The watering down of the snooping proposals came as a result of Tory and Liberal Democrat backbench pressures, but many Lib Dem MPs were keen to get stuck
into a public argument over civil liberties.
What appeared to be a spat between Labour and Unite over vote - rigging has turned
into a public argument over party funding and a redefinition of the relationship with the unions.
Stanley Hauerwas (in addition to providing a witty characterization» for those who knew him» of the late Paul Ramsey) argues that Ramsey's attempt to enter
into public argument in bioethics compromised his religious convictions.
An example of translating that belief
into a public argument is «Observing the Sabbath is important enough to people of faith to outweigh the objections of some unbelievers.»
Not exact matches
Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, presented a more hopeful view of the case to Capital, and suggested that the Florida jury would be moved by their
argument that Hogan had turned his own sex life
into a
public spectacle long before Gawker published this tape.
That formally correct fact won't matter much, so long as Farrow does not adequately trouble himself to translate his particular religious
arguments into general
public arguments.
In an
argument which was becoming
public, he was being offered a virtually magical doctrine, a sort of droit de papaute extending autocratically
into life after death, and all of it backed with the threat of
public violence, the violence of death by fire.
Various parts or implications of this position are also finding their way
into a variety of pastor - oriented journals, as can be seen in Cobb's
arguments against free trade in Theology and
Public Policy, [5] his exchanges with Dennis P. McCann in The Christian Century over NAFTA, [6] and his debates with Robin Klay in Perspectives over GATT.
Yet many supposedly intelligent and reasonable people acted as though they were entering
into a real debate on breastfeeding in
public spaces, as though it were possible a valid
argument might exist against a child's right to be fed.
To support his
argument, Tough describes how the private Riverdale Country School and KIPP
Public Charter School — two New York schools at opposite ends of the socioeconomic spectrum — developed this new approach to character development and are now integrating
into their school cultures.
While their motives may be noble, however, the foraying of scientists
into more polemic debate has served only to add to the confusion of how the «
argument from authority» should be received in the
public sphere.
On the other hand, the fact that the case is already so far in the
public domain might be evidence that
arguments used by m» learned friends to try and stuff it back
into the obscurity from which it sprang are little more than legal tosh and nonsense.
These stories only serve to strengthen the
argument that Britain is sacrificing its sovereignity through further engagement in Europe; more clear and easily accessible information on financial arrangements and, if lacking in transparency, reformation of these institutions could shake Britain out of its comfort zone and force us
into serious
public consideration of the Euro.
During the session, Miliband tried to satisfy Cameron's
argument that the
public needed a «swift» inquiry
into the Libor scandal by suggesting a twin approach.
He must now fashion this
into an effective
public argument.
But Perez must now join with Schumer and Pelosi as part cheerleader, part fundraiser, part organizer and recruiter, part
public messenger, helping frame the party's
arguments and identity, while charting a strategy to turn energy
into votes in upcoming elections.
«There is,» he continues, «a powerful
argument for the UK getting on with cutting
public spending more aggressively, now, in order to avoid the risk of being forced
into far harsher spending cuts later.»
He must translate policy ideas
into the language of
public arguments and election posters.
I'm going to sound all Henry Porter here, but it's not going to be long before we're all of us fair game on the basis that... well, you can find any excuse really to pry
into someone's life under the
arguments of «
public interest» or «freedom of speech», and the principle extends further than the lives of celebrities right down to us at the bottom.
This
argument was repeated by a lot of the supporters of the pay raise, and it is basically the same
argument that is used for
public financing of campaigns: to increase the field of candidates and bring more political outsiders
into the mix.
A day after one of his aides got
into a heated
argument with a TV reporter over his refusal to take questions on homelessness, de Blasio insisted his administration had an open door policy with both the press and the
public.
The Tories have been so successful at transforming a crisis of market failure
into a crisis of
public spending because they have stuck to a script: they've repeated the same
arguments whenever a microphone has been pushed in their direction.
10) In the middle of a heated
argument with your spouse, abruptly sit down (preferably on the ground, especially if you're in
public), cross your legs
into lotus pose, close your eyes and stop responding.
As she begins to reconnect with her family — especially with daughter Julie (Mamie Gummer), whose current post-breakup rough patch helps bring Ricki back
into her life — the character's mask gradually drifts away, and Streep allows moments of poignant authenticity to peak through: in an anguished phone call to current boyfriend / fellow guitarist Greg (Rick Springfield), in a private crying jag after an annihilating
argument with Maureen, in a meltdown during a live performance in which Ricki exposes her regret and self - loathing to the
public.
Students can take persuasive essays and create
public service announcements, combining videos they've created with Tellagami or ChatterPix
into a short clip that supports the
argument outlined in their writing.
In this blog post by Tamara Bashore - Berg, we dive
into the startling reality of Michigan's literacy crisis and explore Dr. Nell Duke's
argument that this issue is, at its heart, a
public health crisis.
That there are more Latino children in
public schools now than at the time George W. Bush signed No Child
into law, and yet, are improving academically proves the too - many - immigrant - and - minority children
argument to be pure sophistry.
