Indeed, trying to turn a religious belief
into a philosophical argument is a problem that has vexed the faithful since Thomas Aquinas.
Not exact matches
Craig validly schematizes the basic
philosophical argument to be discussed as follows (translation
into strict categorical and syllogistic form produces a valid EAE, figure 1 syllogism, K 103):
But if
philosophical inquiry thus discovers contingent aspects in God's full actuality, it also discovers the intrinsic limits of its own inquiry
into the mystery of God, for no amount of ingenious
argument can deduce the concrete, historical character of that which happens to be, but which could have been otherwise.
«Unsecularizing the academy» and getting the scholarly elite to accept the
philosophical viability of religious reason as an equal player in intellectual
argument is not the first step towards God's reentrance
into the consciousness of modern society.
They were also efforts to translate
into law certain
philosophical arguments and political commitments regarding the nature and meaning of citizenship, democracy, freedom, and education.
The threat of natural selection is largely
philosophical: It calls Biblical literalism
into doubt and undermines the
argument that humans are somehow distinct from the rest of the animal kingdom.
And yes, you can make the «well, government enabled it» standard
argument and say the the solution is to sprinkle magic Libertarian pixie dust and make everyone
into Randian supermen, but in the real world where we have billions of people who need to coexist in a functioning society with legacy social structures we need solutions that work, not
philosophical wankery.