Many of those ethical values have migrated their way
into religious dogma, however, it is religious dogma that greatly has been shaped by ethical valuations, not vice versa.
again, seems more you are trying to fit modern information
into religious dogma.
you love fitting your world view
into religious dogma.
Not exact matches
However Christians demand that society accept the existence of their god as fact and validate their
religious dogmas by incorporating them
into civil law.
To them, persecution means that someone fails to take
into account
religious dogma when enacting policies, or that they simply have the gal to challenge the basis of your relgious
dogma through intellectual debate.
These comments have mostly degenerated
into people's responses toward
religious dogma.
Even if we chose to interject
religious dogma into the classroom, which religion is appropriate?
When particular elements in the traditional teaching about the nature of things have been challenged by demonstrable scientific findings, the whole structure of
religious dogma has been called
into question.
In other words, the fact that so many people can be swayed by
religious myths and
religious dogma helps us understand why the world is so messed up — people can be talked
into just about anything, including things that are bad for them.
If there IS a war, Rick, it's against YOU and your ilk... those who wish to impose irrelevant and invalid
religious dogma and demagoguery
into politics and government in the 21st Century.
When your outreach includes trying to incorporate your
religious views and
dogma into our laws, expect to be trod upon.
Especially when there are people acting on
religious dogma to withhold medical treatment from their children, kill doctors, sabotage the education system, fill kid's minds with imagery of gratuitous torture, fly planes
into buildings, stone women to death for driving alone... etc...
site the washing of the feet and the drying with the hair... that my friends is a marriage ceremony in Judaic law and custom of that period and yes they did have a daughter named Sarah) but... not it seems to be a shock to many who really did not dig
into their own
religious dogma... blind faith is great if you can achieve it... normally people today need to inspect... inspect and you find the truths... then you will have faith based on the truth, not twists and turns and the human politics of history that changed historical truth.
But I have come to realize that that is simply the
religious dogma of my youth / my parents trying to frighten me back
into line.
But instead of attending more closely to these circumstances in order to think seriously about the changing place and politics of free speech in contemporary India, its proponents have lapsed
into an anachronistic narrative about circumscribing the reach of
religious dogma in social life.
I am not talking here about the limiting beliefs of
religious or political
dogma, which for so long have shackled humanity
into fear, guilt and disempowerment, and could have their own long discussion.
I've been exposed too often to distressing news such as pushing not just
religious dogma, but that of one particular religion
into public school curriculums and textbooks — «reading» would then render one to be a captive of... the Twilight Zone.
That debate is what got the mediaeval Christian world out of its thrall to
religious dogma and
into the enlightenment, with much pain for people brave enough to lead the debate.
In describing the difference between «equilibrium sensitivity» and «transient response» you get
into descriptions which sound very much like
religious belief or
dogma.