Not exact matches
The provisional
school results will include performance
measures such as the percentage of pupils achieving five or more GCSEs or equivalents at A * to C, the percentage of pupils achieving the English Baccalaureate (EBacc), and the Attainment 8 scores, showing average achievement across eight subjects, including English and maths, for those
schools that have opted
into the new
accountability system a year early.
Accountability measures should inquire
into whether
schools are taking the steps that research shows can lead to an appropriate, holistic education, not just an academic outcome.
For example, including a
school safety
measure that looks at the percent of expulsions at a
school might force educators
into creating a dangerous
school environment because expelling or suspending students would affect the
school's
accountability designation.
Too many states try to include too many
measures into their
accountability system, and then none of the individual
measures are really important or really guide
schools on what their learning outcomes need to be.
As a result, trying to assess if a
school is «good» or «bad» relies on a complex web of preferences and objective
measures that, quite frankly, can not be taken
into account in a centralized
accountability system.
From a policy standpoint, the adoption of SEL standards, funding for teacher professional development, and the incorporation of
school climate
into measures of
accountability are all potential levers (among many) to support empowerment efforts.
The reassignment of charter
schools into geographic
school districts means that student counts and other
measures in this data may not match a district's own
accountability data.
My own research has suggested the potential importance of reference bias due to differences in
school climate, leading me to caution in this series against proposals to incorporate survey - based
measures of non-cognitive skills
into high - stakes
accountability systems.
«A «dashboard»
accountability system will include important information about
school and student performance, but it is unclear how it will be
measured and incorporated
into an overall
measure of
school quality.»
Let us all understand this correctly: the new key stage 4
accountability measure will be the lever that gets
schools to enter every pupil
into the now infamous five (effectively seven) Ebacc GCSEs.
«This is a consequence of a continued emphasis on threshold attainment
measures that do not take
into account pupil starting points — it is ironic that this announcement was made on the final day for
schools to opt in early for the new
accountability measure of Progress 8.»
And beyond the
school and district
accountability provisions spawned by No Child Left Behind and its kin, many states have upped the ante to incorporate teachers» contributions to their students» test performance
into teacher evaluation systems, and these value - added
measures require testing large numbers of students.
Further, the standards under Texas» new Performance Framework (an additional system of standards for charter
schools measuring the performance of a charter
school, which are separate and apart from state
accountability standards) must take
into account the uniqueness of charter
schools located within an RTC and truly
measure according to the mission of the
school.
Ladner says that if Arizona instituted strict
accountability measures such as five - year charters and default closures, some charters that blossomed
into top - performing
schools might have been arbitrarily closed.
Alaska is working local interim tests
into its
accountability system as a
measure of
school quality or student success for elementary
schools.
The paper showcases examples of next - generation
accountability work that are already underway, reveals what multimetric
accountability systems can look like and how they work, and shares key takeaways about the common benefits and challenges of incorporating multiple
measures into school accountability systems.
The research presented in this volume seems to support incorporating data around adult collaboration
into accountability measures — data that «reveals more about how
schools actually work — work processes, social interactions, norms and beliefs, and especially how all of this comes together.»
Otherwise, there is very little specifically on the difference between intervention activities in charters versus traditional
schools, and almost no states are incorporating authorizer
accountability measures into their plans.
This new
accountability measure, Attainment 8, will come
into force next academic year for all
schools - but they were given the chance to opt
into it a year early if they wished.
So proponents claiming the mantle of «education reform» have been quick to jump on the one - sided election results as proof - positive of widespread voter support for their ideas, which include competitive charter
schools, vouchers to transfer public education money
into private hands, and harsh
accountability measures to punish
schools and teachers for the circumstances they have very little control over.
Now we know for sure that student grades are being changed by teachers, often under pressure from principals, after CPS turned grades
into high - stakes
measures for selective enrollment high
school applications and for high
school «on - track»
accountability measures.
Even as educators are integrating these more rigorous standards
into their instruction, student and
school performance continue to be judged using No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) outdated testing regimen and
accountability measures.
Incorporate more, and different, kinds of data on student progress and
school performance
into accountability measures.
People already are raising concerns that some state officials are too eager to close low - performing
schools, expand charters, or intrude
into local decision - making — and that
schools serving high - poverty communities undoubtedly will feel
accountability measures target them for scrutiny.
While it could be argued it is based around a curriculum (including its range of «academic» GCSEs) that is not necessarily suited to all students at secondary moderns, the fact it takes
into account the starting point for students in a
school means it marks an extremely welcome step towards a much more meaningful
accountability measure.
Key steps, metrics for establishing benchmarks and outcomes, stakeholder involvement and
accountability measures are agreed upon and written
into a document tailored to the state agency, district or
school.
«Yet when we invite police officers
into the
schools, we don't have any of those
accountability measures to make sure that they are actually making students safer.»
One
measure to which I would give priority is for children throughout Africa, from the first grade of primary
school through the last year of secondary
school, to be taught the values of justice, fairness, and
accountability as part of the normal curriculum, so they might grow
into the leaders and citizens that Africa needs.
Topics covered include: integrating field knowledge of play, development, and theory
into the advanced play therapist's knowledge base; working with difficult situations, such as limit - setting, aggression, and parents; addressing modern work concerns like
measuring progress, data
accountability, and treatment planning; differentiating play therapy practice in
school and community settings; and addressing complicated skills, such as theme work, group play therapy, and supervision.
On June 26, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed
into law a
measure that strengthens the state's home visiting programs and establishes a system of
accountability that will help ensure strong outcomes such as improved health for mothers and infants, and children being better prepared to learn when they start
school.
However, they are coming
into much greater prominence in the national conversation because of ESSA, the new federal law which «requires multiple
measures for
accountability, including at least one nonacademic indicator, generally understood to be an SEL
measure, such as student engagement, educator engagement, and
school climate and safety.»
«While we conclude that
measures of students» social - emotional learning should not be considered as a stand - alone indicator in federal
accountability systems at this time,
measures of
school climate can provide important insights
into how
schools are supporting SEL.»