Sentences with phrase «into question why»

The move is the first time one of Alphabet's so - called Other Bets should no longer stand alone, and calls into question why it was run as a separate business in the first place.

I pointed out heat transport can affect the energy balance and I called into question why so much heat was added to the oceans in such a short period of time.

With «Total War: Warhammer II» cracked in less than 24 hours, it calls into question why publishers would continue to use Denuvo.

[1] Given the long - term underperformance, it calls into question why active funds charge such high fees relative to their passive fund counterparts.

Which calls into question why make general purpose tablets at all.

Similarly, the V6 engine offers effortless surge despite a 1975 kg kerb weight, bringing into question why you'd opt for higher - powered variants for any reason other than status.

Flagg also called into question why there will be 50 beds to start in the facility.

We can not of course go more closely here into the question why the Church has the right and duty, not only to promulgate and inculcate the precepts of immutable divine law and to supervise its observance, but on its own initiative to go beyond this and lay down positive legal prescriptions, and impose obedience to them as a Christian's duty, although they are enacted with full consciousness that they are not necessarily eternally valid but can be changed and even abolished.

Not exact matches

Ask questions to gain insight into whether these individuals understand your business model and why they want to work for you.

But before we can delve into Riggle's advice on how to be more awesome, it's important to answer one glaring question: why does this academic talk like a teenage skater?

You're not going to get the answers you need if it seems like you might be looking into downsizing or restructuring, so be explicit about why you're asking these questions and how honest answers will help your employees get the solutions they need.

There's no plan afoot to carve four venture capitalists into a mountain anytime soon (though it's not inconceivable given the money and ego in Silicon Valley), but it's still an interesting thought exercise, which is why I put the question to various founders and venture capitalists.

Questions that ask about why the candidate wants to pursue a job in a specific field or with your company also fall into this category.

When I answer that why question, the what questions will fall into place.

JPMorgan's relationship with Bitcoin XBT came into question over the weekend when the financial blog Zerohedge asked why the bank was involved with the trading after CEO Jamie Dimon called bitcoin a fraud and said he would fire anyone at the bank who trades it.

That's why the market is so vulnerable to a sell - off when the earnings quality of its largest group is called into question.

May's government also faced questions from the opposition Labour Party about why it awarded the company 1.3 billion pounds of state contracts after Carillion fell into financial difficulty in July last year.

When the taxi industry turns into Uber, when delivery companies turn into GrubHub, when music sharing turns into iTunes, that's when everyone sits back and says, «Thank goodness someone asked the question, «Why?»».

That's why we've asked online marketing expert Jason Falls to join me in a Google Hangout, «Tap Into the Power of Social Media,» to answer all your burning questions.

Perhaps that's why I never questioned my right to take what time I needed, to make my job fit into the space leftover after taking care of my babies, and not the other way around.

Some critics also question why Priceline is moving into the online meta - search market at a time when one of its rivals, Expedia (EXPE), last December exited this niche with the spinoff of its TripAdvisor business.

When a chip card is presented and it is required that you dip that into a terminal, folks are going to start asking questions as to why this is happening.

JPMorgan's relationship with Bitcoin XBT came into question over the weekend when the financial blog Zerohedge asked why the bank was involved with the trading after Chief Executive Jamie Dimon called bitcoin a fraud and said he would fire anyone at the bank who trades it.

The airlines that survived the volatile decade following 9/11 have since consolidated themselves into a lucrative oligopoly, prompting questions about why smaller cities continue to lose service, why seats keep getting smaller, why fares have remained stubbornly high even as fuel prices dropped and profits soared, and why paying passengers are being quasi-defenestrated from overbooked flights.

To be fair — and this gets a bit into question # 2 (why are the models systematically wrong)-- no one really knows the timing of how this kind of dynamic plays out in the macroeconomy.

She literally discussed and answered questions about all of the investing topics I have recently been thinking about — including weighing the pros and cons of placing all of your bond investments into tax - deferred accounts, why Vanguard decided to recently increase their recommended stock allocation to include 40 % international stocks, and how more investors using REITs (real estate investment trust funds) to balanced their portfolios and mitigate risk.

Susan questioned this change, pondering why a long - established business center operator would lean so strongly towards the coworking model: «Is Regus truly shifting and transforming into a coworking space provider or is this simply a marketing strategy?»

According to The Globe & Mail: «The results of this year's Great Place to Work Institute survey answer that question, and offer insight into why some companies» employees are simply happier — and busier.»

Today we're diving into those thoughts and feelings, and — because we got so many questions about it — diving into why we did pay off the mortgage on our house but why we're not paying off the mortgage on our rental anytime soon.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

Why is it that the financial markets are constantly forcing people to call into question their own process and strategy?

The post goes into lots of detail about why it's important to ask each question and how each interviewee's answer should be structured.

But the biggest question - why the Autopilot steered into the barrier in the first place - remains unaddressed.

Why would she give BC's position any credibility by participating in the drafting of the question, furthermore why would Horgan let her get anywhere near the question when she's already made her position crystal clear — any attempt by BC to control what goes into a federally regulated pipeline is unconstitutionWhy would she give BC's position any credibility by participating in the drafting of the question, furthermore why would Horgan let her get anywhere near the question when she's already made her position crystal clear — any attempt by BC to control what goes into a federally regulated pipeline is unconstitutionwhy would Horgan let her get anywhere near the question when she's already made her position crystal clear — any attempt by BC to control what goes into a federally regulated pipeline is unconstitutional.

If you start questioning why stocks should increase in value over time, then you can get into some esoteric arguments.

The real question is why consumers or business buyers will not buy into not only HP's Touchpad but all the other Apple iPad imitators including Blackberry's Playbook and the Android Tablets?

Plus I have to add the question if the Bible is God's inspired inerrant word than why did so many textual errors find their way into the text?

Chad So why do you come on this blog day after day asking the question «What investigation have you done into rejecting the God of Israel?»

I'm not sure what I said to lead you to believe that I am «throwing out the most proven and fundamental laws of science» since I'm pretty sure that none of the laws that you mention describe a need for the past to be gone and the future to not exist yet, and I was only forwarding a theoretical possibility with apparently good evidence as far as I can tell to address the question «Why would matter come into existence all by itself for no good reason?»

The question of why God allows it can easily subvert an author into producing something of little relevance to those at the sharp end of life's experience... More

I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?

And the question still remains: why would he make it «good» and then let it all be torn down and thrown into the chaos we now see?

To stop studying those authors as exemplars and to inquire instead into how they came to be revered and how others came to be reviled or ignored is to find ourselves caught up in the moral and political question of why this should be so.

Rather the question should be: why are so many people still being brainwashed into believing that tithing is important and why do we continue to allow thieves and frauds into the pulpits to teach these things?

So now the question before us is not how we can rearrange the story and cut it up into pieces to make it more «helpful,» but rather to figure out why God chose to give us such a book.

But the question remains: why did an all - powerful God allow us to disrupt his creation and bring so much suffering into it?

Give us some insight into why you so relentlessly pursue publishing your world - view, especially here, in a place of questions, rather than a place of dogmatic anything.

My question was, why is anyone fighting to have a prayer in a meeting if it's really no big deal and is not intended to inject religion into government / public affairs?

Woody Allen, it would seem, also puts into joke form an often unarticulated question: if God really exists, why doesn't he demonstrate his existence?

here is a question for you to ponder; if god is so powerful that he thought the universe into exsistance, why does he need to cause natural events just to deal with a few medelsome humans; why not just blink those he doesn't like out of exsistance?