leaked email comes amid a months - long investigation
into Uber's workplace culture.
Leaked emails about links between President Zuma's family and the Guptas have resulted in an investigation
into possible political influence.
The
leaked emails show Jones and colleagues feared that releasing information would draw them deeper
into disputes with amateur scientists, who would use it to create new controversies and cut
into their research time.
News organizations» abilities to build trust with sources and gather sensitive information have been called
into question by recent disclosures about surveillance: the U.S. Department of Justice's admission that it secretly obtained phone records from the Associated Press, Microsoft's admission that it read a blogger's personal Hotmail account to find a source of an internal
leak and criminal investigations that have used
email traces to identify and prosecute anonymous sources.
That all changed for me in November 2009, following the
leaked Climategate
emails, that illustrated the sausage making and even bullying that went
into building the consensus.
Although the letter to David Willetts was written following the general election, the DECC's response only arrived shortly after publication of the Muir Russell Report, the third report
into the
leaked documents and
emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU):
I've noticed that some of the disinformation being spread about the CRU hack (called Swifthack or Climategate — lots of info here) is starting to creep
into reports on climate change on the ABC, for example this morning some radio reports regarding the WMO's finding that the last decade has been the hottest on record has been qualified by mentions of the hack, when there is no credible reason to believe that the
leaked emails indicate a problem with the instrumental record — I note that the online version of the story doesn't do this though).
The EPA cited a 2007 Supreme Court ruling declaring that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, but the science upon which that ruling was based has now been called
into question when
emails and internal documents between the UNâ $ ™ s leading climate change scientists were
leaked to the public.
The senders and recipients of the
leaked CRU
emails constitute a cast list of the IPCC's scientific elite, including not just the «Hockey Team», such as Dr Mann himself, Dr Jones and his CRU colleague Keith Briffa, but Ben Santer, responsible for a highly controversial rewriting of key passages in the IPCC's 1995 report; Kevin Trenberth, who similarly controversially pushed the IPCC
into scaremongering over hurricane activity; and Gavin Schmidt, right - hand man to Al Gore's ally Dr James Hansen, whose own GISS record of surface temperature data is second in importance only to that of the CRU itself.
This week saw the publication of the third and final report
into what will forever be known as «climategate», the publication of
leaked (or stolen)
emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit.
Former civil servant Muir Russell will head an independent inquiry
into the professional behaviour of climate scientists at University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich, UK, relating to the
emails which were
leaked into the public domain last November
«An independent review
into the «Climategate»
leaked email scandal at the University of East Anglia is due to begin today.»
The lawsuit alleged that Lane's one - time co-anchor hacked
into her
email account and
leaked private information.
In her lawsuit, Lane alleges that her former co-host hacked
into her
email account,
leaking private information.
The records, including a
leaked email and an internal government memo from January 2016, provide a glimpse
into public servants» deliberations over opposition to the multi-billion-dollar Kinder Morgan project as well as the power and influence of the oilpatch over Canadian government policies.