In the temporal world, «the final «satisfaction» of an actual entity is
intolerant of any addition» (PR 71), because it would alter that occasion's decision.
«The final «satisfaction» of an actual entity is
intolerant of any addition» (PR 71), for any addition would change what it is.
14This is in contrast to what is expressed in the passage:» [The] doctrine, that the final satisfaction» of an actual entity is
intolerant of any addition, expresses the fact that every actual entity — since it is what it is — is finally its own reason for what it omits» (PR 45), which, considering the context, clearly seems to refer to «actual occasions.
He does say, however, God has «objective immortality» (PR 32, quoted below), and that satisfaction «closes up the entity» making it «
intolerant of any addition,» and even if sense could be made of God's «reversed polarity:» I fail to see how it would avoid the problem of a changing whole.
If God is one fact, why isn't God's satisfaction «
intolerant of any addition»?
Not exact matches
In
addition, we know that proteins from mom's diet can pass into breast milk, and some babies seem to be allergic or
intolerant of these proteins.
Milk alternatives aren't just for the lactose
intolerant: They can be great
additions to any diet; just watch out for lots
of added sugar and flavors, says Penner.
In
addition, a lot
of other people I know who are
intolerant can prevent most symptoms by taking Lactaid, but it doesn't work with me at all.