Really shiny things that don't mean anything,
Public Commission, Trybuna Honorowa, Plac Defilad, Muzeum Sztuki Nowoczesnej w Warszawie, Warsaw, PL Ryan Gander, Billboard for Edinburgh: Year 4, Ingleby Gallery, Edinburgh, UK Icarus Falling - An Exhibition Lost, Maison Hermès, Le Forum, Tokyo, JP Meaning... surrounds me now, 1223 Gendaikaiga, Tokyo, JP New Collisions in Culturefield, Johnen Galerie, Berlin, DE Locked Room Scenario, Artangel, London UK Now there's not enough of it to go around, Annet Gelink Gallery, Amsterdam, NL You have my word, Dazaifu Tenmangu, Fukuoka, JP Attempting to remain light on ones feet: Work from Daiwa Collection, Okinawa Prefectural Museum, Okinawa, JP Ftt, Ft, Ftt, Ftt, Ffttt, Ftt, or somewhere between a modern representation of how a contemporary gesture came
into being, an illustration of the physicality of an
argument between Theo and Piet regarding the dynamic aspect of the diagonal line and attempting to produce a chroma - key set for a hundred cinematic scenes, Taro Nasu Gallery, Tokyo, JP
Economists have an
argument that things further
into the future should be discounted, and while this may be useful in managing private investments it is not obviously sound as a strategy for
public policy.
Arguments made — and entered
into the
public discourse — about the effects of AGW and our response to them should be seen as affecting all of us, not just as an
argument by special interest or about «thing».
Clearly the important thing is to inform the wider
public who may be exposed to the politically - motivated
arguments of the denial lobby and misled
into thinking their
arguments are driven by science rather than ideology.
«The reason «consensus» has not appeared to work in society at large to date isn't because it's ineffective — it's because there is a well - funded countermovement out there that takes every opportunity to mislead the
public into thinking that there isn't a consensus,» Lewandowsky told me, in response to this
argument.
And through conversations with others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all kinds of ways that climate change could become a catalyzing force for positive change — how it could be the best
argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving of local economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest in starving
public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back ownership of essential services like energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system
into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all of which would help to end grotesque levels of inequality within our nations and between them.
In regards the
public interest test that we have to address, once again, I would think that whilst there is a good
argument for protecting the ability of academics to communicate freely and openly, the underlying data that may comprise part of that communication might well fall
into another category.
You can not talk credibly about lowering emissions globally if, for example, you are slow to acknowledge climate change; if you undermine calls for an effective carbon price; and if you always descend
into the «jobs versus environment»
argument in the
public debate.
Bart your stated
argument was that putting fossil mining rights
into common ownership would benefit the
public.
Then they analyzed and explained how mainstream media stood by — or in some cases colluded — while deniers turned a clear issue of science (and an issue for
public safety)
into a partisan
argument that no one could win.
In this environment, any
argument that puts risk
into statistical perspective — or criticises the alarm generated by sensational copy, anti-nuclear activists and interventions from
public - health bureaucracies — looks like advocacy.
You say of Lindzen and Christy; «It is a sure sign that one side has lost the
argument in the scientific journals when they instead try to move the scientific debate out
into the
public sphere where they can more easily bamboozle people with their pseudoscientific
arguments.»
It is a sure sign that one side has lost the
argument in the scientific journals when they instead try to move the scientific debate out
into the
public sphere where they can more easily bamboozle people with their pseudoscientific
arguments.
In this situation, someone starts a «
public» debate over the Polar Vortex, and then this gets mimicked
into multiple lines of thought and ensuijg
arguments related back to climate change.
It is not my ability to understand the underlying science, concepts or
arguments that I call
into question with these remarks but merely a recognition on my part that I rely heavily on others to honestly represent the science that these papers contain in the more
public - friendly manner that I require to fully comprehend them and their significance.
If we try to attack at the policy level, we will be mired in
argument which rests on opinion, and this plays
into the hands of bureaucrats who have vested interest in disconnecting the
public from the debate.
Protection of the
public devolves
into an
argument about the sufficiency of scientific evidence.
I am skeptical of Roger's assertion that the
public's willingness to pay for GHG mitigation is immutable, but I need evidence rather than my gut feelings if I'm going to turn my skepticism
into an actual
argument that Roger is wrong.
There are roughly fifty seats in the Supreme Court's gallery are available to the
public, on a first - come, first - served basis, a small number compared to the 137,000 people who tuned
into the audio live stream of the Ninth Circuit oral
arguments.
This post notes that the other
argument could «throw a monkey wrench»
into the
public - domain
argument about this post.
ST. JOHN»S — Recently, a video of a Florida judge and a
public defender getting
into a heated
argument before leaving a courtroom for an apparent fistfight made the rounds on the Internet.
REVERSES
INTO spam blog («splog») comment spam very
public arguments and embarrassments libel and slander disorganized lists time consumer
That's not the case here because the related legal
argument is not the kind of stuff that gets the general
public interested — even I'm not going to go
into detail on the case law for now.