Not exact matches
Under an agreement with Russia, the United States was to convert 34 metric tons of plutonium
into fuel for civilian
reactors that generate electricity.
TEPCO modeling and analyses suggest that most, if not all, of the
fuel in the Unit 1
reactor melted, burned through the
reactor pressure vessel, dropped to the bottom of the containment vessel, and perhaps ate
into the concrete base.
Fuel units must be stored initially in pools at
reactor sites for about five years, until the decay heat drops enough to permit movement
into dry cask containers.
This is the case because even when fission is stopped by driving neutron - absorbing control rods
into a
reactor core, radioactivity still warms the
fuel rods.
In particular, a relatively new form of nuclear technology could overcome the principal drawbacks of current methods — namely, worries about
reactor accidents, the potential for diversion of nuclear
fuel into highly destructive weapons, the management of dangerous, long - lived radioactive waste, and the depletion of global reserves of economically available uranium.
This nuclear
fuel cycle would combine two innovations: pyrometallurgical processing (a high - temperature method of recycling
reactor waste
into fuel) and advanced fast - neutron
reactors capable of burning that
fuel.
Coupling
Reactor Types If advanced fast
reactors come
into use, they will at first burn spent thermal -
reactor fuel that has been recycled using pyroprocessing.
Next they scrape the accumulated materials off the electrode, melt them down, cast them
into an ingot and pass the ingot to a refabrication line for conversion
into fast -
reactor fuel.
Nuclear Electric expects to finish loading uranium dioxide
fuel into Britain's first commercial pressurised - water
reactor this week.
Two snakelike robots crawled through a pipe leading
into the 48 - meter - tall primary containment vessel in the Unit 1
reactor to ascertain the state of melted
fuel masses.
Water is being deliberately circulated through each
reactor every day to cool the
fuel within — but the plant lies on a slope, and water from precipitation keeps flowing
into the buildings as well.
That is also enough to meet almost half the
fuel needs of the 104 U.S.
reactors, once various plants located throughout the country shape this uranium
into half - inch -(1.27 - centimeter --RRB- diameter black pellets and then form them
into rods by coating the pellets with zirconium cladding.
That hydrogen buildup was the result of hot steam coming
into contact with overheated nuclear
fuel rods covered by a cladding of zirconium alloy, or «zircaloy» — the material used as
fuel - rod cladding in all water - cooled nuclear
reactors, which constitute more than 90 percent of the world's power
reactors.
For the first time in decades a new uranium rod fabrication plant is operating in New Mexico and it may soon be joined by as many as three others in the U.S.. That's because 2013 will see the expiration of an agreement with Russia that allows the U.S. to blend down the highly enriched uranium from decommissioned Russian nuclear warheads
into the lower level enriched
fuel used in U.S. nuclear
reactors — a program known as «Megatons to Megawatts» that currently provides as much as 50 percent of U.S. nuclear
fuel.
Two other companies, Energy Matter Conversion Corp. (EMC2) and Tri Alpha Energy, are developing
reactors that use proton - boron
fuel, which requires even higher temperatures than deuterium does but allows almost direct conversion of fusion
into electricity, without boiling water to drive a generator.
If unchecked, a meltdown can send superheated
fuel through the steel and concrete that surrounds it, damaging or destroying the
reactor and releasing extreme levels of radiation
into the environment.
One of their most significant contributions was the design of a concrete shield to prevent molten
fuel seeping from the
reactor and through the ground
into the water table.
The government has already spent about $ 4 billion on the project, Scott noted, which is supposed to help convert 34 metric tons of weapons - grade plutonium from the former Soviet Union and elsewhere
into fuel pellets for commercial
reactors.
«We're going to take plutonium oxide that's a powder, turn it
into fuel form, put it in the
reactor, make it more radioactive, and then put that
into the ground,» Loewen admits, which would also render it unfit for nuclear weapons.
Hydrogen can also be split from water in high - temperature nuclear
reactors or generated from fossil
fuels such as coal or natural gas, with the resulting carbon dioxide captured and sequestered rather than released
into the atmosphere.
The gate allowed water from the
reactor well to leak
into the spent
fuel pool, partially refilling it.
The most logical solution, experts say, would be to send the 9700 kilograms of LEU to Russia for conversion
into fuel rods for Iran's Russian - built Bushehr nuclear
reactor, in operation since 2011.
«If I was going to try to get rid of 100 tons of plutonium, I'd burn it in a light - water
reactor,» Cochran says, by making it
into the mixed oxide
fuels.
To implement the PMDA, the United States has been building a mixed oxide (MOX)
fuel fabrication facility to convert the plutonium
into nuclear
reactor fuel.
In these countries, used
fuel is recycled to recover uranium and plutonium (produced during irradiation in
reactors) and reprocess it
into new
fuel.
Since he still doesn't know what
fuel would make it run, it's still not very interesting, other than the fact that he's put a lot of evident work
into figuring out some of the basic properties of the
reactor despite not having any clue how its core would actually work.
The product cylinders are then loaded
into sturdy protective containers for shipment to a nuclear
fuel fabricator where the enriched uranium is converted
into fuel assemblies for nuclear power
reactors.
The plant will also host the Encapsulation Repository Facility where spent
reactor fuel will be placed in iron and copper lined canisters that weigh 27 metric tonnes and will be embedded 500 meters
into granite bedrock.
Under a landmark agreement between the United States and Russia, 500 metric tons of former Soviet nuclear weapons material was converted
into fuel for America's civilian power
reactors.
Through a multi-step process in Russia, the bomb - grade uranium material was converted
into a different chemical form and then diluted
into low enriched uranium suitable for use in fabricating commercial nuclear power
reactor fuel.
PRISM puts the used
fuel from the core
into the upper portion of the
reactor vessel.
Fast
reactors on a closed
fuel cycle use nearly all the actinides fed
into them, while low energy
reactors use only around one percent of the
fuel.
Szilard had many ideas about the
reactor design, and it was at this time that he actually thought up a name to the «nuclear breeder
reactor,» which is supposed to make more
fuel than it consumes by bombarding uranium - 238, which does not fission, turning it
into plutonium - 239, which does fission.
«What it does is it takes different sorts of
fuel materials such as plutonium or used nuclear
fuel, it casts that
into a metallic
fuel, it puts it in a
reactor that has liquid sodium as a coolant — and if you have liquid sodium as a coolant then the energies of the neutrons are higher so you can use a different
fuel source.
The removed «spent»
fuel then is placed
into deep pools of water at the
reactor site, where it continues to generate heat and radiation (Figure 1).
This was the
fuel waiting to be placed
into the
reactor core upon its restart.
I was trying to estimate the mining footprints of solar and nuclear, and came up with some very tentative rough estimates that ore input for solar energy might have an energy density (per unit mass) ~ 5 to 80 times coal, while nuclear (convential US
fuel cycle) may be ~ 20 times coal — on the solar side, this doesn't include some balance of system components, and on the nuclear side, it only includes the U, but on the solar side, the actual energy density could get much higher with recycling of the same material
into multiple successive generations of solar energy devices, and on the nuclear side, breeder
reactors.
Since a
reactor full
fuel load is around 11 tons of 2 % U235 and 98 % U238, and one load lasts about 10 years, and what one coal fired power plant puts
into the air and cinders fully
fuels a nuclear power plant.
Energy Probe has also been successful in stopping the export of Canada's Candu nuclear
reactors, most of which have been sought by states with nuclear weapons aspirations — the Candu design lends itself to surreptitious diversion of spent
fuel suitable for reprocessing
into weapons grade material.
Pebble bed
reactors have a high enough temperature that they can combine water and CO2
into liquid
fuels in the future.
Most pressurized water
reactors (PWR, the type I worked on in the U.S. Navy) use water around the
fuel rods to both and transfer heat away fro the
fuel to do work and reflect neutrons back
into the
fuel rods.
Researchers at the Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering at ETH Zurich, Switzerland, have concentrated 3,000 «suns» of solar thermal energy
into a solar
reactor at 1,500 °C for thermochemical splitting of H2O and CO2
into hydrogen and carbon monoxide (syngas), the precursor to kerosene and other liquid
fuels.
I don't think it will take much to convince me, and the general public to move away from fossil
fuels and
into alternatives like Molten Salt
reactors and other alternative energy.
Have you looked
into what is involved in extracting material that is suitable for weapons from light water
reactor used
fuels?
A team from the University of Wisconsin - Madison, University of Massachusetts - Amherst and Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology of South Korea has demonstrated the feasibility of using proton - exchange - membrane (PEM)
reactors electrocatalytically to reduce biomass - derived oxygenates
into renewable
fuels and chemicals.
France and Japan, on the other hand, routinely extract and reprocess plutonium for reuse as
reactor fuel, but the dual - use potential of this process has led Holdren and his coauthors to recommend a «once - through
fuel cycle» in which the spent
fuel is not reprocessed, but instead goes directly
into a storage repository.
After several decades of laboratory testing, these type of
fuels are set to be loaded
into a U.S. civilian nuclear
reactor in 2018, but there is no reason they could not be loaded
into civilian
reactors this fall — something that would require a modest investment by DOE of well - under $ 500 million.
• The restructuring of the former Areva
into Framatome and Orano is complete, with the world's largest nuclear plant operator EDF taking ownership of Framatome, which focuses on
reactors,
fuel fabrication and services.
While the basic technology is Canadian, R&D at Qinshan in China since 2008 has turned a simple concept
into technology which can now be utilised, so that the used
fuel from four conventional
reactors can fully supply one AFCR unit (as well as providing recycled plutonium for MOX).
In its current state, he estimates that an individual would need to shovel the equivalent of a man's weight of sugar
into a 250 - gallon
fuel tank so that the E. coli -
reactor could produce enough hydrogen to power the average home for an entire day.